Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:19:00.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Green Fridge Quest - Tertiary Environmental Education for ESD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Carrie Sonneborn
Carrie Sonneborn*
Affiliation:
Australian Conservation Foundation, A.C.T.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Historically the values of schools and colleges have mirrored those of the larger society. Not only has education uncritically accepted the association of progress and the unfettered growth economy, it has trained engineers and managers, performed the research and developed the technologies which in aggregate have had such a devastating impact on the environment. A fundamental reorientation now needs to occur with the development of new assumptions undergirding education which treat the interaction of ecological processes, market forces, cultural values, equitable decision making, government actions, and environmental impacts of human activities in a holistic, interdependent manner (Berberet in Fien, 1993).

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 10 , 1994 , pp. 47 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Bartles, R. 1988, The Semiotic Challenge, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Beder, S. 1989, ‘Towards a More Representative Engineering Education’, International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.173–182.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development, 1992, 12Google Scholar
Council for Environmental Education, WWF UK, Dept of Environment UK. 1993, ‘Environmental Education across the Higher Education Curricula’, Pre-Seminar Report. The Open University, 6 07.Google Scholar
Cowan, R.S. 1989, More Work for Mother - the ironies of household technology. Free Association Bootes, London.Google Scholar
Dept of Education United Kingdom, leaflet - 1993, ‘Environmental Responsibility: An Agenda for Further and Higher Education’, 01.Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. 1992, ‘Going for the science fix’, The Australian, 7 09, p.9.Google Scholar
Fien, J. 1993, Education for the Environment, Deakin University Press. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Greene, D. 1989, Improving Efficiency of Electricity Use - An Assessment of Potential Resources, Electricity Commission of NSW, 03.Google Scholar
House, E.R. 1980, Evaluating with Validity, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
Langreth, R. 1994, ‘The $30 Million Dollar Refrigerator’, Popular Science, 01, pp.65–68.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 1983, Beyond Method, Sage publication, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
O'Heam, G.T. 1982, ‘What is the Purpose of Evaluation?’, The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 3, no. 4, Summer.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development, 1992, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Pearce, D.et al. 1989, Blue Print for a Green Economy, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Pearce, F. 1992, ‘The hidden cost of technology transfer’, New Scientist, no. 1820, 9 05, pp.36–39.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. 1992, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Report of the Commission on the Environment, 1992, Choosing a Sustainable Future, World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E.F. 1973, Small is Beautiful - Economics as if People Mattered, Blond & Briggs Ltd. London.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. 1989a, ‘Evaluation of the Master of Environmental Science Program’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 3, no. 1.Google Scholar
Wood, S. 1993, ‘Who needs green technology?’, Australian Council for Overseas Aid, Discussion paper, 12Google Scholar
Zuber-Skerritt, O. 1991, Action Research for Change and Development, Avebury Gower Publishing Co. Hants, UK.Google Scholar