Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-68sx7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:42:45.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research on Special Education in New Zealand – Current State of the Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Keri Wilton
Keri Wilton*
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Special education is usually defined as provisions made for children on the basis of particular and atypical physical or behavioural characteristics they have or manifest. Most current and widely used special education textbooks adopt such a definition, and Havill and Mitchell’s (1972) book — so far the only general New Zealand reference book in this area, is no exception: ‘Special education refers to the facilities, materials and teaching resources provided for children who because of exceptional physical, intellectual, emotional or social characteristics, can not receive maximum benefit from a regular school programme (Havill & Mitchell, 1972 [p.9])’; ‘….provisions brought to bear for children whose teaching needs are beyond the resources usually available in an ordinary school (Ross, 1972 [p. 17]). There is nothing wrong with defining special education in this way. Indeed the fact that a number of children have or show exceptional physical or behavioural characteristics (or can be reliably predicted to do so) is the very foundation upon which special educational provisions are planned and made. What needs equal recognition, however — and is frequently overlooked, is that such provisions will be necessary to the degree that regular classroom provisions are inadequate to accommodate children with special needs. It is possible — indeed probable, that many children are receiving special educational provisions mostly because of the inadequacies of their particular school/classroom situation and not primarily because of any special teaching needs they may have. In this sense, special educational services can be viewed as a type of “Band-Aid” facility — available when regular class provisions are inadequate for particular children because of inadequacies on the part of the teacher (i.e., in teaching ability, understanding of the special needs and learning/behavioural characteristics of the children concerned, etc.) or inadequacies in resources available to the teacher (i.e., equipment, time, etc.). The fact that it is very difficult to ascertain in any particluar case whether a child is receiving special education primarily because of characteristics he/she has or primarily because of characteristics or resources his/her teacher does not have, makes it very difficult to specify the special educational needs of such children, or to design or evaluate special educational provisions vis-a-vis the needs of the children concerned.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , November 1981 , pp. 5 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. S., Wilton, K. M., & Ballard, K. D. Social acceptance of physically handicapped children integrated into regular primary schools. Australian Journal of Special Education, 1978, 2, 9–14.Google Scholar
Barney, W. D. Education of the atypical preschool child. In Havill, S. J. & Mitchell, D. R. (Eds.) Issues in New Zealand special education. Auckland: Hodder & Stoughton, 1972. Pp. 256–271.Google Scholar
Barney, W. D. The role of the state and the voluntary society in the education of preschool children. In Conference Addresses — First South Pacific Regional Conference, International League of Societies for the Mentally Handicapped. Wellington: IHC Society, 1974. Pp 141–147.Google Scholar
Barney, W. D. Who gets to preschool? Wellington: NZCER, 1975.Google Scholar
Barney, W. D. Preschool education for physically and intellectually handicapped children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 1977, 2, 22–35.Google Scholar
Barney, W. D. Handicapped children in kindergartens and playcentres. In O’Rourke, B. & Clough, J. (Eds.) Early Childhood in New Zealand. Auckland: Heinemann, 1978, Pp. 217–226.Google Scholar
Bray, D. A. & Wilton, K. M. Classroom behaviour of intellectually handicapped children and their teachers. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1975, 3, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, W. N. A private expenditure survey of families of handicapped children living in the Waikato region. Unpublished M.Soc.Sci.thesis, University of Waikato, 1973.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. A report on longitudinal evaluations of preschools (Vol. 2). Is early intervention effective? Washington, D.C.: Department of Health Education and Welfare, Publication No. (OHD) 74–25, 1974.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. M. Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock, Arkansas: University of Arkansas, 1978.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. M., Bradley, R. H., & Elardo, R. Early stimulation. In Wortis, J. (Ed.) Mental retardation and developmental disabilities: An annual review. (Vol. 9). New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1975. Pp. 152–194.Google Scholar
Clay, M. M. Learning disorders. In Havill, S. J. & Mitchell, D. R. (Eds.) Issues in New Zealand special education. Auckland: Hodder & Stoughton, 1972. Pp. 230–243.Google Scholar
Clunies-Ross, G. G. Accelerating the development of Down’s syndrome infants and young children. Journal of Special Education, 1979, 13, 169–177.Google Scholar
