No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
NEW GENERALIZED 
$h$-IMPLICATIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 May 2017
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
A new generalized class of fuzzy implications, called (
$h,f,g$)-implications, is introduced and discussed in this paper. The results show that the new fuzzy implications possess some good properties, such as the left neutrality property and the exchange principle.
MSC classification
Primary:
03B50: Many-valued logic
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2017 Australian Mathematical Society
References
Baczyński, M. and Jayaram, B., “Yager’s classes of fuzzy implications: some properties and intersections”, Kybernetika
43 (2007) 157–182; http://eudml.org/doc/33849.Google Scholar
Baczyński, M. and Jayaram, B., Fuzzy implications (Springer, Berlin, 2008); doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69082-5.Google Scholar
Dubois, D. and Prade, H., “Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning (I)”, Fuzzy Sets Syst.
40 (1991) 143–202; doi:10.1016/0165-0114(91)90050-Z.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Torrens, J., “An overview of fuzzy logic connectives on the unit interval”, Fuzzy Sets Syst.
281 (2015) 183–187; doi:10.1016/j.fss.2015.05.016.Google Scholar
Gottwald, S., A treatise on many-valued logics,
Volume 9 of Studies in Logic and Computation
(Research Studies Press Ltd, Baldock, 2001).Google Scholar
Hilnena, D., Kalina, M. and Kral, P., “A class of implications related to Yager’s
$f$
-implications”, Inform. Sci.
260 (2014) 171–184; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.09.045.Google Scholar
$f$
-implications”, Inform. Sci.
260 (2014) 171–184; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.09.045.Google ScholarLiu, H. W., “A new class of fuzzy implications derived from generalized
$h$
-generators”, Fuzzy Sets Syst.
24 (2013) 63–92; doi:10.1016/j.fss.2012.11.022.Google Scholar
$h$
-generators”, Fuzzy Sets Syst.
24 (2013) 63–92; doi:10.1016/j.fss.2012.11.022.Google ScholarMas, M., Monserrat, M., Torrens, J. and Trillas, E., “A survey on fuzzy implications functions”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.
15 (2007) 1107–1121; doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.896304.Google Scholar
Massanet, S. and Torrens, J., “On the characterization of Yager’s implications”, Inform. Sci.
201 (2012) 1–18; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.03.008.Google Scholar
Massanet, S. and Torrens, J., “On a new class of fuzzy implications:
$h$
-implications and generalizations”, Inform. Sci.
181 (2014) 2111–2127; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$h$
-implications and generalizations”, Inform. Sci.
181 (2014) 2111–2127; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPei, D., “
$R_{0}$
implication: characteristics and applications”, Fuzzy Sets Syst.
131 (2002) 297–302; doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00053-2.Google Scholar
$R_{0}$
implication: characteristics and applications”, Fuzzy Sets Syst.
131 (2002) 297–302; doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00053-2.Google ScholarPei, D., “The unified algorithms of triple I methods for fuzzy reasoning”, Inform. Sci.
178 (2008) 520–530; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. J., “On the logic foundation of fuzzy reasoning”, Inform. Sci.
117 (1999) 47–88; doi:10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10103-2.Google Scholar
Xie, A. F. and Liu, H. W., “A generalization of Yager’s
$f$
-generated implications”, Internat. J. Approx. Reason.
54 (2013) 35–46; doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2012.08.005.Google Scholar
$f$
-generated implications”, Internat. J. Approx. Reason.
54 (2013) 35–46; doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2012.08.005.Google ScholarYager, R. R., “On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning”, Inform. Sci.
167 (2004) 193–216; doi:10.1016/j.ins.2003.04.001.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. and Pei, D., “On the characterizations of D-implications”, Fuzzy Syst. Math.
29 (2015) 88–98.Google Scholar
You have
Access