Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T14:42:16.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rating of Largest Claims and Ecomor Reinsurance Treaties for Large Portfolios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Erhard Kremer*
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, WestGermany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the present paper we deal with the problem of calculating a premium for the largest claims and ECOMOR reinsurance treaties. Ammeter derived already in 1964 formulas for calculating the premiums of the largest claims and ECOMOR reinsurance treaties (compare also Seal (1969), Thépaut (1950)), which we will restate in the following Section 2. Lately Benktander (1978) has established an interesting connection between the premiums of the largest claims and excess of loss reinsurance treaties. He proved that the net risk premium of the largest claims treaty covering the p largest claims is bounded by the risk premium of an excess of loss treaty plus p times its priority, which has to be determined such that the mean number of excess claims equals p. Furthermore Benktander showed in examples that the upper bound is quite good in case of the Poisson-Pareto risk process. Nevertheless he did not give a formal proof for the quality of the bound in the Poisson-Pareto case nor for other risk processes.

In the following note we take up this last point and prove that for general risk process Benktander's upper bound is equivalent to the premium of the largest claims reinsurance cover when the size of the collective approaches infinity. Consequently, for large portfolios the risk premium of the largest claims cover may be replaced by the upper bound, e.i., calculated from the premium of the corresponding excess of loss treaty. Moreover we state a similar result for the ECOMOR treaty.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1982

References

Ammeter, H. (1964). The rating of “Largest Claim” reinsurance covers. Quarterly letter from the Algemeene Reinsurance Companies Jubilee, Number 2.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. (1974). Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Grundzüge der Maßtheorie. De Gruyter: Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benktander, G. (1978). Largest claims reinsurance (LCR). A quick method to calculate LCR-risk rates from excess of loss risk rates. ASTIN BULLETIN, 10, 5458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, B. (1972). Correlations between excess of loss reinsurance covers and reinsurance of the n largest claims. ASTIN BULLETIN, 6, 260275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciminelli, E. (1976). On the distribution of the highest claims and its application to the automobile insurance liability. Transactions of the 20th International Congress of Actuaries, 501517.Google Scholar
Kupper, J. (1971). Contributions to the theory of the largest claim cover. ASTIN BULLETIN, 6, 134146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loève, M. (1963). Probability Theory. Van Nostrand: New York.Google Scholar
Seal, H. L. (1969): Stochastic Theory of a Risk Business. Wiley & Sons: New York.Google Scholar
Serfling, R. J. (1980): Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley and Sons: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thépaut, A. (1950): Le traité d'excédent du coût moyen relatif. Bulletin Trimestriel de l'Institut des Actuares Francais, No. 192.Google Scholar