Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:47:52.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mastery Learning: The Achievement of Excellence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Peter Hallinan
Peter Hallinan*
Affiliation:
University College of Central Queensland
*
Correspondence regarding this paper should be directed to the author, U.C.C.Q., Rockhampton, Queensland, 4700.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines and critically evaluates the concept of mastery learning, ranging from its early development by such writers as Bloom and Keller, through to its various applications from preschool to tertiary levels of education, concluding with some speculation about future developments.

Type
Other
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , 1990 , pp. 32 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainscow, M., & Tweddle, D.A. (1988). Preventing classroom failure: An objectives approach. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
Beattie, P., Bond, M. & Wilkinson, M. (1986). Learning Assistance Program Manual: Coordinator’s Handbook. Sherwood, Qld: Brisbane Western Suburbs Education Centre.Google Scholar
Berry, A. (1986, September). Recording outcomes of self-expression activity for special child groups. Art Education, pp. 14–18.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. (1980). The new direction in educational research: Alterable variables. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 382–385.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. (1984). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41, 4–17.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. (1987). A response to Slavin’s mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 507.Google Scholar
Bloom, B., Hastings, J.T., & Madaus, G.F. (1971). Handbook of summative and formative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.M. (1987, February). The Copemican Plan: A concept paper for restructuring high schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators, New Orleans, LA: ERIC ED 281 308.Google Scholar
Chan, L.K.S., Cole, P.G., & Cahill, R.A. (1988). Effect of cognitive entry behavior, mastery level, and information about criterion on third graders’ mastery of number concepts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, P. (1984, September). Fred Keller: The revolutionary gentleman. Psychology Today, pp. 43–48.Google Scholar
Coldeway, D., & Spencer, R.E. (1982). Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction: The search for a basic distance learning paradigm. Distance Education, 3, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, J.C.L., Jennings, P.J., & Atkinson, R.J. (1981). External studies in undergraduate physics: Self-paced learning with laboratory kits. Distance Educations, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosson, L.D., & Fillary, F.L. (1985). Training teachers of mentally retarded children: The Christchurch course. In Singh, N.N. & Wilton, K.M. (Eds.), Mental Retardation in New Zealand: Provisions, Services and Research. Christchurch: Whitcoulls.Google Scholar
Crooks, T.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.Google Scholar
Fields, B.A. (1989). The essentials of teaching (2nd ed.). Toowoomba: Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education.Google Scholar
Foulks, B., & Morrow, R.D. (1989). Academic survival skills for the young child at risk for school failure. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 158–165.Google Scholar
Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1988). Principles of instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gerber, P.J., Banbury, M.M., & Miller, J.H. (1986). Special educators’ perceptions of parental participation in the individual education plan process. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 158–163.Google Scholar
Guskey, T.R., & Gates, S.L. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leadership, 43, 73–80.Google Scholar
Hanline, M.F., & Knowlton, A. (1988). A collaborative model for providing support to parents during their child’s transition from infant intervention to preschool special education public school programs. Journal of the Division Special Education, 12, 116–125.Google Scholar
Horton, S.V., & Lovitt, T.C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. Journal of Special Education, 22, 447–462.Google Scholar
Keller, F.S. (1968). Goodbye teacher.... Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, F.S. (1985a). Testimony of an educational reformer. Engineering Education, 76, 144–148.Google Scholar
Keller, F.S. (1986b). Lightning strikes twice. Teacher of Psychology, 12, 4–8.Google Scholar
Keller, F.S., & Sherman, J.G. (1974). The keller plan Handbook. Menlo Park, CA: W.A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Kennett, B.E. (1982). Individual programming for autistic individuals utilizing the Adaptive Behavior Scale and Family Behavior Profile. Australian Autism Review, 1, 34–40.Google Scholar
Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.-L.C., & Cohen, P.A. (1979). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction. American Psychologist, 34, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcombe, T. (1977). Using the Kent Mathematics Project. Special Education, Forward Trends, 4, 12–15.Google Scholar
Lefrancois, G.R. (1988). Psychology for teaching, (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lindgren, H.C., & Suter, W.N. (1985). Educational psychology in the classroom. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Google Scholar
Maddux, C.D. (1987). Issues and concerns in special education microcomputing. Computers in the schools, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A.C., & Kellington, S.A. (1978). Integrated science for the less able. Remedial Education, 13, 129–134.Google Scholar
Morreau, L., & Anderson, F.E. (1984, November). Individualized education programs in art: Benefit or burden? Art Education, pp. 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J.R., & Dardig, J.C. (1978). Practical task analysis for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 11, 16–18.Google Scholar
Mueller, D.J. (1976). Mastery learning: Partly boon, partly boondoggle. Teachers College Record, 78, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, A.C. (1989). The nature of grading. Clearing House, 62, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D.A. (1982). What are the benefits? Contingency contracting in special classes. Education, 30, 26f.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M.S. (1989). The effects of daily homework assignments on the acquisition of basic skills by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 314–323.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1987). Beyond finding and fixing the deficiencies: Augmenting the clinical model. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 3, 291–296.Google Scholar
Slavin, R.E. (1987). Cooperative learning and individualized instruction. Arithmetic Teacher, 35, 14–16.Google Scholar
Slavin, R.E. (1989). On mastery learning and mastery teaching. Educational Leadership, 46, 77–79.Google Scholar
Smith, J.K., & Katims, M. (1977). Reading in the city: the Chicago Mastery Reading Program. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 199–202.Google Scholar
Stallings, J.A., & Stipek, D. (1986). Research on early childhood and elementary school teaching programs. In Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (1989, November). A cook’s tour of software for students with disabilities. On Line, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
Watson, J.M. (1986). The effect of method of instruction on long-term retention of mathematics concepts. Higher Education Research and Developments, 135–146.Google Scholar
Whitman, T.L., Scibak, J.W., & Reid, D.H. (1983). Behavior modification with the severely and profoundly retarded. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wood, J.W. (1975). Curriculum design for ROSLA pupils, Part 2. Remedial Education, 10, 67–71.Google Scholar