Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T18:31:25.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art and vases vs. craft and pots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

David Gill
David Gill*
Affiliation:
Department of Classics and Ancient History, University College of Swansea, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 255 , June 1993 , pp. 452 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, M. 1991. Adopting an approach, II, in Rasmussen, T. & Spivey, N. (ed.), Looking at Greek vases: 12–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1951. The development of Attic black-figure. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 1987. Silver is white, Revue Archéologique: 279–95.Google Scholar
Von bothmer, D. (ed.) 1983. Wealth of the Ancient World, the Nelson Bunker Hunt and William Herbert Hunt Collections. Fort Worth (TX): Kimbell Art Museum.Google Scholar
Von bothmer, D. (ed.) 1987. Greek vase painting. New York (NY): The Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C. & Gill, D.W.J.. In press. Commentary on C. Morris’ ‘Hands up for the individual! The role of attribution studies in Aegean prehistory’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1990. Significant details: systems, certainties and the art-historian as detective, Antiquity 64: 950–52.Google Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. 1991. Pots and trade: spacefillers or objets d’arfí, Journal of Hellenic Studies 111: 29–47.Google Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. & Chippindale, C.. In press. Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figures, American Journal of Archaeology 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. & Vickers, M.. 1989. Pots and kettles, Revue Archéologique 297–303.Google Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. & Vickers, M.. 1990. Reflected glory: pottery and precious metal in classical Greece, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 105: 1–30.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. 1988. Why did the Greeks need imagery? An anthropological approach to the study of Greek vase painting, Hephaistos 9: 143–62.Google Scholar
Johnston, A.W. 1979. Trademarks on Greek vases. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Johnston, A.W. 1992. The vase trade: a point of order, Acta Hyperborea 3: 403–9.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. 1975. A history of Greek art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. 1985. Beazley and Attic vase painting, in Kurtz, D.C. (ed.), Beazley and Oxford: 19–30. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. 1988. The state of Attic vase-painting in the mid sixth century, in True, M. (ed.), Papers on the Amasis Painter and his world: 13–28. Malibu: J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
StÄhler, K.P. 1967. Eine unbekannte Pelike des Eucharidesmalers. Köln/Graz.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1985. Artful crafts: the influence of metal-work on Athenian painted pottery, Journal of Hellenic Studies 105:108–28.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1990. The impoverishment of the past: the case of classical Greece, Antiquity 64: 455–63.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. & Gill, D.W.J.. Forthcoming. Artful crafts: ancient Greek silverware and pottery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vltelli, K.D. 1992. Pots vs. vases, Antiquity 66: 550–53.Google Scholar