Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:12:34.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In support of hybridity. A response to Stephennie Mulder, Ian Straughn and Ruth Young

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

Trinidad Rico
Trinidad Rico*
Affiliation:
Department of Art History, Rutgers University, USA
*
Email: trinidad.rico@rutgers.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , December 2021 , pp. 127 - 132
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, A. and Young, R., 2016: Historical archaeology and heritage in the Middle East. A preliminary overview, Historical archaeology 50(4), 22–35.10.1007/BF03379198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y., and Infantidis, F., 2015: The photographic and the archaeological. The ‘other Acropolis’, in Carabott, P., Hamilakis, Y. and Papargyriou, E. (eds), Camera Graeca. Photographs, narratives, materialities, Farnham, 133–57.Google Scholar
ICOMOS, 2008: 18 April 2008. The International Day for Monuments and Sites. Religious heritage and sacred places. ICOMOS secretariat memo, available at www.icomos.org/18thapril/2008/18042008-e.pdf.Google Scholar
Labadi, S., 2013: UNESCO, cultural heritage, and outstanding universal value. Value-based analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions, Lanham.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. (ed.), 1998: Archaeology under fire. Nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, London.10.4324/9780203259320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L., 2005: Sites of violence. Terrorism, tourism, and heritage in the archaeological present, in L. Meskell and P. Pels (eds), Embedding ethics, Oxford, 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ousterhout, R., forthcoming. Temple of the world’s desire. Hagia Sophia in the American press, ca. 1910–1927, in E. Neumeier and B. Anderson (eds), Hagia Sophia in the long nineteenth century.Google Scholar
Pollock, S., and Bernbeck, R. (eds), 2005: Archaeologies of the Middle East. Critical perspectives, Malden (Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology).Google Scholar
Rico, T., 2014. Islamophobia and the location of heritage debates in the Arabian peninsula, in Exell, K. and Rico, T. (eds), Cultural heritage in the Arabian peninsula. Debates, discourses and practices, Farnham, 19–32.Google Scholar
Rico, T., 2016: Constructing destruction. Heritage narratives in the tsunami city, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, T., 2017c: Searching for Islam in heritage practices and debates, in The ‘heritage’ boom in the Gulf. Critical and interdisciplinary perspectives, special issue of the Journal of Arabian studies 7(2), 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, T., 2019a. Heritage failure and its public. Thoughts on the preservation of Old Doha, Qatar, Public Historian 41(1), 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, T., 2019b: Islam, heritage, and preservation. An untidy tradition, Material religion. The journal of objects, art and belief 15(2), 148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, T., 2020b: The restricted heritage significance of historic mosques in Qatar, (In)significance. Values and valuing in heritage, special issue of the International journal of heritage studies 26(9), 874–84.Google Scholar
Rico, T., 2021: Modernism in Qatar. Survival through reuse, in Fabbri, R. and Al-Qassemi, S.S. (eds), Urban modernity in the contemporary Gulf. Obsolescence and opportunities, Abingdon, 234–53.Google Scholar
Rico, T., forthcoming: Global heritage, religion, and secularism, Cambridge.Google Scholar