Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:54:10.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political history and the decipherment of Maya glyphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

T. Patrick Culbert
T. Patrick Culbert*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The remarkable progress since 1960 in the decipherment of Maya inscriptions has created unique opportunities for interpretation. The Classic period (AD 250–900) Maya, who for half a century had been interpreted almost entirely from archaeological evidence, have suddenly become an historical civilization. Archaeological data and models can now be combined with and cross-checked against the Maya’s own dynastic records. New data have accumulated so rapidly, however, that communication between specialists in different realms of Maya studies has not kept pace. To stimulate communication, the School of American Research in Santa Fe, New Mexico, sponsored a seminar in October 1986 that brought together a group of epigraphers, art historians and archaeologists to share their data, expertise and divergent approaches. This article will summarize the parts of the seminar that bear upon political history. My debt to the ten colleagues† who participated in the seminar is very great. The experience was genuinely collegial and whatever contribution our efforts make to Maya studies will be the result of the interplay of ideas and viewpoints that we established during our week together.

Type
Special section: the archaeology of Maya decipherment
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 234 , March 1988 , pp. 135 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.E.W. 1973. Maya collapse: transformation and termination in the ceramic sequence at Altar de Sacrificios, in Culbert, 1973: 133–63.Google Scholar
Adams, R.E.W. 1981. Settlement patterns of the central Yucatan and southern Campeche regions, in Ashmore, W. (ed.), Lowland Maya settlement patterns: 211–57. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Adams, R.E.W. (ed.). 1984. Rio Azul Project reports 1: Final 1983 report. San Antonio: Center for Archaeological Research, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Adams, R.E.W. (ed.). 1986. Rio Azul reports 2: The 1984 season. San Antonio: Center for Archaeological Research, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Adams, R.E.W. & Jones, R.C.. 1981. Spatial patterns and regional growth among Classic Maya cities, American Antiquity 46: 301–22.Google Scholar
Andrews, E.W., , V & Sabloff, J.A.. 1986. Classic to Postclassic: a summary discussion, in Sabloff, & Andrews, 1986: 433–56.Google Scholar
Chase, A. 1985. Troubled times: the archaeology and iconography of the Terminal Classic Southern Lowland Maya, in Fields, & Robertson, 1985, 7: 103–14.Google Scholar
Chase, A. n.d. Cycles of time: Caracol in the Maya realm. With an appendix on ‘Caracol “Altar” 21’ by Stephen, D. Houston. Paper presented at the Sixth Palenque Round Table.Google Scholar
Chase, D.Z. & Chase, A.F.. 1982. Yucatec influence in Terminal Classic northern Belize, American Antiquity 47: 596–614.Google Scholar
Closs, M.P. 1985. The dynastic history of Naranjo: the Middle Period, in Fields, & Robertson, 1985, 7:65–77.Google Scholar
Coggins, C. 1975. Painting and drawing styles at Tikal. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Coggins, C. 1979. A new order and the role of the calendar: some characteristics of the Middle Classic Period at Tikal, in Hammond, N. & Willey, G.R. (ed.), Maya archaeology and ethnohistory: 38–50. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Culbert, T.P. (ed.). 1973. The Classic Maya collapse. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Culbert, T.P. (ed.). 1986. The size of political units in the northeast Peten, Guatemala. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Culbert, T.P. (ed.). n.d. The collapse of Classic Maya civilization, in Yoffee, N. & Cowgill, G. (ed.), The collapse of ancient states and civilizations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Culbert, T.P., Kosakowsky, L.J., Fry, R.E., & Haviland, W.A.. n.d. The population of Tikal, Guatemala, in Culbert, T.P. & Rice, D.S. (ed.), Prehistoric population history of the Maya Lowlands. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. In press.Google Scholar
Fash, W.L. 1985. The evolution of the Copan polity. Paper presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Denver.Google Scholar
Fash, W.L & Stuart, D.S.. 1986. Interaction and historical process in Copan. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Fields, V.M. (vol. ed.) & Robertson, M.G. (series ed.). 1985. Fifth Palenque Round Table, 1983. San Francisco: Pre-Columbian Research Institute.Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V. 1972. The cultural evolution of civilizations, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3: 399–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J.A. 1973. Aspects of non-Classic presences in the inscriptions and sculptural art of Seibal, in Culbert, 1973: 207–19.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1972. Locational models and the site of Lubaantun: a Classic Maya centre, in Clarke, D.L. (ed.), Models in archaeology: 757–800. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1974a. The distribution of Late Classic Maya ceremonial centres in the central area, in Hammond 1974b: 313–34.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1974b. Mesoamerican archaeology: new approaches. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S.D. n.d. Caracol: El Clasico. Paper presented at the Primer Simposio Mundial de Epigrafìa Maya. Guatemala.Google Scholar
