Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:58:31.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity in representations; uniformity in learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

David Danks  and
David Rose
David Danks
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University and Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. ddanks@cmu.edudavidros@andrew.cmu.eduhttp://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/faculty-danks.php
David Rose
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University and Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. ddanks@cmu.edudavidros@andrew.cmu.eduhttp://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/faculty-danks.php
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Henrich et al.'s conclusion that psychologists ought not assume uniformity of psychological phenomena depends on their descriptive claim that there is no pattern to the great diversity in psychological phenomena. We argue that there is a pattern: uniformity of learning processes (broadly construed), and diversity of (some) mental contents (broadly construed).

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 90 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)