Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:28:57.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monitoring phoneme acquisition for making treatment withdrawal decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Lesley B. Olswang  and
Barbara A. Bain
Lesley B. Olswang*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Barbara A. Bain
Affiliation:
University of Montana
*
Lesley B. Olswang, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, JG–15, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined phoneme acquisition in three phonologically impaired children to determine whether treatment needed to be provided continually until correct productions were consistently observed during conversation. This was done by examining the effects of withdrawing treatment on several target phonemes at predetermined performance levels. In addition, production of the target behaviors in untrained single words versus connected speech was compared as measures for monitoring progress during the phoneme acquisition process. Both ABA(B) and multiple baseline time series designs were employed. The results indicated two general patterns of phoneme acquisition. In one, the children continued to progress in phoneme acquisition, even though direct treatment on the target behavior had been withdrawn relatively early in the acquisition process. In the other, the children failed to continue their progress in phoneme acquisition when treatment was withdrawn, requiring the reintroduction of treatment until high levels of correct production were maintained over several weeks. In all cases, production of the target behavior in untrained single words and connected speech reflected a similar phoneme acquisition trend.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 17 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernthal, J., & Bankson, N. (1980). Articulation disorders. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Carrow, E. (1973). Test for auditory comprehension of language. Austin: Learning Concepts.Google Scholar
Compton, A., & Hutton, J. S. (1978). Compton-Hutton phonological assessments. Haywood, CA: Carousel House.Google Scholar
Diedrich, W., & Bangert, J. (1980). Articulation learning. Houston, Texas: College-Hill Press, Inc.Google Scholar
DuBois, E., & Bernthal, J. (1978). A comparison of three methods for obtaining articulatory responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbert, M., Shelton, R., & Arndt, W. (1967). A task for evaluation of articulation change: 1. Development of methodology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 281–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faircloth, M., & Faircloth, S. (1970). An analysis of the articulatory behavior of a speech defective child in connected speech and in isolated word responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 35, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H., & Logemann, J. (1971). The Fisher-Logemann test of articulation competence. Boston: Houghton.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1976). The roles of experience in the development of behavior and the nervous system. In Gottlieb, G. (Ed.), Studies on the development of behavior and the nervous system: Neural and behavioral specificity, New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, F., & Lahey, B. (1982). Subject reactivity in direct observational assessment: A review and critical analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 2, 523–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, B. (1982). Remediation of speech patterns associated with low levels of phonological performance. In Crary, M. (Ed.), Phonological intervention, Houston: College Hill Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1976). Phonological disability in children. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1981). Procedures for the phonological analysis of children's language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., Winney, B., & Pederson, O. (1980). Single word versus connected speech articulation testing. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 11, 175–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Prutting, C., Perozzi, J., & Berkley, R. (05 1978). Nonstandardized approaches to the assessment of language behaviors. ASHA, 20, 371–579.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Mower, D. (1982). Methods of modifying speech behaviors. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Prather, E., Hedrick, D., & Kern, C. (1975). Articulation development in children aged two to four years. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 179–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Shelton, R., Elbert, M., & Arndt, W. (1967). A task for evaluation of articulation change: II. Comparison of task scores during baseline and lesson series testing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 578–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, L., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982a). Phonological disorders: I. A diagnostic classification system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 226–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, L., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982b). Phonological disorders III. A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C., & Dunn, C. (in press). Normal and disordered phonology in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. E., Lillywhite, H. S., & Gordon, M. E. (1980). Clinical management of articulation disorders. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Weston, A. J., & Leonard, L. B. (1976). Articulation disorders: Methods of evaluation and therapy. Lincoln, NB: Cliffs Notes, Inc.Google Scholar
Winitz, H. (1975). From syllable to conversation. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar