Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T16:40:53.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art in the digital age: a comparative study of the adoption of electronic visual resources in the UK, Ireland and North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Victoria Brown  and
Catherine Worrall
Victoria Brown*
Affiliation:
History of Art Department, University of Oxford, Suite 9, Littlegate House, St Ebbes, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK
Catherine Worrall*
Affiliation:
The Library, University College Falmouth, Woodlane Campus, Falmouth TR11 4RH, Cornwall, UK
*
Email: victoria.brown@hoa.ox.ac.uk
Email: catherine.worrall@falmouth.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Love it or loathe it, digital is here to stay. This article explores the enormous effect that digital visual media and the ubiquity of the internet have had on the supply and delivery of images at higher education institutions, on both sides of the Atlantic. It observes the levels at which regulated digital visual resources have been adopted and looks at the problems inherent in rapidly evolving technology and the demands of the ‘millennials’ and ‘digital natives’. It also examines the barriers preventing a more fluid adoption of legal, good quality resources and the role that image specialists bring to the mix.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , 2012 , pp. 20 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bridges, Laurie M. and Edmunson-Morton, Tiah, ‘Image-seeking preferences among undergraduate novice researchers,’ Evidence based library and information practice 6, no.1 (2011): 24.Google Scholar
2. Gramstadt, Marie-Therese, ‘Changing light: a plethora of digital tools as slides gasp their last?’, CHArt conference proceedings vol.13 (2010), http://www.chart.ac.uk/chart2010//papers/gramstad.html.Google Scholar
3. Visual Resources Association, Advocating for visual resources management in educational and cultural institutions (October 2009), http://www.vraweb.org/resources/general/vra_white_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
4. Davies, Matt, ‘A licence to scan: the visual resource professional in UK higher education and the digital image copyright dilemma,’ Art libraries journal 37, no.2 (2012): 15–19.Google Scholar
5. VRCs are hubs that often developed out of slide libraries, the name reflecting an expansion into different media (including photographs, books, videos and DVDs). Since the shift from analogue to digital, VRCs have provided digital image resources and services, supported by visual resources professionals.Google Scholar
6. Green, David, ‘Using digital images in teaching and learning: perspectives from liberal arts institutions’, Academic commons (October 2006), http://www.academiccommons.org/imagereport/.Google Scholar
7. Bergstrom, Tracy, ‘A content analysis of visual resources collection web sites’, Art documentation 8, no.1 (2009).Google Scholar
8. VRA + ARLIS/NA Conference 2011 programme; workshop summary, http://vraarlis 1 Lsched.org/event/e282fl 817bf3566bd712482a9656bbf4/.Google Scholar
9. VRA + ARLIS/NA Conference presentations, http://www.slideshare.net/event/vra-arlisna-2nd-joint-conference-2011/slideshows/.Google Scholar
10. Gramstadt, Marie-Therese, ‘Changing light,’ (2010).Google Scholar
11. Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/.Google Scholar
12. Davies, Matt, ‘A licence to scan’ (2011).Google Scholar
13. DACS, Design and Artists Copyright Society, http://www.dacs.org.uk/.Google Scholar
14. Copyright Licensing Agency, http://www.cla.co.uk/licences/licences_available/he/uuk/basic_he_licence/.Google Scholar
15. Email from Katie Hambrook, ‘CLA image developments,’ 6 December 2011.Google Scholar
16. Intellectual Property Office, http://www.ipo.gov.uk/.Google Scholar
17. UK Copyright Service, ‘Using the copyright work of others,’ http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p27_work_of_others/.Google Scholar
18. US Copyright Office, ‘Fair Use,’ http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fll02.html.Google Scholar
19. Association of Research Libraries, Code of best practices in fair use for academic and research libraries, http://www.arl.org/pp/ppcopyright/codefairuse/index.shtml.Google Scholar
20. Visual Resources Association, Statement on fair use of images for teaching, research and study, http://www.vraweb.org/organization/pdf/VRAFairUseGuidelinesFinal.pdf.Google Scholar
21. Xpert Attribution Tool, Nottingham University, http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/.Google Scholar
22. ACADI blog, http://acadi.wordpress.com/.Google Scholar
23. UCAS Media release, http://www.ucas.com/about_us/media_enquiries/media_releases/2012/20120130.Google Scholar
24. Hilker, Christine and Webster, Margaret, ‘Preliminary statistics from the VRA Professional Status Survey as they relate to “Common threads: libraries and visual resources collection merging, partnering, and finding new ways to work together”’, VRA bulletin 36, no.2 (summer 2009): 81.Google Scholar
25. Shelf, Shared, http://www.artstor.org/shared-shelf/s-html/shared-shelf-home.shtml.Google Scholar