Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T16:40:08.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art archives: a common concern of archivists, librarians, and museum professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Antje B. Lemke*
Affiliation:
School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The preservation of artists’ papers and other art source material has steadily increased since the Second World War. Art archives include national repositories, archives attached to museums and libraries, archives devoted to a single person or institution, and ‘multiple collection archives’. Archival materials range from manuscript and photographic records to original works of art. Some archival materials have been published in microform formats; many others have not, and potential users depend on being able to locate them by means of various finding aids. Unless supported by public funds, the archives themselves depend on grants or sponsorship. Art archives may be staffed by archivists, museum curators, or librarians; future developments require not merely cooperation but also a ‘harmonization’ of these three professions, and a critical approach to the application of new technologies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kimball, Fiske. ‘Letter to John Jenks’. December 15, 1942. Files of Philadelphia Museum of Art Archives.Google Scholar
2.Art Archives show at museum here’. Philadelphia Bulletin January 28, 1943.Google Scholar
3. Corcoran, Kathryn L. and Sanford, John. A Guide to the Archives of the Albright-Knox Art Gallery. Buffalo, N.Y. Albright-Knox Art Gallery 1987.Google Scholar
4. Peckham, Howard E. ‘The Treasure-House libraries’. Saturday Review July 13, 1968 p.6163.Google Scholar
5. Fleckner, John A.The Archivist speaks to the museum profession.’ Museum News vol.63, no.1, October/November 1986.Google Scholar
6. Museum Association/Society of Archivists/Library Association. ‘Statement of Policy relating to archives’. Museum Journal vol.81, December 1981 p.165169.Google Scholar
7. Allen, Nancy. ‘The Museum Prototype Project: A View from the Library’. Library Trends vol.37, no.2. Fall 1988 p.174193.Google Scholar
8. Glissant, Edward. ‘Editorial’. The Courier vol. 35, no.2, February 1985 p.1.Google Scholar
9. De Silva, G.P. S.H. ‘Archives in developing countries: Sri Lanka, a case study within Asia’. UNESCO Journal of Information Science, Librarianship, and Archives Administration vol.4, no.2, 1982 p.8193.Google Scholar
10. Fawcett, Trevor. ‘Too much to look at, too much to read.’ Art Libraries Journal vol.12, no.3, 1987 p.510.Google Scholar
11. Crump, Charles G. “Records” in Encyclopedia Britannica. 11th edition, 1911. vol.22 p.958966.Google Scholar
12. Markey, Karen. Access to Iconographical Research Collections. Library Trends vol.37, no.2, Fall 1988 p.154174.Google Scholar