Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:29:14.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The centrality of practice in ideographic communication, and the perennial puzzle of positivistic thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Lucas B. Mazur Open the ORCID record for Lucas B. Mazur [Opens in a new window]  and
Sandra Plontke
Lucas B. Mazur
Affiliation:
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland lucas.mazur@uj.edu.pl Sigmund Freud University, Berlin, Germany
Sandra Plontke
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany sandra.plontke@rub.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To the extent that we expect ideographs to be closer to the reality they depict than spoken or written words we are succumbing to the perennial allure of positivistic thinking. Morin powerfully argues that human communication, including ideography, cannot be understood apart from practice, thus removing the positivistic assumption that made the “puzzle of ideography” puzzling in the first place.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e247
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bredekamp, H. (2011). In der Tiefe die Künstlichkeit: Das Prinzip der bildaktiven Disjunktion. In Bredekamp, H. & Krois, J. M. (Eds.), Sehen und Handeln (pp. 206–224). Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050062389.206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredekamp, H., Schneider, B., & Dünkel, V. (2008). Das Technische Bild. Kompendium zu einer Stilgeschichte wissenschaftlicher Bilder. Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050062198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, L. J., & Galison, P. (2010). Objectivity. Zone Books.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1935). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Benno Schwabe.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985). Peaceful coexistence in psychology. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Human agency and language (pp. 117–138). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar