Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T07:50:10.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of manual interference and reading level on deaf subjects' recall of word lists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Theodore Siedlecki Jr ,
Marianne C. Votaw ,
John D. Bonvillian  and
I. King Jordan
Theodore Siedlecki Jr
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Marianne C. Votaw
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
John D. Bonvillian*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
I. King Jordan
Affiliation:
Gallaudet University
*
John D. Bonvillian, Department of Psychology, Gilmer Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2477
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the effect of a manual interference task on deaf and hearing college students' written free recall under both immediate- and delayed-recall conditions. The stimuli consisted of printed English words that varied on signability (i.e., words that could be expressed by a single sign) and visual imagery. The manual interference task had a small adverse effect on the deaf students' recall, but this effect did not appear to be related to the use of a kinesthetic sign-based coding strategy. It was also found than the deaf subjects' reading levels were very strongly related to their level of word recall; the better deaf readers recalled more than 50% more words than the poorer readers. Ratings of the deaf subjects' speech intelligibility, however, were not related to their level of word recall.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 185 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D. (1966). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Patterson, K. (1971). The relationship between long-term and short-term memory. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, F. X. (1957). A study of the visual memory of deaf and hearing children. American Annals of the Deaf, 102, 254–263.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, J. D. (1983). Effects of signability and imagery on word recall of deaf and hearing students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 775–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonvillian, J. D., Charrow, V. R., & Nelson, K. E. (1973). Psycholinguistic and educational implications of deafness. Human Development, 16, 321–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonvillian, J. D., Orlansky, M. D., & Garland, J. B. (1982). Handedness patterns in deaf persons. Brain and Cognition, 1, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonvillian, J. D., Rea, C. A., Orlansky, M. D., & Slade, L. A. (1987). The effect of sign language rehearsal on deaf subjects' immediate and delayed recall of English word lists. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, P., & Blake, J. (1974). Visual short-term memory in the hearing and the deaf. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charrow, V. R., & Fletcher, J. D. (1974). English as the second language of deaf children. Developmental Psychology, 10, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
College Entrance Examination Board. (1984). Degrees of reading power. New York: College Board.Google Scholar
Conlin, D., & Paivio, A. (1975). The associative learning of the deaf: The effects of word imagery and signability. Memory & Cognition, 3, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child: Language and cognitive function. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cornoldi, C., & Sanavio, E. (1980). Imagery value and recall in deaf children. Italian Journal of Psychology, 7, 33–39.Google Scholar
Craig, E. M. (1973). The role of mental imagery in the free-recall of deaf, blind, and normal subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dawson, E. H. (1983). Sign mediation in a word recognition task. In Kyle, J. G. & Woll, B. (Eds.), Language in sign: An international perspective on sign language (pp. 195–205). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Degrees of reading power norms, all forms. (1988). Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language: Implications of encoding strategy for order recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 572–583.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanson, V. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition, 15, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartung, J. (1970). Visual perceptual skill, reading ability, and the young deaf child. Exceptional Children, 36, 603–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, C. M., & Quigley, S. P. (1985). Reading and deafness. San Diego, CA: College-Hill.Google Scholar
Koslin, B., Zeno, S., & Koslin, S. (1987). The DRP: An effectiveness measure in reading. New York: College Board.Google Scholar
Kyle, J. G. (1980). Sign language and internal representation. In Ahlgren, I. & Bergman, B. (Eds.), Papers from the first international symposium on sign language research (pp. 207–221). Leksand: Swedish National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Kyle, J. G. (1981). Signs and memory: The search for the code. In Woll, B., Kyle, J., & Deuchar, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on British Sign Language and deafness (pp. 71–88). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, E. H. (1983). The relationships between reading processes and English skills of deaf students: Part I and Part II. Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, E. H. (1984). Deaf working memory processes and English language skills. In Martin, D. S. (Ed.), International symposium on cognition, education, and deafness: Working papers (Vol. 2, pp. 331–360). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L., & Locke, V. L. (1971). Deaf children's phonetic, visual, and dactylic coding in a grapheme recall task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max, L. W. (1937). Experimental study of the motor theory of consciousness: IV. Action-current responses in the deaf during awakening, kinaesthetic imagery and abstract thinking. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 301–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuigan, F. J. (1971). Covert linguistic behavior in deaf subjects during thinking. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75, 417–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moores, D. F. (1987). Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles, and practices (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Moulton, R. D., & Beasley, D. S. (1975). Verbal coding strategies used by hearing-impaired individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 559–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, P. B., Blanton, R. L., & Mclntyre, C. K. (1970). Coding medium and word recall by deaf and hearing subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 54–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 76(1, Pt. 2).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shand, M. (1982). Sign-based short-term coding of ASL signs and printed words by congenitally deaf signers. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siple, P., & Brewer, L. (1985). Individual differences in coding strategies for short-term retention of signs. In Stokoe, W. & Volterra, V. (Eds.), SLR '83: Proceedings of the third international symposium on sign language research (pp. 109–119). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Sisco, F. H., & Anderson, R. J. (1978). Current findings regarding the performance of deaf children on the WISC-R. American Annals of the Deaf, 123, 115–121.Google ScholarPubMed
Stokoe, W. C. Jr, Casterline, D., & Croneberg, C. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Trybus, R. J., & Karchmer, M. A. (1977). School achievement scores of hearing impaired children: National data on achievement status and growth patterns. American Annals of the Deaf, 122, 62–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Vernon, M. (1968). Fifty years of research on the intelligence of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A review of the literature and discussion of implications. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
Waters, G. S., Komoda, M. K., & Arbuckle, T. Y. (1985). The effects of concurrent tasks on reading: Implications for phonological recoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, B. U, Sullivan, P. M., Moeller, M. P., & Jensen, J. K. (1982). Nonverbal intelligence and English language ability in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, R. D., Madsen, W. J., & Wilson, M. P. (1986). Assessment of student communication skills: The communication profile. A description of procedures. Unpublished manuscript, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar