Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T10:41:07.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conversational coordination: Collaboration for effective communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Richard J. Ricard
Richard J. Ricard*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
*
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX77843–4233
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This investigation focused on early school-aged children's ability to negotiate shared reference in a task-oriented communication game. Conversational partners worked together on initiating and refining mutually acceptable referential labels for a series of abstract figures. Each child participated as both a sender and a matcher. In Experiment 1, developmental trends in the use of conversational strategies such as utterance-contingent queries, acknowledgments, and negations were observed. However, communicative efficiency was disrupted when the children switched dyadic roles. They reintroduced figures with novel labels when switching to a speaking role from a previous matching role, and vice versa. In Experiment 2, communicative efficiency was again disrupted at the point of role switch, even when the children were given feedback designed to minimize cross-role inconsistency. Interestingly, in both experiments, communicative inefficiency did not reduce a dyad's overall communicative success. These results suggest that, while children are in the process of learning how best to coordinate the use of conversational strategies and procedural rules, they still manage effective communication, albeit with a little extra effort.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 387 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, B. P. (1981). When is a question not answered? The understanding of young children of utterances violating or conforming to the rules of conversational sequencing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. P. (1982). Children's use of contextual expectations to detect and resolve comprehension failures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1987). Instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In Neisser, U. (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101–140). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Rocissano, L. & Hood, L. (1976). Adult-child discourse: Developmental interaction between information processing and linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Psychology,8, 521–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A. & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understandin. In Flavell, J. H. & Markman, E. H. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In Lindzay, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 654–682). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A. K., Saf, I., & Webber, B. (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22,1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickson, W. P. (Ed.). (1981). Children's oral and communication skills. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Fussell, S. & Krauss, R. W. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C. (1972). Investigation of child-adult differences in problem-solving communication.(Project Report, U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare)Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. & Krauss, R. M. (1967). What do people say after they have learned to talk? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 13, 309–316.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation: The William James Lectures, Harvard University, 1967-1968. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M. & Glucksberg, S. (1977). Social and nonsocial speech. Scientific American,236, 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Weinheimer, S. & Vivehananthan, P. S. (1968). “Inner speech” and “external speech”: Characteristics and communication effectiveness of socially and nonsocially encoded messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, E. M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 61–84). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ricard, R. J. & Snow, C. E. (1990). Language skills in and out of context. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E. J. (1981). The child's understanding of inadequate messages and communication failure: A problem of ignorance or egocentrism? In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 167–188). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Schober, M. F. & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M. (1983). Communication. In Flavell, J. H. & Markman, E. H. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 841–890). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sonnenschein, S. & Whitehurst, G. (1984a). Developing referential communication: A hierarchy of skills. Child Development, 55,1936–1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenschein, S. & Whitehurst, G. (1984b). Developing referential communication skills: The interaction of role-switching and difference rule training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar