Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:40:59.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Come and Go’ Syndrome of Teachers in Remote Indigenous Schools: Listening to the Perspective of Indigenous Teachers about What Helps Teachers to Stay and What Makes Them Go

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2013

Lisa Hall
Lisa Hall*
Affiliation:
Educational Consultant and Researcher, Alice Springs, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Lisa Hall, Education Consultant and Researcher, PO Box 3677, Alice Springs 0871 NT, Australia. Email: Lisahall74@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

High turnover of teachers in remote Indigenous community schools in the Northern Territory has long been considered a significant contributing factor to low academic outcomes for students in those communities. The average length of stay for a non-Indigenous teacher in a remote school can more easily be measured in months than years. This instability in staffing is largely responsible for the instability experienced by many students in these schools. This ‘Come and Go’ syndrome holds true for non-Indigenous staff; however, the opposite can often be said of Indigenous staff. Indigenous staff in these schools tend to be the ‘Stay and Stay and Stay’ teachers. They have often worked in their local community school for decades and have seen literally hundreds of non-Indigenous teachers ‘Come and Go’. They have been the ones to provide a semblance of stability and some level of program sustainability in education for the children of their own communities. While there is some qualitative data on the things that improve retention of non-Indigenous teachers in rural and remote schools, it mostly looks at the training and skills development that can be applied to the situation. No one has really ever asked Indigenous teachers for their observations or opinions about what makes teachers stay and what makes them go. This article will draw on conversations from two focus groups of Indigenous teachers from remote schools in Central Australia who were invited to discuss just this question.

Keywords

Indigenousteacherremoteturnover
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , December 2012 , pp. 187 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Duhou, I., McKenna, R., & Howley, T. (2006). Evaluating literacy approaches for ESL Indigenous students (Paper 2). Darwin, Australia: Department of Employment, Education and Training, Northern Territory.Google Scholar
Amosa, W., Ladwig, J., Griffiths, T., & Gore, J. (2007, November). Equity effects of quality teaching: Closing the gap. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, Australia.Google Scholar
Barker, B.O., & Beckner, W.E. (1987). Pre-service training for rural teachers: A Survey. The Rural Educator, 8 (3), 1–4.Google Scholar
Bush Tracks Research Collective. (2005, November). Bush tracks: Exploring rural teaching transitions. Paper presented at the Bush Tracks Symposium, Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Parramatta, Australia.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., & Schon, E. (1996). Who teaches and why? Dilemmas for building a profession for twenty-first century schools. In Sikula, J., Buttery, T., & Guyton, E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 67–101). New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Edward-Groves, C., & Murray, C. (2008). Enabling voice: Perceptions of schooling from rural Aboriginal youth at risk of entering the juvenile justice system. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fovet, F., & Hall, L. (2012). The lonesome road: A comparative study of low retention of teachers working in Aboriginal and SEBD contexts. Global Education Review, 1 (1), 9–2.Google Scholar
Fredericks, B. (2007). Utilising the concept of pathway as a framework for Indigenous research. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36 (S), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopinathan, S. (2006). Challenging the paradigm: Notes on developing an indigenized teacher education curriculum, Improving Schools, 9 (3), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L., Anderson, L., Gibson, F., Roennfedt, L., Whitehead, B., & Marika, R. (2009, November). What makes education work for Indigenous learners? Paper presented at the National Indigenous Education Conference, Hobart, Australia.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (2008). Challenging pedagogies: Engaging ESL students in intellectual quality. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31 (2), 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpaz, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2000). Communities of thinking. Educational Leadership, 58 (3), 54–57.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented to the Australian Council for Educational Research, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Hickling-Hudson, A., & Ahlquist, R. (2003). Contesting the curriculum in the schooling of Indigenous children in Australia and the United States: From Eurocentrism to culturally powerful pedagogies. Comparative Education Review, 47 (S), 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, L. (2003). Teacher collegiality in a remote Australian school. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18 (3), 139–144.Google Scholar
Johnston, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). ‘This is as good as it gets’: Classroom lessons and learning in challenging circumstances. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31 (2), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, S., Stocek, C., Mark, R., & Matches, S. (2009). Doing participatory evaluation: from ‘jagged world views’ to Indigenous methodology. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38 (S), 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenberg Ball, D., & Forzani, F.M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (5), 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, V.D. (1992). Teacher recruitment and retention practices in rural school districts. The Rural Educator, 14 (2), 20–24.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in school: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonozing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (1990). Recruiting and retaining teachers in rural schools. Knowledge Brief, 4, 1–5.Google Scholar
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis interaction. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Turpin, M. (2005). Aboriginal languages. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from http://www.clc.org.au/articles/cat/aboriginal-languages-of-central-australia/Google Scholar
Wilson, C. (2001). Review of ‘Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples’. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 17, 214–217.Google Scholar
Yarrow, A., Ballantyne, R., Hansford, B., Herschell, P., & Millwater, J. (1999). Teaching in rural and remote schools: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar