Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:27:37.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations on the Sites of the Amphitheatre and Forum-Basilica at Silchester, Hampshire: an Interim Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Michael Fulford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A research excavation was commenced on the site of the basilica which forms the western side of the forum of Calleva Atrebatum (Silchester, Hants) in IQ80. Its aim is to examine the Late Iron Age and early Roman occupation which, despite extensive Victorian excavations, was preserved beneath the masonry basilica. So far there is evidence of the Iron Age sequence dating back to the last quarter of the first century B.C.; it ends with the construction of a palisade dating to about the time of the Roman conquest. Two major phases of Roman timber building have been recorded, of which the later consists of a large basilica, interpreted as part of a forum-basilica and of Flavian date. The masonry basilica dates to the early second century. From the mid third until the later fourth century the basilica was given over to metalworking. The amphitheatre, with its well-preserved earthen seating banks, was first constructed during the third quarter of the first century A.D., when the seating, arena wall and entrance passages were built of timber. After several phases of repair the arena wall and entrance passages were rebuilt in stone in the first half of the third century. The full plan of this phase has been recovered; it consists of two opposing entrances on the long axis and two apsidal recesses on the short axis. The monument enjoyed a brief period of reuse in the twelfth and early thirteenth centuries.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 39 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Summary reports have appeared in Britannia, ix (1978), 464–5Google Scholar; ibid., xi (1980), 394; Ibid., xii (1981), 362; Ibid., xiii (1982), 389–91; Ibid., xiv (1983), 330–1; Hughes, M. (ed.), Archaeology in Hampshire: Annual Report for 1979 (1980), 12–15Google Scholar; ibid, for 1980 (1981), 13–18; ibid.for 1981 (1982), 12–17; ibid., for 1982 (1983), 22–9.

2 Joyce, J. G., ‘Third account of excavations at Silchester’, Archaeologia, xlvi, pt. 2 (1881), 349–65.Google Scholar

3 Fox, G. E. and Hope, W. H. St John, ‘Excavations on the site of the Roman city at Silchester, Hants, in 1892’, Archaeologia, liii, pt. 2 (1893), 539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 On behalf of the Department of the Environment to assess plough damage.

5 Boon, G. C., ‘Belgic and Roman Silchester: the excavations of 1954–8 with an excursus on the early history of Calleva’, Archaeologia, cii (1969), 21–36.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 1–15.

7 Cotton, M. A., ‘Excavations at Silchester 1938–9’, Archaeologia, xcii (1947), 121–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Fulford, M., Silchester Defences: Excavations on the Defences 1924–80, Britannia Monograph, 5 (London, 1984).Google Scholar

9 Hawkes, C. F. C. and Hull, M. R., Camulodunum: First Report on the Excavations 1930–39, Soc. Antiq. London Res. Rep. 14 (1947).Google Scholar

10 M., R. E. and Wheeler, T. V., Verulamium: a Belgic and Two Roman Cities, Soc. Antiq. London Res. Rep. 11 (1936).Google Scholar

11 Clifford, E. M., Bagendon: a Belgic Oppidum. A Record of the Excavations of 1954–56 (Cambridge, 1961).Google Scholar

12 Joyce, , op. cit. (note 2), 352–3Google Scholar; Fox, and Hope, St John, op. cit. (note 3), 544Google Scholar.

13 Joyce, , op. cit. (note 2), 358, 359–61Google Scholar; Journal, entries for 21st June and 27th October 1870.

14 Joyce, , op. cit. (note 2), 364.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 360–1; Fox, and Hope, St John, op. cit. (note 3), 549, 554.Google Scholar

16 Joyce, , op. cit. (note 2), 364.Google Scholar

17 Op. cit. (note 3).

18 Op. cit. (note 2), 360–1.

19 Op. cit. (note 3), 551.

20 Ibid., 554.

21 Ibid., 557–8; Boon, G. C., Silchester: the Roman Town of Calleva (London, 1974), 119, fig. 34,gGoogle Scholar; Richmond, I. A., Antiq. J. xxiv (1944), 7–9Google Scholar; for a similar cruciform trench, in the Exeter forum, see Bidwell, P. T., The Legionary Bath-House and Basilica and Forum at Exeter (Exeter, 1979), 88, fig. 19Google Scholar; and in the orchestra of the Verulamium theatre, Kenyon, K. M., ‘The Roman theatre at Verulamium, St Albans’, Archaeologia, lxxxiv (1935), 281, pis. LX and LXVIIIGoogle Scholar.

22 Op. cit. (note 2), 359.

23 Ibid., 361.

24 Ibid., 359.

25 Frere, S. S., Verulamium Excavations, 1, Soc. Antiq. London Res. Rep. 28 (1972), 304–18.Google Scholar

26 Kähler, H., Die römischen Kapitelle des Rheingebietes, Romisch-Germanische Forschungen, 13 (1939), 32.Google Scholar

27 Blagg, T. and Read, S., ‘The Roman pewter-moulds from Silchester‘, Antiq. J. lvii (1977), 270–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Op. cit. (note 2), 363.

29 I am grateful to Mr J. A. Davies for collecting the information on coin finds from Joyce's Journal in order to make comparison with the finds of the current excavation.

30 Casey, P. J., Roman Coinage in Britain (1980), 31, fig. 5Google Scholar; Reece, R., ‘A short survey of the Roman coins found on fourteen sites in Britain’, Britannia, iii (1972), 269–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Frere, S. S., Verulamium Excavations, 11, Soc. Antiq. London Res. Rep. 41 (1983), 193–5, figs. 77, 89.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., 3.

33 Bievelet, H., ‘Exploration archeologique de Bavai: four de verrier, ornements muraux et moules a flans monetaires’, Revue du Nord, xlix (1967), 623–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frere, , op. cit. (note 31), 30–2Google Scholar.

34 Allen, D., ‘The Belgic dynasties of Britain and their coins’, Archaeologia, xc (1944), 26–7Google Scholar; Boon, , op. cit. (note 21), 42.Google Scholar

35 Op. cit. (note 5), 14.

36 Crummy, P., ‘The origins of some major Romano-British towns’, Britannia, xiii (1982), 130–3.Google Scholar

37 Hope, W. H. St John and Fox, G. E., ‘Excavations on the site of the Roman city at Silchester, Hants, in 1903 and 1904’, Archaeologia, lix, pt. 2 (1905), 366Google Scholar. A reason for such an extraordinary act is suggested by Boon, , op. cit. (note 21), 95Google Scholar.

38 Compare, for example, Barrett, A. A., ‘The career of Cogidubnus’, Britannia, x (1979), 241Google Scholar, with J. E. Bogaers, ‘King Cogidubnus in Chichester: another reading of RIB 91’, ibid., 254.

39 cf. Boon, , op. cit. (note 21), 55.Google Scholar

40 Archaeologia, lix, pt. 2 (1905), 366.Google Scholar

41 Greenaway, J., ‘The Neronian stamped tile from Little London, near Silchester’, Britannia, xii (1981), 290–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Frere, S. S., Britannia: a History of Roman Britain (London, 1967), 204.Google Scholar

43 Philp, B. J., ‘The forum of Roman London, 1968–9’, Britannia, viii (1977), 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 Merrifield, R., London: City of Romans (London, 1983), 63–5.Google Scholar

45 Frere, , op. cit. (note 31), 55–72.Google Scholar

46 Wacher, J. S., The Towns of Roman Britain (London, 1975), 280–2, 294–8Google Scholar; Biddle, M. and Quirk, R. N., ‘Excavations near Winchester Cathedral, 1961’, Arch. J. cxix (1962), 153Google Scholar.

47 Agricola, 21.1.

48 Bidwell, , op. cit. (note 21), 86–8.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., 73, fig. 20; id., Roman Exeter: Fortress and Town (Exeter, 1980), 49.

50 R.I.B., 288.

51 Frere, S. S., ‘The forum and baths at Caistor by Norwich’, Britannia, ii (1971), 9.Google Scholar

52 Hebditch, M. and Mellor, J., ‘The forum and basilica of Roman Leicester’, Britannia, iv (1973), 40–1.Google Scholar

53 Kähler, , op. cit. (note 26)Google Scholar; Blagg, T. F. C., ‘Schools of stonemasons in Roman Britain’, in Munby, J., Henig, M. (eds.), Roman Life and Art in Britain, I, B.A.R. 41 (Oxford, 1977). 64–7Google Scholar.

54 Wacher, , op. at. (note 46), 230, 336–8.Google Scholar

55 Walthew, C. V., ‘Early Roman town development in Gallia Belgica: a review of some problems’, Oxford J. Arch, I, pt. 2 (1982), 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 The most recent advocate of the military origin of the ‘principia’ plan is Rivet, A. L. F., in La citta antica come fatto di cultura. Atti del Convegno di Como e Bellagio, 1979 (1983), 37–8Google Scholar, thus supporting the original proponent of the theory, Atkinson, D., in his Report on Excavations at Wroxeter, 1923–1927 (Oxford, 1942), 345–62Google Scholar.

57 Boon, , op. cit. (note 21), 112–15.Google Scholar

58 J. S. Wacher, for example, assigns, with little evidence to go on, the last major extension of the civilian area of the British province to Hadrian with the creation of the civitates centred on Caerwent, Carmarthen, Brough and Aldborough: op. cit. (note 46), 375–404.

59 De architectura, v.i.4.

60 Ibid., v.i.2,4.

61 Stukeley, W., Itinerarium Curiosum. Or, an Account of the Antiquities and remarkable Curiosities in Nature or Art, observed in travels through Great Britain, 1, 2nd edn. (London, 1776), 178Google Scholar, and vol. II, pi. XLIII.

62 As it was in Stukeley's time, ibid., 178 n. 7.

63 Ibid., I, 166, pls. LI-LIII.

64 Bradley, R., ‘Maumbury Rings, Dorchester: the excavations of 1908–1913’, Archaeologia, cv (1976), 43–8.Google Scholar

65 Lyne, M. A. B. and Jefferies, R. S., The Alice HoltlFarnham Roman Pottery Industry C.B.A. Res. Rep. 30 (London, 1979), Class5.Google Scholar

66 Thompson, F. H., ‘The excavation of the Roman amphitheatre at Chester’, Archaeologia, cv (1976), 151–2Google Scholar; Wheeler, R. E. M., ‘The Roman amphitheatre at Caerleon, Monmouth-shire’, Archaeologia, lxxviii (1928), pls. xx, XXII, IGoogle Scholar.

67 Stukeley, , op. cit. (note 61), 170.Google Scholar

68 Bradley, , op. cit. (note 64), 73–9.Google Scholar

69 Ibid., 59. fig. 18.

70 Little, J. H., ‘The Carmarthen amphitheatre’, Carmarthen Antiquary, vii (1971), 59–60, fig. 2Google Scholar; Brown, P. D. C. and McWhirr, A. D., ‘Cirencester 1966’, Antiq. J. xlvii (1967), 185–8, fig. 2, pls. XXXI-XXXIICrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Boon, G. C., Isca: the Roman Legionary Fortress at Caerleon, Mon., 3rd edn. (Cardiff, 1972), 93–6.Google Scholar

72 Bradley, , op. cit. (note 64), 75Google Scholar; White, G. M., ‘The Chichester amphitheatre: preliminary excavations’, Antiq. J. xvi (1936), 149–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Wacher, J. S., ‘Cirencester 1963; fourth interim report’, Antiq. J. xliv (1964), 18.Google Scholar

74 Thompson, , op. cit. (note 66), 163–4, 182.Google Scholar

75 Potter, K. R. (ed.), Gesta Stephani, with an introduction and notes by Davis, R. H. C. (Oxford, 1976), 208–10.Google Scholar

76 King, D. J. C. and Renn, D. F., ‘Lidelea Castle—a suggested identification’, Antiq. J. li (1971), 301–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

77 Op. cit. (note 61), 178.

78 Wacher, , op. cit. (note 73), 18, pl. xxGoogle Scholar; Wacher, J. S., ‘Cirencester 1962: third interim report’, Antiq. J. xliii (1963), 26Google Scholar.