Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T06:23:59.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broadening the role of “self-interest” in folk-economic beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Mia Karabegović ,
Amanda Rotella  and
Pat Barclay
Mia Karabegović
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest 1051, Hungary. karabegovic_mia@phd.ceu.eduhttps://cognitivescience.ceu.edu/people/mia-karabegovic-0
Amanda Rotella
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. arotella@uoguelph.cabarclayp@uoguelph.cahttp://amandarotella.ca/research/http://www.patbarclay.com/
Pat Barclay
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. arotella@uoguelph.cabarclayp@uoguelph.cahttp://amandarotella.ca/research/http://www.patbarclay.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We extend Boyer & Petersen's (B&P's) model of folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) by suggesting FEBs serve self-interest (broadly defined), which includes indirect benefits such as creating alliances, advancing self-beneficial ideologies, and signaling one's traits. By expanding the definition of self-interest, the model can predict who will hold what FEBs, which FEBs will propagate, when they will change, why, and in which direction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mia Karabegović and Amanda Rotella contributed equally to the preparation of this commentary.

References

Barclay, P. (2013) Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 34(3):164–75.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2016) Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology 7:33–38. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.012.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. & Willer, R. (2007) Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274(1610):749–53.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55:591–621.Google Scholar
DeScioli, P. & Kurzban, R. (2013) A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin 139(2):477–96. doi: 10.1037/a0029065.Google Scholar
DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B. & Kurzban, R. (2014) Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 281(1797):e20142112.Google Scholar
Galperin, A. & Haselton, M. G. (2013) Error management and the evolution of cognitive bias. In: Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology: Social thinking and interpersonal behavior, ed. Forgas, J. P., Fiedler, K. & Sedikides, C., pp. 45–64. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Higham, J. P. (2014) How does honest costly signaling work? Behavioral Ecology 25(1):8–11.Google Scholar
Naumann, E., Buss, C. & Bähr, J. (2015) How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state: A real panel approach. European Sociological Review 32(1):81–92.Google Scholar
Owens, L. A. & Pedulla, D. S. (2014) Material welfare and changing political preferences: The case of support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces 92(3):1087–113.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Aarøe, L., Jensen, N. H. & Curry, O. (2014) Social welfare and the psychology of food sharing: Short-term hunger increases support for social welfare. Political Psychology 35(6):757–73. doi: 10.1111/pops.12062.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Sell, A., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2013) The ancestral logic of politics: Upper-body strength regulates men's assertion of self-interest over economic redistribution. Psychological Science 24(7):1098–103.Google Scholar
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H. & Knafo, A. (2002) The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(6):789–801.Google Scholar
Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R. & Ayal, S. (2015) Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(2):125–30.Google Scholar
Weeden, J. & Kurzban, R. (2014) The hidden agenda of the political mind: How self-interest shapes our opinions and why we won't admit it. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar