Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-jtg5s Total loading time: 0.219 Render date: 2021-09-21T21:41:53.046Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Psychophysical measures of objects and their features: It is time for a change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Gregory R. Lockhead*
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. greg@psych.duke.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algom, D. (1992) Perception, apperception and psychophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:558–59. [CP]Google Scholar
Allik, J. (1989) Is n unified psychophysical law realistic? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:267–68. [JA]Google Scholar
Allik, J. & Tuulmets, T. (1991) Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Perception and Psychophysics 49:303–14. [JA]Google Scholar
Arcnd, L. E., Buehler, N. & Lockhead, G. R. (1971) Difference information in brightness perception. Perception and Psychophysics 9:367–70. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Bingham, G. P. (1991) The identification problem in visual event perception. Part I: Rate structures in optic flow and the degrees of freedom problem. Indiana University Cognitive Science Research Report No. 52. [SR]Google Scholar
Bingham, G. P. & Runeson, S. (1983) On describing what is perceived: Seeing “velocity” versus seeing “push” in moving objects. Paper presented at the Autumn Meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford, CT. 10 1983. [SR]Google Scholar
Binghnm, G. P., Schmidt, R. C. & Rosenblum, D. (1989) Hefting for a maximum distance throw: A smart perceptual mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15:507–28. [SR]Google Scholar
Booth, D. A. (1988) Estimating JNDs from ratings. Chemical Senses 13:671. [DAB]Google Scholar
Booth, D. A. & Conner, M. T. (1991) Characterisation and measurement of influences on food acceptability by analysis of choice differences: Theory and practice. Food Quality and Preference 2:7585. [DAB]Google Scholar
Booth, D. A. & Freeman, R. P. J. (1993) Discriminative measurementof feature integration in object recognition. Ada Psychologica 84:116. [DAB]Google Scholar
Booth, D. A., Freeman, R. P. J. & Lähteenmäki, L. (1991) Likings for complex foods and meals. Appetite 17:156. [DAB]Google Scholar
Booth, D. A. & Shepherd, R. (1988) Sensory influences on food acceptance the neglected approach to nutrition promotion. BNF Nutrition Bulletin 13 (1): 3954. [DAB]Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1950) A history of experimental psychology. Appleton-Century Crofts. [rGRL, CP]Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. (1956) Perception and representative design of psychological experiments. University of California Press. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (1992) Accounting for an old inconsistency in the psychophysics of Plateau and Delboeuf. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:562–63. [CP]Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1977) Treatise on basic philosophy. Ontology I: the furniture of the toorld. Reidel. [SR]Google Scholar
Burton, G. & Turvey, M. T. (1990) Perceiving thelengths of rods that are held but not wielded. Ecological Psychology 2:295324. [SR]Google Scholar
Chase, S. & Heinemann, E. G. (1972) Choices based on redundant information: An analysis of two-dimensional stimulus control. journal of Experimental Psychology 92:161–75. [VS[Google Scholar
Conner, M. T., Haddon, A. V., Pickering, E. S. & Booth, D. A. (1988) Sweet tooth demonstrated: Individual differences in preference for both sweet foods and foods highly sweetened. Journal of Applied Psychology 73:275–80. [DAB]Google Scholar
Coren, S. (1992) Psychophysical scaling: Context and illusion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:563–64. [CP]Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1990) What mad pursuit. A personal view of a scientific discovery. Penguin. [JA]Google Scholar
Dzhafarov, E. N. (1992) Can brightness be related to luminance by a meaningful function? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:565–66. [JA]Google Scholar
Ennis, D. M., Palen, J. J. & Mullen, K. (1988) A multidimensional stochastic theory of similarity. Journal of Mathmatical Psychology 32:449– 65. [DAB]Google Scholar
Falmagne, F.-C. (1985) Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford University Press. [DAB]Google Scholar
Garner, W. R. (1974) The processing of information and structure. Erlbaum. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Geschcider, C. A. (1988) Psychophysical scaling. Annual Review of Psychology 39:169200. [VS]Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin. [SR]Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin. [rGRL, SR]Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception Houghton Mifflin. [rGRL, SR]Google Scholar
Gravetter, F. & Lockhead, C. (1973) Critical range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment. Psychological Review 80:203–16. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Heinemann, E. G. & Chase, S. (1970) Conditional stimulus control. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84:187–97. [VS]Google Scholar
Helson, H. (1964) Adaption-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. Harper & Row. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. & Boring, E. G., eds. (1966) A source book in thehistory of psychology. Harvard University Press. [CP]Google Scholar
Hinson, J. & Lockhead, G. R. (1986) Range effects in successive discrimination procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 12:270–76. [rGRL, VS]Google Scholar
Hofer, G. & Sarris, V. (1992) Test–series effects in psychophysical responses by chickens and humans. Paper presented to the 25th International Congress of Psychology, Brussels, Belgium, 07 [VS]Google Scholar
Holland, M. & Lockhead, G. (1968) Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception and Psychophysics. 3:409–14. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. W. & Lockhead, G. R. (1977) Similarity as distance: A structural principle for semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3:660–78. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Indow, T. & Ida, M. (1977) Scaling of dot numerosity. Perception and Psychophysics 22:265–76. [JA]Google Scholar
Kanisza, G. (1974) Contours without gradients or cognitive contours? Italian Journal of Psychology 1(1) 92112. [rGRL]Google Scholar
King, M. C. & Lockhead, G. (1981) Response scales and sequential effects in judgment. Perception and Psychophysics 30:599603. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Knibestöl, M. & Vallbo, Å. B. (1980) Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. Journal of Physiology 300:251–67. [rGRL, GSW]Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1929) Gestalt psychology. Macmillan. [CP]Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1972) Perceived numerosity. Perception and Psychophysics 11:59. [JA]Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1984) Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments. Perception and Psychophysics 35:536–42. [JA]Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1989) Reconciling Fechncr and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:251–66. [DAB, GSW]Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1992) Will the real stimulus please step forward? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:570–72. [SR]Google Scholar
Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S. & Turvey, M. T. (1982) On the control and coordination of naturally developing systems. The development of movement control and co–ordination, ed. Kelso, J. A. S. & Clark, J. E.. Wiley. [SR]Google Scholar
Külpe, O. (1901) Outlines of psychology. Macmillan. [CP]Google Scholar
Laming, D. (1986) Sensory analysis. Academic Press. [DAB]Google Scholar
Laming, D.(1989) Experimental evidence for Fechner's and Stevens's laws. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:277–81. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Land, E. H. (1959) Color vision and the natural image. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 45:115–29, 536–644. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Land, E. H. (1977) The retinex theory of color vision. Scientific American, 1977; reprinted in: The Perceptual World, ed. I. Rock. Freeman, 1990. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Lawless, H. T. (1991) Bridging the gap between sensory science and product evaluation. In: Sensory science theory and application in foods, ed. Lawless, H. T. and Klein, B. P.. Marcel Dekker. [DAB]Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. R. (1966) Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:95104.Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. R. (1972) Processing dimensional stimuli: A note. Psychological Review 79:410–19. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. R. (1992a) Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:543601. [rGRL, JA, DAB, CP, SR, VS, GSW]Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. R. (1992b) On identifying things: A case for context. In: Percepts, concepts, and categories: The representation and processing of information, ed. Burns, B., Advances in Psychology. North Holland. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. R. (1993) A parallel view of the history of psychophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:154–55. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. R. & King, M. C. (1977) Classifying integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3:436–43. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Monahan, J. S. (1992) Attributes or objects: A paradigm shift in psychophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:577. [CP]Google Scholar
Monahan, J. S. & Lockhead, G. R. (1977) Identification of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106:94110. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Morgan, M. J., Hole, G. J. & Glennerster, A. (1990) Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusion. Vision Research 30:17931810. [JA]Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1896): Zur Psychophysik der Gesichtesempfindungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologic und Physiologic der Sinnesorgane 10:182. [CP]Google Scholar
Murray, D. J. (1993) A perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:115–37. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Niall, K. K. (1992) The evident object of inquiry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:578. [CP]Google Scholar
Nosofsky, R. M. (1988) On exemplar–based exemplar representations: Reply to Ennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117:412–14. [DAB]Google Scholar
Parducci, A. (1983) Category ratings and the relational character of judgment. In: Modern issues in perception, ed. Geissler, H.-G., Buffart, H. F. J. M., Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. & Sarris, V.. North-Holland. [VS]Google Scholar
Poulton, E. C. (1989) Uncertain size of exponent when judging without familiar units. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:286–88. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. (1990) Visual perception in people and machines. In: Al and the eye, ed. Blake, A. & Troscianko, T.. Wiley. [rGRL, JA]Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. & Booth, D. A. (1993) Multiple physical patterns in judgments of the creamy texture of milks and creams. Ada Psychologica 84:93101. [DAB]Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104:192233. [VS]Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (1978) fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems. North–Holland. [SR]Google Scholar
Runeson, S. (1974) Constant velocity – not perceived as such. Psychological Research 37:323. [SR]Google Scholar
Runeson, S. (1975) Visual prediction of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions. Perception and Psychophysics 18:261–66. [SR]Google Scholar
Runeson, S. (1977) On the possibility of “smart” perceptual mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18:172–79. [JA, SR]Google Scholar
Runeson, S. & Vedeler, D. (1993) The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass. Perception and Psychophysics 53:617–32. [rGRL, SR]Google Scholar
Sarris, V. (1975) Wahrnehmung und Urteil: Bezugssystemeffekte in der Psychophysik [Perception and judgment: Frame–of–reference effects in psychophysics]. 2d ed. Hogrefe. [VS]Google Scholar
Sarris, V. (1990) Contextual effects in animal psychophysics: A comparative analysis of the chicken's perceptual relativity. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology 10:475–89. [VS]Google Scholar
Sarris, V., Hofer, G. & Zoeke, B. (1990) The chicken's visual psychophysics: Two-dimensional effects. In: Proceedings of the sixth annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, ed. Müller, F.. Würzburg, Germany. [VS]Google Scholar
Sarris, V. & Parducci, A. (1978) Multiple anchoring of category rating scales. Perception & Psychophysics 24:3539. [VS]Google Scholar
Sarris, V. & Zoeke, B. (1985) Tests of a quantitative frame-of-referencc model: Practice effects in psychophysical judgments with different age groups. In: Cognition, information processing, and motivation, ed. d'Ydewalle, G.. North-Holland. [VS]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1991) Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: Evolution of the distinction and a proposed theoretical basis. In: The perception of structure, ed. Lockhead, G. R. & Pomerantz., J. American Psychological Association. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Solomon, H. Y. & Turvey, M. T. (1988) Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand–held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14:404–27. [SR]Google Scholar
Stebbins, W. C. (1990) Perception in animal behavior. In: Comparative perception, vol. I, ed. Berkeley, M. A. & Stebbins, W. C.. Wiley. [VS]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review 64:153–81. [CP]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1975) Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. Wiley. [JA]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. & Davis, H. (1938) Hearing. Wiley. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Teghtsoonian, R. (1971) On the exponents in Stevens's law and the constants in Ekman's law. Psychological Review 78:7180. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R. (1974) The role of adaptation-level in stimulus generalization. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 8, ed. Bower, G. H.. Academic Press. [VS]Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R., Lusky, M. & Morrison, S. (1992) Go/no–go choice: A comparison of generalization functions and franje of reference effects in two training paradigms. Perception and Psychophysics 51:529–40. [VS]Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R., Mood, K., Morrison, S. & Wiertelak, E. (1991) Peak shift revisited: A test of alternative interpretations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 17:130–40. [VS]Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1896) An outline of psychology. Macmillan.[CP]Google Scholar
Turvey, M. T. (1986) Intentionality: A problem of multiple reference frames, specificational information, and extraordinary boundary conditions on natural law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:153–55. [SR]Google Scholar
Turvey, M. T. (1992) Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology 4:173–87. [SR]Google Scholar
Turvey, M. T. & Carello, C. (1986) The ecological approach to perceivingacting: A pictorial essay. Ada Psychologica 63:133–55. [SR]Google Scholar
van Brakel, J. (1992) Ceteris paribus laws. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:584–85. [GSW]Google Scholar
Ward, L. M. & Lockhead, G. R. (1971) Response system processes in absolute judgment. Perception and Psychophysics 9:7378. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Wasserman, G. S. (1991) Neural and behavioral assessments of sensory quantity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:192–93. [rGRL, GSW]Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1885) Über des Weber'sche Gesetz. Philosophischc Studicn 2:136. [CP]Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1902) Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologic, vol. I, 5th edition. Engelmann. [CP]Google Scholar
Zeki, S. (1993) A vision of the brain. Blackwell Scientific Publications. [rGRL]Google Scholar
Zoeke, B., Sarris, V. & Hofer, G. (1988) Psychophysical context effects in chickens (hubbards). International Journal of Comparative Psychology 1:167–78. [VS]Google Scholar
Zoeke, B. Sarris, V. (1989) Comparative psychophysics: Some contextual effects in birds and humans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 2:151–63. [VS]Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Psychophysical measures of objects and their features: It is time for a change
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Psychophysical measures of objects and their features: It is time for a change
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Psychophysical measures of objects and their features: It is time for a change
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *