Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T09:33:13.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expectations and morality: A dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Eric Mandelbaum
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, The Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 1PT, United KingdomEric.Mandelbaum@philosophy.ox.ac.ukhttp://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/our_staff/research/eric_mandelbaum
David Ripley
Affiliation:
Institut Jean Nicod, DEC-ENS, 75005 Paris, France. davewripley@gmail.comhttp://sites.google.com/site/davewripley

Abstract

We propose Knobe's explanation of his cases encounters a dilemma: Either his explanation works and, counterintuitively, morality is not at the heart of these effects; or morality is at the heart of the effects and Knobe's explanation does not succeed. This dilemma is then used to temper the use of the Knobe paradigm for discovering moral norms.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J. & Bloom, P. (2009) Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion 9(3):435–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knobe, J. & Mendlow, G. (2004) The good, the bad, and the blameworthy: Understanding the role of evaluative considerations in folk psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24:252–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (2008) The folk concept of intentional action: Philosophical and experimental issues. Mind and Language 23(2):165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, M. & Sarkissian, H. (2008) The folk strike back; or, why you didn't do it intentionally, though it was bad and you knew it. Philosophical Studies 138(2):291–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar