Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:21:12.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Constructivism: A Goethean Approach to Environmental Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Nigel Hoffmann
Nigel Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
Social Ecology, University of Western Sydney - Hawkesbury
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Environmental education is only at a developmental stage, having originated in response to the environmental problems which have been most pressingly felt in the last thirty years or so. There is a general concern that we do not unconsciously carry into our new philosophies and methodologies the very dysfunctions which led to our environmental problems in the first place. Consequently there has been a search for paradigms of knowledge and enquiry which are adequate for the new problems that we face, paradigms which recognise the essential interrelatedness of all forms of life and the fact that enquirers are themselves part of environments, not just external observers as it is considered in classical rationalist science. The philosophy and method of critical evaluation which goes by the name ‘constructivism’ declares itself to be a way which can lead us beyond the mistakes of earlier theories of knowledge. I will be contending that, rather than being a way beyond rationalism and positivism, the constructivist approach is entirely bound up with that which it seeks to criticise, even if it assumes a radical posture. Out of this critique of constructivism and by way of the ideas of the German philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger and the scientific methods of the poet and ‘nature-philosopher’ Johann von Goethe, I will adumbrate an approach to a new form of environmental education which I believe can satisfy our concern that the problems of the past are not perpetuated in a new guise.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 10 , 1994 , pp. 71 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Adams, G. & Whicher, O. 1982, The Plant between Sun and Earth, Shambhala, Boulder.Google Scholar
Amrine, F., Zucker, F. & Wheeler, H. (eds.) 1987, Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, A. 1959, The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barfield, O. 1965, Saving the Appearances, Harcourt, Brace and World, N.Y.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, L., 1951, ‘Goethe's Concept of Nature’, in Main Currents, vol. 8.Google Scholar
Bockemühl, J. 1951, In Partnership with Nature, Bio-Dynamic Literature, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Bockemühl, J. 1985, 'Elements and Ethers: Modes of Observing the World', in Towards a Phenomenology of the Etheric World, (Ed. Bockemühl, J.), Anthroposophic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Bockemühl, J. 1986, Dying Forests — A Crisis in Consciousness, Hawthorn Press.Google Scholar
Bortoft, H. 1986 [1], Goethe's Scientific Consciousness, Institute for Cultural Research Monograph, P.O. Box 13, Tunbridge Wells, England.Google Scholar
Bortoft, H. 1986 [2], ‘Counterfeit and Authentic Wholes’, in Dwelling, Place and Environment, (Ed. Seamon, D. & Mugerauer, R), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
Brady, R.H. 1987, ‘Goethe's Morphology’, in Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal (Ed. by Amrine, F., Zucker, F. & Wheeler, H.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Cornell, J.F. 1990, ‘Faustian Phenomena: Teleology in Goethe's interpretation of Plants and Animals’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, K.J. 1991, Goethe's History of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fry, T. & Willis, A. 1989, ‘Criticism against the current’, in Meanjin, vol. 48, no. 2.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.G. 1979, Truth and Method, Sheed & Ward, London.Google Scholar
von Goethe, J.W.. 1988, Scientific Studies, Suhrkamp Publishers, N.Y.Google Scholar
Gough, N. 1991, ‘Narrative and Nature: Unsustainable Fictions in Environmental Education’, in Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 7, (08).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. 1990, ‘Can There be a Human Science? Constructivism as an alternative’, in Person Centred Review, vol. 5, no. 2.Google Scholar
Hegge, H. 1987, ‘Theory of Science in the light of Goethe's Science of Nature’, in Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal (Ed. by Amrine, F., Zucker, F. & Wheeler, H.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1969, Identity and Difference, Harper and Row, N.Y.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1971, Poetry, Language and Thought, Harper and Row, N.Y.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper and Row, N.Y.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1992, Being and Time, Blackwell, Oxford & Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1952, The Critique of Judgement, (Trans. Meredith, J.C.), Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. 1987, The Tree of Knowledge, Shambhala, Boston.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1967, The Will to Power, (Trans. Kaufmann, W.), Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Nisbet, H.B. 1972, Goethe and the Scientific Tradition, Institute of Germanic Studies, London.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K.F. 1960, The Existential Revolt, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., N.Y.Google Scholar
Riegner, M. 1992, ‘Goethe's Way of Seeing: Application for Holistic Education’, in Holistic Education, vol. 5, no. 3.Google Scholar
Riegner, M. 1993, ‘Towards a Holistic Understanding of Place: Reading a Landscape though its Flora and Fauna’, in Dwelling, Seeing, and Designing (Ed. by Seamon, D.), State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
Salm, P. 1971, The Poem as Plant, Case Western University Press, Cleveland & London.Google Scholar
Schwenk, T. 1965, Sensitive Chaos: The Creation of Flowing Forms in Water and Air, Rudolf Steiner Press, London.Google Scholar
Seamon, D. 1978, ‘Goethe's Approach to the Natural World: Implications for Environmental Theory and Education’, in Humanistic Geography, (Ed. by Ley, D. & Samuels, M.), Maaroufa Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. 1983, ‘The World Turned Upside Down’, in The New York Review, 10 27.Google Scholar
Second of January Group, 1986, After Truth — A Post-Modern Manifesto, Inventions Press.Google Scholar
Shad, W. 1977, Man and Mammals: Towards a Biology of Form, Waldorf Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Sloan, D. 1991, ‘Goethe and Qualitative Knowledge: A Response to Arnheim’, New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, R. 1979, The Philosophy of Freedom, Rudolf Steiner Press, London.Google Scholar
Steiner, R. 1988 [1], The Science of Knowing, Mercury, N.Y.Google Scholar
Steiner, R. 1988[2], Goethean Science, Mercury, N.Y.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. & Mickunas, A. 1974, Exploring Phenomenology, American Library Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tauber, A.I. 1993, ‘Goethe's Philosophy of Science: Modern Resonances’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, vol. 2no. 36.Google Scholar
White, L. 1992, ‘Social Ecology as Innovative Tertiary Environmental Education’, in Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 8, (08).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M.E. 1990, Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity, Indiana University Press, Bloomingham.Google Scholar