Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:51:44.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond accuracy: Heritage speakers’ performance on two kinds of acceptability judgment tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Eve C. Zyzik  and
Ruben A. Sanchez
Eve C. Zyzik*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Ruben A. Sanchez
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ezyzik@UCSC.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the performance of heritage speakers (HSs) on two types of acceptability judgment tasks (AJTs) as well as their corresponding confidence ratings. Data were collected from 75 native speakers of Spanish who were subsequently divided into three groups: Spanish monolinguals, Spanish-dominant HSs, and English-dominant HSs. An AJT targeting morphosyntax (Task 1) showed that all groups were affected by task stimulus, that is, they were significantly less accurate on the ungrammatical items. A lexically focused AJT (Task 2) revealed the tendency of HSs to accept complex words that are possible yet not attested. Confidence ratings on both tasks were very high overall, and there was a significant relationship between accuracy and confidence. Thus, the data question the assumption made in a number of previous studies that HSs suffer from a lack of certainty in their linguistic intuitions. Finally, between-group effects show that the Spanish-dominant HS group was not different from the monolingual group on Task 1, yet there were significant differences between all three groups on Task 2. By comparing morphosyntactic and lexical phenomena on two tasks administered in the same modality, this research contributes to the discussion of vulnerable domains in heritage language bilingualism.

Keywords

acceptability judgmentsconfidence ratingsheritage speakerslanguage dominanceSpanish
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 645 - 671
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 115–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., & Bidgood, A. (2013). The retreat from overgeneralization in child language acquisition: Word learning, morphology, and verb argument structure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 47–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Amengual, M. (2016). Acoustic correlates of the Spanish tap-trill contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 13, 88–112.Google Scholar
Amengual, M. (2018). Asymmetrical interlingual influence in the production of Spanish and English laterals as a result of competing activation in bilingual language processing. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amengual, M., & Chamorro, P. (2015). The effects of language dominance in the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 72, 207–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Computer Software]. Vienna, Austria: R Corporation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Bayram, F., Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Kupisch, T., Miller, D., Puig-Mayenco, E., & Westergaard, M. (2017). Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: Passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 129–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual Language Profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. Available at https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual/ Google Scholar
Boon, E., & Polinsky, M. (2014). From silence to voice: Empowering heritage language speakers in the 21st century. Informes del Observatorio/Observatorio’s Reports 002.Google Scholar
Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2010). The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: The case of pre-pubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics, 31, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2002). Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s-1900s. Available at http://www.corpusdelespanol.org Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322–1338.Google Scholar
Eddington, D. (2004). Spanish phonology and morphology: Experimental and quantitative perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, D. (2017). Dialectal variation in Spanish diminutives: A performance model. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 10, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M. (2011). Testing the lexical recognition task with Spanish/English bilinguals in the United States. Language Testing, 28, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C., Rinke, E., & Rato, A. (2017). Comparing the outcomes of early and late acquisition of European Portuguese: An analysis of morpho-syntactic and phonetic performance. Heritage Language Journal, 14, 124–149.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1994). The reliability of second-language grammaticality judgments. In Tarone, E., Gass, S. & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 303–322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gertken, L. M., Amengual, M., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Assessing language dominance with the Bilingual Language Profile. In Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A. & Hilton, H. (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 208–225).Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J. H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G. H., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 594–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 423–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2015). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G., Jegerski, J., & VanPatten, B. (2016). Online processing of subject pronouns in monolingual and heritage bilingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, L. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2013). A new term for a better distinction? A view from the higher end of the proficiency scale. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., Lein, T., Barton, D., Schröder, D. J., Stangen, I., & Stoehr, A. (2014). Acquisition outcomes across domains in adult simultaneous bilinguals with French as weaker and stronger language. Journal of French Language Studies, 24, 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22, 564–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llombart-Huesca, A. (2017). Morphological awareness and spelling in Spanish heritage language learners. Linguistics and Education, 37, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide. London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2018). Heritage language development: Connecting the dots. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22, 530–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Girju, R. (2015). Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as heritage languages. Language, 91, 564–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (2009). Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of differential object marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I., & Foote, R. (2014). Early language experience facilitates the processing of gender agreement in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 118–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Foote, R. (2014). Age of acquisition interactions in bilingual lexical access: A study of the weaker language of L2 learners and heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 274–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, E., & Price, M. (2015). Measuring consciousness with confidence ratings. In Overgaard, M. (Ed.), Behavioral methods in consciousness research (pp. 159–180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orfitelli, R., & Polinsky, M. (2017). When performance masquerades as comprehension. Grammaticality judgments in experiments with non-native speakers. In Kopotev, M., Lyashevskaya, O. & Mustajoki, A. (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to the Russian language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Otwinowska, A., & Szewczyk, J. M. (2017). The more similar the better? Factors in learning cognates, false cognates and non-cognate words. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D. (2016). Syntactic reflexes of emerging optionality in Spanish as a heritage language: The case of dative-experiencer verbs. Hispania, 99, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2016). Looking ahead. In Pascual y Cabo, D. (Ed.), Advances in Spanish as a heritage language (pp. 325–345). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R. (2013). Linguistic insecurity forty years later. Journal of English Linguistics, 41, 304–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., & Zeigler, N. (2013). Implicit and explicit knowledge of form-meaning connections: Evidence from subjective measures of awareness. In Bergsleithner, J. M., Frota, S. N. & Yoshioka, J. K. (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 255–275). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Rinke, E., & Flores, C. (2014). Morphosyntactic knowledge of clitics by Portuguese heritage bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J., Révész, A., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Implicit and explicit knowledge of inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 781–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2014). A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics, 35, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., & Ledger, G. W. (1979). Grammaticality judgments, sentence repetitions and sentence corrections of children learning to read. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 6, 23–40.Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2014). Judgment data. In Podesva, R. J. & Sharma, D. (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 27–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., & Polinsky, M. (2015). Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherkina-Lieber, M., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., & Johns, A. (2011). Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiu, L. J., Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2018). Exploring second language learners’ grammaticality judgment performance in relation to task design features. System, 72, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2018). Simultaneous bilingualism: Early developments, incomplete later outcomes? International Journal of Bilingualism. doi: 10.1177/1367006916652061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonet, M. (2014). Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2000). Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Keller, F. (2005). Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua, 115, 1497–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E. (2014). Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1229–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 860–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J., Daller, M., Furman, R., & Rothman, J. (2016). Ultimate attainment in the use of collocations among heritage speakers of Turkish in Germany and Turkish–German returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 504–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunney, R. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1060–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyzik, E. (2016). Toward a prototype model of the heritage language learner. In Beaudrie, S. & Fairclough, M. (Eds.), Innovative approaches in heritage language teaching (pp. 19–38). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar