Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T07:21:48.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use and meaning of materials in the garden of the Villa d'Este at Tivoli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

David Dernie
David Dernie
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, Department of Architecture and Building Technology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regardless of theoretical approach, architectural ideas are ultimately embodied in materials. While contemporary buildings are often brimming with architectural theories, they frequently flounder at the attempt to translate these ideas into materials. The uncertainty of this contemporary architectural climate is powerfully mirrored in the artistic language of mannerism. Rejecting the tenets of the Renaissance, and inspired by new discoveries, the italian architect of the late sixteenth century sought to reformulate architectural language. Founded on an increasingly encyclopaedic knowledge of the antique world, this language was to represent a new understanding of nature and involved an exploration of natural materials in a way unimaginable in the early Renaissance. This paper describes the garden of the Villa d'Este at Tivoli, a masterpiece from this period where materials themselves resonated with significance. Based on the author's iconographic interpretation of the garden, it draws on original eyewitness descriptions of the effects of water, light and sounds.

Type
Theory
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , Spring 1997 , pp. 64 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartari, V. (1571). Le Imagini De i Dei De Gli Antichi Nelle Quali Si Contengono Gl'ldoli, Riti Ceremonie & Altre Cose Appartenenti Alla Religione De Gli Antichi, Venice.Google Scholar
Foglietta, U. (1569). Opera Uberti Foglietae, Tiburtinum Hippolyti Cardinalis Ferrariensis ad Flavium Ursinum Card Amplissimum, Rome.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1994). L'umanesimo italiano, Editori Laterza, Rome, p. 218 (first published 1952).Google Scholar
Jansen, H. W. (1961). The Image Made by Chance in Renaissance Thought in Essays in Honour of Erwin Panovsky ed. Meiss, M., New York.Google Scholar
Ligorio, P. (a). Libri dell'antichita, Vols. I–XXXI, 1545–1553.Google Scholar
Ligorio, P. (b). Grottesche. in Libro dell'antichità, VI, pp. 151–161.Google Scholar
Ligorio, P. (c). Diana Efesia, in Libro dell'antichità, ms. a.ll.14.J.27.Google Scholar
Ovid, (a), Metamorphoses, trans. Melville, A.D., (1986). Oxford, xv, pp. 229–262.Google Scholar
Ovid, (b), Metamorphoses, trans. Melville, A.D., (1986). Oxford, i, pp. 398–432.Google Scholar
Penna, A. (1972). La Sibilla Tiburtina e le Nove Età del Mondo in Atti e Memorie dell Società Tiburtina di Storie e d'arte 45, pp. 7–95.Google Scholar
Trenchmann, E.J. (trans. 1929). The Diary of Montaigne's Journey to Italy 1580–1581, London, p.166.Google Scholar
Vasari, (1960). On Technique, Dover Publications, New York, p. 86. (First published in 1550.)Google Scholar
Woldbye, V (1984). Shells and the decorative arts, in Apollo, V. pp. 156–161.Google Scholar