Houston, S.D. & Mathews, P.. 1985. The dynastic sequence of Dos Pilas, Guatemala. San Francisco: Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute. Monograph l.ing China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1986. Patterns of growth at Tikal. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Jones, C. n.d. The life and times of Ah Cacau, Ruler of Tikal. Paper presented at the Primer Simposio Mundial de Epigrafìa Maya. Guatemala.Google Scholar
Kowalski, J.K. 1987. The House of the Governor: a Maya palace of Uxmal, Yucatan, Mexico. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, C. E. 1986. The chronology of Chichen Itza: a review of the literature, in Sabloff, & Andrews, 1986: 141–96.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1973. Territorial organization of the Lowland Classic Maya, Science 180: 911–16.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1976. Emblem and state in the Classic Maya Lowlands. Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. 1985. Maya Early Classic monuments and inscriptions, in Willey, G.R. & Mathews, P. (ed.), A consideration of the Early Classic Period in the Maya Lowlands: 5–54. Albany: State University of New York. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies Publication 10.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. & Willey, G.R.. 1986. Prehistoric polities of the Pasion Region: hieroglyphic texts and their archaeological settings. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Morley, S.G. 1946. The ancient Maya. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1960. Historical implications of a pattern of dates at Piedras Negras, Guatemala, American Antiquity 25: 454–75.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1963. Historical data in the inscriptions of Yaxchilan, Estudios de Cultura Maya 3: 149–67.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1964. Historical data in the inscriptions of Yaxchilan, Part II, Estudios de Cultura Maya 4: 177–201.Google Scholar
Rice, D.S. 1986. The Peten Postclassic: a settlement perspective, in Sabloff, & Andrews, 1986: 301–44.Google Scholar
Robles, F.C. & Andrews, A.P.. 1986. A review and synthesis of recent Postclassic archaeology in northern Yucatan, in Sabloff, & Andrews, 1986: 53–98.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. 1973. Continuity and disruption during Terminal Late Classic times at Seibal: ceramic and other evidence, in Culbert, 1973: 107–31.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. 1975. Excavations at Seibal, Department of the Peten, Guatemala: the ceramics. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Memoirs, 13(2).Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. 1986. Interaction among Classic Maya polities: a preliminary examination, in Renfrew, C. & Cherry, J.F. (ed.), Peer polity interaction and sociopolitical change: 109–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. & Andrews, E.W. V (ed.). 1986. Late Lowland Maya civilization: Classic to Postclassic. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Schele, L. 1986a. A comparative study of the history of Katun 13 as recorded in the Maya inscriptions. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Schele, L. 1986b. An epigraphic history of the Western Maya Region. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Schele, L. & Mathews, P.. 1986. Royal visits and other intersite relationships among the Classic Maya. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Schele, L. & Miller, M.E.. 1986. The blood of kings: dynasty and ritual in Maya art. New York: George Braziller Google Scholar
Schortman, E.M. 1986. Interaction between the Maya and Non-Maya along the Late Classic southeast Maya periphery: the view from the lower Motagua Valley, Guatemala, in Urban, P.A. & Schortman, E.M. (ed.), The southeast Maya periphery: Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sharer, R.J. 1978. Archaeology and history at Quirigua, Guatemala, Journal of Field Archaeology 5: 51–70.Google Scholar
Sharer, R.J. 1986. From prehistoric to historic perspective: the meaning of our concept of Maya civilization. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Smith, A.L. 1950. Uaxactun, Guatemala: excavations of 1931–1937. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institution. Publication 588.Google Scholar
Smith, R.E. 1937. A study of Structure A-I Complex at Uaxactun. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institution. Contributions to American anthropology and history 3 (19). Publication 456.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.E.S. 1954. The rise and fall of Maya civilization. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Willey, G.R. 1974. The Classic Maya Hiatus: a ‘Rehearsal’ for the collapse?, in Hammond, 1974b: 417–30.Google Scholar
Willey, G.R. & Shimkin, D.B.. 1973. The Maya collapse: a summary view, in Culbert, 1973 : 457–501.Google Scholar
Wren, L.H. n.d. The Great Ball Court Stone. Paper presented at the Sixth Palenque Round Table, 1986.Google Scholar
Wren, L.H. & Schmidt, P.. 1986. Elite interaction during the Terminal Classic period of the northern Maya lowlands: evidence from the reliefs of the Niorth Temple of the Great Ball Court at Chichen Itza. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N. 1986. Maya elite interaction- through a glass, sideways. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar