Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:35:11.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE TRACERY-CARVED, CLAMP-FRONTED MEDIEVAL CHEST AT ST MARY MAGDALEN CHURCH, OXFORD, IN A COMPARATIVE NORTH-WEST EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2014

Christopher Pickvance*
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, UK. Email: C.G.Pickvance@kent.ac.uk

Abstract

The St Mary Magdalen chest is striking because of its carved facade and has attracted the attention of historians over the last century. There has been debate about its age, culminating in the recent suggestion that it either dates to the fourteenth century or is a later copy. This paper makes a detailed study of all the elements of the chest, constructional and decorative, and compares them with features of related medieval chests in England and Continental north-western Europe. It concludes that the chest has gone through a major reconstruction involving replaced front stiles but that it shares at least four features with chests in north Germany and Sweden dating from around 1320–30 that are not found in English chests, suggesting that it is an imported chest or was made by craftsmen working in that tradition. Numerous areas for future research into the features of English and Continental medieval chests are identified.

Résumé

Le coffre de St Mary Magdalen est frappant à cause de sa façade avant sculptée et a attiré l'attention des historiens au cours du siècle dernier. Son ancienneté a fait l'objet de débats, et on a émis récemment l'hypothèse qu'il daterait du XIVe siècle ou serait une copie plus tardive. Cet article étudie tous les éléments du coffre dans les détails, que ce soit au niveau de la construction ou de la décoration, et les compare avec ceux de coffres médiévaux semblables d'Angleterre et du Nord-Ouest de l'Europe. Il conclut que le coffre a subi une reconstruction radicale qui a consisté à remplacer les montants du devant, mais qu'il partage au moins quatre caractéristiques avec les coffres du nord de l'Allemagne et de la Suède datant de vers 1320–30. Ces éléments, généralement absents des coffres anglais, indiquent que le coffre a été importé ou créé par des artisans formés à cette tradition. De nombreux domaines de recherche futurs concernant les caractéristiques des coffres médiévaux anglais et continentaux sont recensés.

Zusammenfassung

Die St Mary Magdalen Truhe ist aufgrund ihrer geschnitzten Vorderseite äußerst eindrucksvoll und sie hat die Aufmerksamkeit der Historiker über das vergangene Jahrhundert hin auf sich gezogen. Die Debatte über ihr Alter, gipfelte vor kurzem darin, dass sie entweder aus dem 14. Jahrhundert stammt oder eine spätere Kopie ist. Diese Abhandlung bringt eine ausführliche Studie sämtlicher Elemente der Truhe, sowohl konstruktiver als auch dekorativer Art, und vergleicht sie mit Merkmalen verwandter mittelalterlicher Truhen in England und dem nordwestlichen Kontinentaleuropa. Diese Untersuchung kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Truhe eine erhebliche Rekonstruktion durchgemacht hat, bei der die vorderen Stollen ersetzt wurden, dass sie jedoch mindestens vier Merkmale mit Truhen in Norddeutschland und Schweden von ca. 1320–30 gemein hat, die nicht in englischen Truhen zu finden sind, was nahelegt, dass es sich um eine importierte Truhe handelt oder das Stück von Handwerkern gefertigt wurde, die in dieser Tradition arbeiteten. Zahlreiche Bereiche für die zukünftige Forschung über die Merkmale englischer und kontinentaler mittelalterlicher Truhen werden aufgezeigt.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonde, N, Tyers, IWazny, T 1997. ‘Where does the timber come from? Dendrochronological evidence of the timber trade in northern Europe’, in A Sinclair, E Slater and J Gowlett (eds), Archaeological Sciences 1995, Oxbow, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bowett, A 2012. Woods in British Furniture-making, 1400–1900: an illustrated historical dictionary, Oblong Creative, Wetherby, in association with Kew Publishing, KewGoogle Scholar
Bridge, M CMiles, D W H 2011. ‘A review of the information gained from dendrochronologically dated chests in England’, Regional Furniture, 25, 2555Google Scholar
Cescinsky, HGribble, E R 1922. Early English Furniture and Woodwork, 2 vols, Waverley, LondonGoogle Scholar
Childs, W R 1996. ‘The English cloth export trade in the fourteenth century’, in R Britnell and J Hatcher (eds), Progress and Problems in Modern England: essays in honour of Edward Miller, 121147, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, W R 2002. ‘Timber for cloth: changing commodities in Anglo-Baltic trade in the fourteenth century’, in L Berggren, N Hybel and A Landen (eds), Cogs, Cargoes and Commerce: maritime bulk trade in northern Europe, 1150–1450, 181211, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, TorontoGoogle Scholar
Daly, A 2007. ‘Timber, trade and tree-rings: a dendrochronological analysis of structural oak timber in northern Europe, c AD 1000 to 1650’, unpublished PhD thesis, Univ Southern Denmark, <http://www.dendro.dk/index.php/publications/ph-d> (5 Feb 2014)+(5+Feb+2014)>Google Scholar
Eames, P 1977. ‘Furniture in England, France and the Netherlands from the twelfth to the fifteenth century’, Furniture History, 13, 1303Google Scholar
Fletcher, J MTapper, M C 1984. ‘Medieval artefacts and structures dated by dendrochronology’, Medieval Archaeol, 28, 112132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, F ECrossley, F H 1927. English Church Woodwork, 2nd edn, Batsford, LondonGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P M 2001. Church Chests of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries in England, reprint of 1907 edn, Caber Press, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
Lewer, H WWall, J C 1913. The Church Chests of Essex, Talbot, LondonGoogle Scholar
Macquoid, PEdwards, R 1983. Dictionary of English Furniture, 3 vols, Antique Collectors’ Club, WoodbridgeGoogle Scholar
Mercer, E 1969. Furniture 700–1700, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
Miles, D W HBridge, M C 2008. Westminster Abbey, London: tree-ring dating of the chests and fittings, Engl Heritage Res Dept Ser 3/2008, PortsmouthGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A 2001. St Mary Magdalen Oxford: a thousand years of church and parish, St Mary Magdalen Church, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pickvance, C G 2007. ‘Medieval tracery-carved clamp-fronted chests: the “Kentish Gothic” chests of Rainham, Faversham and Canterbury in comparative perspective’, Regional Furniture, 21, 6794Google Scholar
Pickvance, C G 2011. ‘The St Ebbe's chests’, Regional Furniture Soc Newsl, 55, 17Google Scholar
Pickvance, C G 2012. ‘Medieval domed chests in Kent: a contribution to a national and international study’, Regional Furniture, 26, 105147Google Scholar
RCHME 1939. City of Oxford, Roy Comm Hist Monuments Engl Inventories, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
Roe, F 1902. Ancient Coffers and Cupboards, Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
Sherlock, D 2008. Suffolk Church Chests, Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and History, IpswichGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G 2008. ‘The pine standard chest in St Margaret's Church, King's Lynn, and the social and economic significance of the type’, in J McNeill (ed), King's Lynn and the Fens: medieval art, architecture and archaeology, Brit Archaeol Ass Conference Trans xxxi, 53–65, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Steane, J M 2001. The Archaeology of Power, Tempus, StroudGoogle Scholar
Stülpnagel, K H von 2000. Die Gothische Truhen der Lüneberger Heidekloster, Museumsdorf Cloppenburg, CloppenburgGoogle Scholar
Tracy, C 2001. Continental Church Furniture in England: a traffic in piety, Antique Collectors’ Club, WoodbridgeGoogle Scholar