Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T19:04:04.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The perils of a science of intentional change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Muhammad Ali Khalidi*
Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Program, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. khalidi@yorku.ca


The attempt to construct an applied science of social change raises certain concerns, both theoretical and ethical. The theoretical concerns relate to the feasibility of predicting human behavior with sufficient reliability to ground a science that aspires to the management of social processes. The ethical concerns relate to the moral hazards involved in the modification of human social arrangements, given the unreliability of predicting human action.

Open Peer Commentary
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Andrews, K. (2012) Do apes read minds?: Toward a new folk psychology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005) Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carey, S. & Spelke, E. (1994) Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In: Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, ed. Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A., pp. 169200. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, D. D. & Cummins, R. (1999) Biological preparedness and evolutionary explanation. Cognition 73:B3753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, R. & Stich, S. P. (2000) The odd couple: The compatibility of social construction and evolutionary psychology. Philosophy of Science 67:133–54.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1995) Mapping the evolved functional organization of the mind and brain. In: The cognitive neurosciences, ed. Gazzaniga, M. S., pp. 1185–97. MIT Press.Google Scholar