Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T21:58:13.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of ignition times: Topographies of cell assemblies and the activation delays they imply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2004

Friedemann Pulvermüller  and
Bettina Mohr
Friedemann Pulvermüller*
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, CambridgeCB2 2EF, United Kingdomhttp://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/Common/People/people-pages/Friedemann.Pulvermuller.html
Bettina Mohr*
Affiliation:
APU, School of Applied Sciences, Department of Psychology, CambridgeCB1 1PT, United Kingdomhttp://www.apu.ac.uk/appsci/psychol/staff/bmohr.htm
*
friedemann.pulvermuller@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk
b.mohr@apu.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cell assembly model of language posits that words are laid down in the cortex by discrete sets of neurons distributed over specific parts of the brain. The strong internal links of these “word webs” may not only bind articulatory and acoustic knowledge of a lexical item, they may also link word and meaning; for example, by connecting neuron populations related to word forms to those of actions and perceptions to which the words refer. Therefore, the cortical activation elicited by words should reflect aspects of word meaning, a postulate that has received strong support from recent work using neurophysiological and metabolic imaging. Segalowitz & Lane make the point that this neurobiological model can also be used to predict reaction times in behavioral experiments, using the behavioral distinction between content and function words as an example. We acclaim their view, but warn that response times might be related to different mechanisms at the neuronal level, including the cortical distribution and internal connectivity of cell assemblies along with their mutual connections in the grammatical (syntactic and semantic) network.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 308 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, D. C., Garrett, M. F. & Zurif, E. B. (1985) Syntactic deficits in Broca’s aphasia. In: Biological studies of mental processes, ed. Caplan, D., pp. 269-86. MIT Press. [SJS]Google Scholar
Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V. & Martin, A. (1999) Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience 2(10):913-19. [rFP]Google Scholar
Gordon, B. & Carmazza, A. (1982) Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity. Brain and Language 15:143-60. [SJS]Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermüller, F. (2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in the motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41:301-307. [rFP]Google Scholar
Humphreys, G. W. & Forde, E. M. (2001) Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(3):453-509. [rFP]Google Scholar
Kucera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press. [SJS]Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. (1990) Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives, ed. Altmann, G.. MIT Press. [rFP]Google Scholar
Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F. & Zaidel, E. (1994) Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of content words, function words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia 32:105-24. [rFP]Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. & McDonald, S. (2004) Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing. Brain and Language 88(3):339-54. [rFP]Google Scholar
Neville, H. J., Mills, D. L. & Lawson, D. S. (1992) Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex 2:244-58. [rFP, SJS]Google Scholar
Oliveri, M., Finocchiaro, C., Shapiro, K., Gangitano, M., Caramazza, A. & Pascual- Leone, A. (2004) All talk and no action: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of motor cortex activation during action word production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(3):374-81. [rFP]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (1999) Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(2): 253-336. [rFP, SJS]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2002) A brain perspective on language mechanisms: From discrete neuronal ensembles to serial order. Progress in Neurobiology 67:85-111. [rFP]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2003) The neuroscience of language. Cambridge University Press. [rFP]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Hummel, F. & Härle, M. (2001) Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language 78(2):143-68. [rFP]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W. & Birbaumer, N. (1995) Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 94:357-70. [rFP, SJS]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Preissl, H., Lutzenberger, W. & Birbaumer, N. (1996) Brain rhythms of language: Nouns versus verbs. European Journal of Neuroscience 8:937-41. [rFP]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y. & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2003) Spatio-temporal patterns of neural language processing: An MEG study using Minimum-Norm Current Estimates. Neuroimage 20:1020-25. [rFP]Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., Kujala, T. & Naatanen, R. (2004) Word-specific cortical activity as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 41(1):106-12. [rFP]Google Scholar
Schmauder, A. R. (1996) Ability to stand alone and processing of open-class and closed-class words: Isolation versus context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25:443-81. [SJS]Google Scholar
Segalowitz, S. J. & Lane, K. C. (2000) Lexical access of function versus content words. Brain and Language 75(3):376-89. [rFP, SJS]Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1988) From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press. [rFP]Google Scholar
Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O. & Pulvermüller, F. (2004) Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience 19(4):1083-92. [rFP]Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1990) Lexical processing of functionally constrained words. Journal of Memory and Language 29:245-57. [SJS]Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, T. (1984) Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107:829-54. [rFP]Google Scholar
Whitaker, H. A. (1983) Towards a brain model of automization: A short essay. In: Memory and control of action, ed. Magill, R. A., pp. 199-214. North-Holland. [SJS]Google Scholar