Codd, J. A. & McIlroy, W. K. Reading and expressive aphasia: A case study. Paper presented at New Zealand Psychological Society Conference, Palmerston North, August 1979.Google Scholar
Coladarci, A. P. The relevancy of educational psychology. Educational Leadership, 1956, 13, 489–492.Google Scholar
Cosson, L. D. Classroom factors and oral language development in mildly retarded children. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 1978.Google Scholar
Ellery, M. D., Blampied, N. M., & Black, W. A. M. Reduction of disruptive behaviour in the classroom: Group and individual reinforcement contingencies compared. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1975, 10, 59–65.Google Scholar
Fry, L. & Thomas, J. D. A behaviour modification approach to rehabilitating behavioural disorders in an adjustment class. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1976, 11, 124–131.Google Scholar
Garber, H. A. & Heber, R. F. The Milwaukee project: Indications of the effectiveness of early intervention in preventing retardation. In Mittler, P. (Ed.) Research to practice in mental retardation. (Vol. 1) Care and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1977. Pp 119–127.Google Scholar
Glass, M. A description and evaluation of special education for backward pupils at primary and intermediate schools in New Zealand. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Massey University, 1977.Google Scholar
Glynn, E. L. & McNaughton, S. S. Trust your own observations: Criterion referenced assessment of reading progress. Slow Learning Child, 1975, 22, 91–108.Google Scholar
Hallinan, P. Thursday’s child has far to go: Counselling parents of handicapped children. In O’Rourke, B. & Clough, J. (Eds.) Early Childhood in New Zealand. Auckland: Heinemann, 1978. Pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
Havill, S. J. & Mitchell, D. R. Issues in New Zealand Special Education. Auckland: Hodder & Stoughton, 1972.Google Scholar
Hayden, A. H. & Haring, N. G. The acceleration and maintenance of developmental gains in Down’s syndrome school-aged children. In Mittler, P. (Ed.) Research to practice in mental retardation (Vol. 1) Care and Intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1977. Pp. 129–141.Google Scholar
Howden-Chapman, P. L. Is retardation reversible? An evaluation of the psychological services of the Mangere early intervention project. Unpublished M. A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1979.Google Scholar
Keane, D. A survey of the graduates of a residential school for the mentally retarded. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1972, 2, 127–131.Google Scholar
Kirk, S. A. & Gallagher, J. L. Educating exceptional children. (3rd ed.) Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979.Google Scholar
Lai, L. S. P. The possibility of maternal involvement in the education of their slow-learning children in primary and secondary special classes in Auckland. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1977.Google Scholar
Lane, M. M. & Mitchell, D. R. Parents’ perceptions of their guidance needs — a survey of parents of children with special needs. Paper presented at 49th ANZAAS Congress, Auckland, January, 1979.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. The integration of visually handicapped pupils in a state secondary school. Unpublished Dip.Ed. thesis, Massey University, 1973.Google Scholar
McAlpine, D. M. & McGrath, D. M. Gifted children. In Havill, S. J. & Mitchell, D. R. (Eds.) Issues in New Zealand special education. Auckland: Hodder & Stoughton, 1972. Pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
McLennan, C. H. G. Comparison of interaction patterns between special class children and children from adjacent regular classes. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, University of Waikato, 1977.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. S. Behaviour modification and reading in a special class. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1974.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. S. Some implications of a technique designed to produce rapid and generalized modification of out-of-seat behaviour. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1975, 10, 120–127.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. W. The probable limits of early intervention programmes for the substantially intellectually retarded. Paper presented to Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Canberra, 1977.Google Scholar
Milofsky, C. D. Why special education isn’t special. Harvard Educational Review, 1974, 44, 437–458.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. R. Project PATH. Paper presented to Early Childhood Care and Development Convention, Christchurch, August 1979.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. A., Beasley, D. M. G., & Williamson, K. I. The intellectually handicapped and their families. Wellington: Research Foundation of N.Z. Society for the Intellectually Handicapped, 1976.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council. Recommended dietary allowances (8th ed.) Washington, D.C.: Food and Nutrition Board NAS/NRG, 1973.Google Scholar
Page, D. G. Teachers’ and parents’ views on special classes for backward children. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Otago, 1974.Google Scholar
Pankhurst, J. D. Children with special needs in New Zealand kindergartens: A national survey. Victoria University of Wellington, Mimeo, 1977.Google Scholar
Pearl, B. A. Preschool-age spina bifida children and some attitudes of their mothers. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1973.Google Scholar
Pickens, K. A. Unpublished degree and diploma studies in education (I). New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1975, 10, 153–175.Google Scholar
Pickens, K. A. Unpublished degree and diploma studies in education (II). New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. 1976, 11, 72–98.Google Scholar
Pickens, K. A. Unpublished degree and diploma studies in education (III). New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1976, 11, 191–217.Google Scholar
Pickens, K. A. Unpublished studies in Education 1975–1978. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1979, 14, 76–95.Google Scholar
Pook, R. & Singh, N. N. The Mangere early-intervention project. Paper presented to New Zealand Psychological Society Conference, Christchurch, August 1978.Google Scholar
Pryde, J. G. The New Zealand economy. Current Affairs Bulletin, 1979, 56, 4–18.Google Scholar
Ross, D. H. Special education: Retrospect and prospect. In Havill, S. J. & Mitchell, D. R. (Eds.) Issues in New Zealand special education. Auckland: Hodder & Stoughton, 1972. Pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Serjeant, B. J. Social contingencies in a special class: Modification of pupil behaviour in a special class for backward pupils by way of differential teacher attention. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1974.Google Scholar
Shuker, G. I. The adjustment class: Room B5. Unpublished Dip.Ed. thesis, University of Auckland, 1974.Google Scholar
Smart, R. F. & Wilton, K. M. Social participation and special class attendance in mildly retarded children. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1975, 10, 66–74.Google Scholar
Smart, R. F., Wilton, K. M., & Keeling, B. Teacher factors and special class placement. Journal of Special Education, 1979. (in press).Google Scholar
Stewart, A. R., & Wilton, K. M. Postschool adjustment of intellectually handicapped school leavers. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1978, 5, 101–104.Google Scholar
Straton, E. A. The dawn start project. Mental Handicap in New Zealand, 1977, 2, 14–35.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. I. Social aspects of deaf employment. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1974.Google Scholar
Thorley, B. J. & Woods, V. M. Early number experiences for preschool Down’s syndrome children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 1979, 4, 15–20.Google Scholar
Tjossem, T. D. (Ed.) Intervention strategies for high-risk infants and young children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Vanden Berg, D. M. The written language of deaf children: A comparative study. Wellington: NZCER 1971 (a).Google Scholar
Vanden Berg, D. M. Characteristics of hearing impaired children in ordinary classes. New Zealand Journal for Teachers of the Deaf, 1972, 4, 24–37.Google Scholar
Vanden Berg, D. M. Children with hearing aids in classes for the normally hearing. Victoria University of Wellington, Mimeo, 1971 (b).Google Scholar
Vincent, A., Wilton, K. M. & Keeling, B. An examination of Christchurch work experience programmes: I. Programme outcomes. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1979, 6, 237–242.Google Scholar
Wildon, C. J. The occupational and social adjustment of experience-class leavers in Otago 1969–73. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Otago, 1974.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. P. A survey of cerebral-palsied children and their mothers. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1975.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. J. S., Wilton, K. M., & McGeorge, C. M. Intentionality judgement and adaptive behaviour in mildly retarded children. Slow Learning Child, 1975, 22, 5–12.Google Scholar
Wilton, K. M. Cultural familial mental retardation and New Zealand special educational provisions. Mental Handicap in New Zealand, 1979, 4, (in press) (a).Google Scholar
Wilton, K. M. Early Intervention: Social and emotional adjustment. Keynote address to Annual Conference of Australian Group for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency, and Australian Association on Mental Retardation, Sydney, 1979. (b) Google Scholar
Wilton, K. M., & Barbour, E. A. Mother-child interaction in high-risk and contrast preschoolers of low socioeconomics status. Child Development, 1978, 49, 1136–1145.Google Scholar
Wilton, K. M. & Cosson, L. D. Employment and adjustment of special class graduates in a New Zealand city. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1977, 4, 3–7.Google Scholar
Wilton, K. M. & Densem, P. A. Social interaction of intellectually handicapped children in integrated and segregated preschools. Exceptional Child, 1977, 24, 165–172.Google Scholar
Wilton, K. M., Vincent, A., & Keeling, B. An examination of Christchurch work experience programmes: II. Programme components. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1979, 6, (in press).Google Scholar
Winterbourn, R. Educating backward children in New Zealand. Wellington: NZCER, 1944.Google Scholar
Witheford, M. A., Wilton, K. M. & Parsons, M. B. Effects of residential school attendance on the social development of hearing handicapped children. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1978, 13, 40–51.Google Scholar
Wotherspoon, A. T. Modification of writing behaviour in a special class: Applications of behaviour modification procedures to writing behaviour in a special class for backward pupils. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1974.Google Scholar