Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T08:45:28.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bringing Knowledge to Truth: The Joke and Australian (In)Humanities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Cathryn McConaghy*
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia
Get access

Abstract

In the formulation of new humanities – knowledge, truth and social action brought together in the defence of what makes us human in this place and time – there is also the need to identify the obstacles to honouring our humanity. This paper continues the task of critically examining contemporary forms of inhumanity, in this instance as perpetuated by a liberal Australian government against its citizens and others. Liberalism, by nature, enables the co-existence of contradictory practices that both protect and deny human rights and dignities. In psychoanalytic terms, the defence of liberties and its repressed other, the denial of them, are both present in such states. Because of their links with both the conscious and the unconscious, an analysis of jokes provides insights into these contradictory processes. The paper explores how both the humanities and the inhumanities are manifest variously in the joking behaviours of social groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International. (1998). Jailed for being hungry (AI Index ACT 76/04/98, 1 November). Retrieved 25 Feburary, 2006, from http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGACT76004l998?open&of=ENG-MWI.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2000a). Australia: UN Human Rights Committee findings (AI Index ASA 12/007/2000,28 July).Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGASA120072000.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2000b). Australia: Prime Minister’s disregard of human rights obligations shocks Amnesty International (AI Index ASA 12/02/00, 18 February). Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://web.amnesty.org/aidoc/ai.nsf/517bdedf83fa5eef80256cbf004dcabf/f5f89433b3fc9f468025688d003c7490/$FILE/ASA1200200.pdf.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2000c). Australia shies away from UN scrutiny (AI Index ASA 12/05/00,30 March). Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://web.amnestyorg/library/Index/ENGASA120052000?open&of=ENG-AUS.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2001). Australia: Picking and choosing human rights standards (AI Index ASA 12/001/2001,27 March). Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGASA120012001.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2002). Australia-Pacific: Offending human dignity — The “Pacific solution” (AI Index ASA 12/009/2002,25 August). Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA120092002?open&of=ENG-398.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J.M. (2000). Disgrace. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. (1998). Fifty-third session, 3-21 August 1998: Decision 1 (53) on Australia: Australia. 11/08/98,A/53/18,para.IIBl Retrieved 4 November, 2005, from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/A.53.18,para.IIBl.En?OpenDocument.Google Scholar
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. (2000). Fifty-sixth session, 6-24 March 2000: Concluding observations by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: Australia. 19/04/2000, CERD/C/304/Add.101. Retrieved 4 November, 2005, from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/CERD.C.304.Add.l01.En?Opendocument.Google Scholar
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. (2005). Sixty-sixth session, 21 February — 11 March 2005: Consideration of reports submitted by States Parties under Article 9 of the Convention: Concluding observations of the Committee on Australia, CERD/C/AUS/Co/14 , March 2005 Retrieved 5 September, 2005, from http://wwwHumanrights.Gov.Au/Cerd/Report.html.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1994). Spectres of’Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foundation for Aboriginal and Islander Research Action (FAIRA). (2005). Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Commission. Unpublished document.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1976 [1905]). The joke and its relation to the unconscious: The Penguin Freud library. (Vol. 6). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
High Court of Australia. (2000). Cubillo and Gunner v the Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 4 November, 2005, from http://judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/2000/J001084.doc.htmGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. (1996, 30 October). Weekly House Hansard. (p. 4). Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/hansreps.htm#1996.Google Scholar
Howard, J. (2005). Forward. In Attorney-General’s Department (Ed.), Australia’s national framework for human rights. (p. 4). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Howard, J. (n. d.). ABC 7.30 Report transcript. (Retrieved 4 November, 2005, from Canberra: http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/sl15691.htm.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. (1997). Bringing them home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families. Retrieved 4 November, 2005, from Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. (2000). Australia’s human rights record reviewed by the UN Human Rights Committee. Retrieved 5 September, 2005, from http://www.hreoc.gov.au/human_rights/un_committee/.Google Scholar
Levi, P. (1999). If this is a man. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Marr, D. (2005, 28 March). Geneva v Canberra. Sydney Morning Herald News Review. pp. 13&14.Google Scholar
McConaghy, C. (1998). Colonial desires and the contradictions of Australian liberalism. In Soliman, I. (Ed.), Does the body count?. (pp. 58&68. Annidale, NSW: Department of Women’s and Gender Studies, University of New England.Google Scholar
Metherell, M. (2005, 1 April). PM’s vision: Australia as honest broker. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 1.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. 1993. An Islander’s story of a struggle for “better” education. Ngoonjook, 9, 5367.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (2002). Equals. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Rose, D.B. (2005). Pattern, connection, desire: In honour of Gregory Bateson (Australian Humanities Review, 35). Retrieved 25 Feburary, 2006, from http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/AHR/archive/Issue-June-2005/rose.html.Google Scholar
Rowse, T. (2000). White flour, white power. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1993). Cultural and imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Schaffer, K. (2001). Manne’s generation: White nation responses to the Stolen Generation Report (Australian Humanities Review). Retrieved 4 November, 2005, from http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/AHR/archive/Issue-June-2001/schaffer.html.Google Scholar
Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Human Rights of Migrants. (2005). Report to the UNHRC. Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/FramePage/migrants%20En?OpenDocument&Start=l&Count=15&Expand=2.Google Scholar
Wright, E. (2000). The joke, the “as if”, and the statement. In Levine, M.P. (Ed.), The analytic Freud (pp. 294311). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (1999a). The ticklish subject. Verso, London.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (1999b). The undergrowth of enjoyment. In Wright, E. & Wright, E. (Eds.), The Žižek reader (pp. 1136). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2004). Iraq: The borrowed kettle. London: Verso.Google Scholar