Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T23:36:20.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Viewpoint: How ‘special’ are born-digital collections?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Jackie Dooley*
Affiliation:
OCLC Research and the RLG Partnership, 6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin OH 43017-3395, USA
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pearson, David, ‘Special collections in a digital future’, Art libraries journal 35, no. 1 (2010): 1217.Google Scholar
2. The Digital Preservation Coalition (UK) has a good definition of ‘born digital’ that begins: ‘Digital materials which are not intended to have an analogue equivalent, either as the originating source or as a result of conversion to analogue form’ at http://www.dpconline.org/advice/introduction-definitions-and-concepts.html.Google Scholar
3. See, for example Dooley, Jackie, ‘Ten commandments for special collections librarians in the digital age,’ RBM: a journal of rare books, manuscripts, and cultural heritage 10, no.l (2009): 5159. Originally presented at the ACRL Rare Books and Manuscripts Preconference, Los Angeles, California, 2008.Google Scholar
4. Dooley, Jackie, ‘Do born-digital materials belong “in” special collections?’ Hangingtogether blog, entry posted on November 18, 2009, http://hangingtogether.org/Pp=751 Google Scholar