Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T01:39:45.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of the Impact of Preschool Integration on Children Without Disabilities in their First Year of School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Astrid Lepelaar
Affiliation:
Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Coral Kemp*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University Special Education Centre
*
Address for: Coral Kemp, Lecturer, Macquarie University Special Education Centre, Macquarie University Sydney, NSW. Phone: 61 2 98508712 Fax: 61 2 98508254. E-mail: coral.kemp@speced.sed.aq.edu.au

Abstract

Eight children without disabilities who attended an inclusive preschool at Macquarie University Special Education Centre were followed‐up in their first year of school in an attempt to establish whether their preschool program, in particular the inclusion of a high proportion of children with a range of intellectual disabilities, would have a detrimental effect on their subsequent social and academic performance. The current skills of these children, in relation to their peers, were assessed using a range of measures including a teacher interview, a collection of independently evaluated work samples and measures of in‐class behaviour. The academic performance of the children was also compared to the measures of their receptive vocabulary and tests of early reading which were collected towards the end of their preschool year. The academic and social measures taken in the school year indicated that the children’s performance was equal to that of their peers, thereby challenging claims that integrated settings have a negative impact on development. According to the ratings of their early reading and phonemic awareness skills by their kindergarten teachers, these children were performing at or above the level predicted by measures of their language and prereading skills in the preschool.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print (pp. 5591, 293–332). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Allen, K. (1992). The exceptional child: Mainstreaming in early childhood education (2nd edition). Albany: Delmar Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Bailey, D., & Winton, P. (1987). Stability and change in parents’ expectations about mainstreaming. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7, 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochner, S., Denholm, C., & Pieterse, M. (1991). Attitudes on integration in preschool: A comparative study of preschool directors in Canada and Australia. International Journal of Special Education, 6, 279296.Google Scholar
Bricker, D., Bruder, M., & Bailey, E. (1982). Developmental integration of preschool children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 207222.Google Scholar
Bricker, D., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Effectiveness of an early intervention program as indexed by measures of child change. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 4, 1127.Google Scholar
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed., pp. 328375). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3- year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 488503.Google Scholar
Carlberg, C. & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of special Education, 14, 295309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, T. Ruskus, J., Apolloni, T., & Peck, C. (1981). Handicapped children in the mainstream: Background, outcomes and clinical suggestions. Journal of the Division for Early childhood, 4, 7383.Google Scholar
Dempsey, I., & Foreman, P. (1995). Trends and influences in the integration of students with disabilities in Australia. Australasian Journal of special Education, 19, 4753.Google Scholar
Diamond, K., Spiegel-McGill, P., & Hanrahan, P. (1988). Planning for school transition: An ecological-developmental approach. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 245252.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Test manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Esposito, B. (1987). The effects of preschool integration on the development of nonhandicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 3146.Google Scholar
Hollowood, T., Salisbury, C., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M. (1994). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 242253.Google Scholar
Hoyson, M., Jamieson, B., & Strain, P. (1984). Individualised group instruction of normally developing and autistic-like children: The LEAP curriculum model. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 7, 157162.Google Scholar
Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Wrenn, M., Hirose-Hatae, A., & Goetz, L. (1997). Promoting inclusive partnerships in inclusive educational settings. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 33, 127137.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, J., & Gow, L. (1989). Integration in Australia: A research perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 33, 267283.Google Scholar
Johnson, L., Gallagher, R., Cook, M., & Wong, P. (1995). Critical skills for kindergarten: Perceptions from kindergarten teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 315349.Google Scholar
Kemp, C. (1994-98). Time-on-task measures of students with disabilities integrated into mainstream kindergarten classes. Unpublished raw data. Macquarie University Special Education Centre.Google Scholar
Merrett, F., & Wheldall, K. (1986). Observing pupils and teachers in classrooms (OPTIC): A behavioural observation schedule. Educational Psychology, 6, 6870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrett, F., & Wheldall, K. (1990). Effective classroom behaviour management: Positive teaching in the primary school. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Odom, S., Deklyen, M., & Jenkins, J. (1984). Integrating handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers: Developmental impact on nonhandicapped children. Exceptional Children, 51, 4148.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. (1996). Annotation: Contemporary approaches to the teaching of reading. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 139148.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B. Ehri, L.C. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 307342). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1994). Romance and reality. The Reading Teacher, 47, 280291.Google Scholar
Turnball, A., Winton, P., Blacher, J., & Salkind, N. (1983). Mainstreaming in the kindergarten classroom: Perspectives of parents of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early childhood, 6, 1420.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (1994). Twenty years of research on reading: Answers and questions. In Lehr, F. & Osborn, J. (Eds.), Reading language and literacy: Instruction for the twenty first century (pp. 5973). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wolery, M., R., & Brookfield-Norman, J. (1988). (Pre) Academic instruction for handicapped children. In Odom, S. L. & Karnes, M. B. (Eds). Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 109128). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Yopp, H. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 696703.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J., & Algozzine, B. (1995). Special Education: A practical approach for teachers (3rd Ed., pp. 87119). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar