Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T04:39:09.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in intensive care unit before (2007–2010) and after (2011–2014) the beginning of an antimicrobial stewardship program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2024

Alessio Strazzulla*
Affiliation:
Internal and General Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Vladimir Adrien
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France
Segla Robert Houngnandan
Affiliation:
Internal and General Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Sandra Devatine
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Ouerdia Bahmed
Affiliation:
Internal and General Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Sarra Abroug
Affiliation:
Internal and General Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Sarra Hamrouni
Affiliation:
Internal and General Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Mehran Monchi
Affiliation:
Intensive Care Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
Sylvain Diamantis
Affiliation:
Internal and General Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France Infectious Diseases Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France EA 7380 Dynamic, Université Paris Est Créteil, EnvA, USC ANSES, Créteil, France
*
Corresponding author: Alessio Strazzulla; Email: alessio.strazzulla@ghsif.fr

Abstract

Objectives:

To investigate the factors associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in intensive care unit (ICU) before and after an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Materials:

Monocentric retrospective cohort study. Patients admitted to the ICU in 2007–2014 were included. Characteristics of P. aeruginosa patients were compared to overall ICU population. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of P. aeruginosa patients before (2007–2010) and after (2011–2014) the beginning of the AMP were compared.

Results:

Overall, 5,263 patients were admitted to the ICU, 274/5,263 (5%) had a P. aeruginosa isolate during their staying. In 2011–2014, the percentage P. aeruginosa isolates reduced (7% vs 4%, P ≤ .0001). Patients with P. aeruginosa had higher rates of in-hospital death (43% vs 20%, P < .0001) than overall ICU population. In 2011–2014, rates of multidrug-resistant (11% vs 2%, P = .0020), fluoroquinolone-resistant (35% vs 12%, P < .0001), and ceftazidime-resistant (23% vs 8%, P = .0009) P. aeruginosa reduced. Treatments by fluoroquinolones (36% vs 4%, P ≤ .0001), carbapenems (27% vs 9%, P = .0002), and third-generation cephalosporins (49% vs 12%, P ≤ .0001) before P. aeruginosa isolation reduced while piperacillin (0% vs 13%, P < .0001) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (8% vs 26%, P = .0023) increased. Endotracheal intubation reduced in 2011–2014 (61% vs 35%, P < .0001). Fluoroquinolone-resistance was higher in patients who received endotracheal intubation (29% vs 17%, P = .0197). Previous treatment by fluoroquinolones (OR = 2.94, P = .0020) and study period (2007–2010) (OR = 2.07, P = .0462) were the factors associated with fluoroquinolone-resistance at the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

Antibiotic susceptibility in P. aeruginosa isolates was restored after the reduction of endotracheal intubation, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and third-generation cephalosporins and the increased use of molecules with a low ecological footprint, as piperacillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be responsible of life-threatening diseases, as a consequence of urinary, bone, respiratory, abdominal, and disseminated infections. Reference Pop-Vicas and Opal1 It colonizes human body, being part of the human microbiota (especially in the respiratory tract), and it can also be acquired from exogenous sources. Reference Bertrand, Thouverez and Talon2 Patients hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk of contamination. Potential exogenous sources are tap-water and fomites while patient-to-patient transmission is possible but it can be limited by standard precautions. Reference Rogues, Boulestreau and Lasheras3 Antibiotic pressure is the most relevant factor for P. aeruginosa acquisition in ICU. Reference Boyer, Doussau and Thiébault4

At each antibiotic treatment, germs of the human microbiota are exposed to sub-lethal levels of antibiotics. This event enhances the selection of antibiotic resistance genes, which often are host in transferable plasmids. Reference Gullberg, Albrecht, Karlsson, Sandegren and Andersson5 Otherwise, the antibiotic pressure can trigger chromosomal mutations and transfer of resistance determinants, as is typical for P. aeruginosa. Reference Oliver, Mulet, López-Causapé and Juan6 Because of the risk of antibiotic resistance, the use of broad-spectrum molecules is currently discouraged as antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment. Reference Ioannou, Karakonstantis and Schouten7 The benefits in terms of antimicrobial susceptibility resulting from the reduced consumption of broad-spectrum molecules in ICU was largely demonstrated for gram-negative bacilli. Reference Onorato, Macera and Calò8 However, the results of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in ICU concerning P. aeruginosa are often deceiving with no significant reduction of antimicrobial resistance rates. Reference Abbara, Domenech de Cellès and Batista9Reference Slain, Sarwari and Petros11

At the end of 2010, an ASP started at the ICU of the Melun General Hospital, a 350-bed tertiary care hospital in the Ile-de-France region in France, its ICU accounting for a total of 24 beds. The main objective of the ASP was to restrain the consumption of broad-spectrum molecules (carbapenems, fluoroquinolones (FLQ), and third-generation cephalosporins (3-GC)). This objective was fully achieved. Indeed, a reduction of 50%–85% in the consumption of carbapenems, FLQ, and 3-GC was observed in the following 4-year period (from 2011 to 2014) when compared to the previous one (from 2007 to 2010). Contemporarily, a reduction of AmpC hyperproducing group 3 Enterobacteriaceae, FLQ resistant, and ceftazidime resistant P. aeruginosa was observed. Reference Abbara, Pitsch and Jochmans12

This study pursues the previous one through a P. aeruginosa targeted analysis. It investigates the factors associated with isolation of P. aeruginosa from ICU patients before and after the beginning of the ASP, with a special focus on the risk of antibiotic-resistance and the benefits produced by the ASP in terms of antibiotic susceptibility recovering.

Materials and methods

A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted at Melun General Hospital, a 350 tertiary bed hospital in Melun (France). Patients were hospitalized in ICU, accounting for 24 beds. All adult patients admitted to the ICU presenting P. aeruginosa isolates during their hospitalization in ICU from January the 1st, 2007 to December 31st, 2014 were included. Two timeframes were analyzed: (1) before the beginning of the ASP (2007–2010); (2) after the beginning of the ASP (2011–2014).

The previous study by Abbara et al already evaluated the susceptibility of all P. aeruginosa isolated from any site in patients hospitalized in ICU during the same study period. It focused on resistance to single molecules and did not explored the factors associated with P. aeruginosa isolation. Reference Abbara, Pitsch and Jochmans12 For this study, we revised all ICU patient’s files and selected patients with P. aeruginosa isolation from any site during ICU stay and up to 7 days after ICU discharge to explore the possible late impact of ICU stay on P. aeruginosa selection. We included all P. aeruginosa isolates, both infections and colonizations, while in the previous study only isolates of clinical significance were included. We also added analysis about multidrug resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. The characteristics of patients with P. aeruginosa isolation were compared to ICU population and an analysis before/after intervention was performed.

The study was conducted in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and national and institutional standards. Reference Deplanque, Sénéchal-Cohen and Lemaire13

Data were obtained through the revision of patients’ files which were collected in software used in daily clinical practice (Sillage v17 and CGM Lab channel 1.20.33686). Microbiological identifications and susceptibility tests were performed according to recommendations of the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 14 The following outcomes were considered: (1) acquisition MDR bacteria; (2) length of ICU stay; (3) length of hospital stay; (4) in-ICU death; and (5) in-hospital death.

Fisher’s exact test (qualitative variables) and Student’s t-test (quantitative variables) were applied for the univariate analysis. At first, characteristics of P. aeruginosa patients were compared to overall ICU population. Then, clinical and microbiological characteristics of P. aeruginosa patients before (2007–2010) and after (2011–2014) the beginning of the AMP were compared. Analysis according to the origin of the infection (community acquired vs hospital acquired) was also performed. Logistic regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis of risk factors of FLQ resistance the parameters included in the analysis were chosen according to univariate analysis results (P ≤ .0001). For the analysis of the risk of MDR P. aeruginosa only the exposition to any class of antibiotics was considered. Statistical significance was set at P < .050.

Results

Overall, 5,263 patients were admitted to the ICU during the study period (2007–2014), 274/5263 (5%) having at least a P. aeruginosa isolate during hospitalization in ICU and up to 7 days after ICU discharge. The percentage of patients with P. aeruginosa isolates reduced significantly before and after the ASP (7% in 2007–2010 vs 4% in 2011–2014, P ≤ .0001). Patients with P. aeruginosa had longer hospital stays and higher rates of in-hospital and in-ICU death (P < .0001) than overall ICU population. They received endotracheal intubation more frequently than patients without P. aeruginosa isolates (P < .0001). Table 1 resumes characteristics of the study population.

Table 1. Characteristics of the population

Note. CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; MV, mechanical ventilation; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; RR, related ratio; SAPS-II, simplified acute physiology score-II; SD, standard deviation.

In 2011–2014, rates of multidrug-resistant, fluoroquinolone-resistant, and ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa reduced significantly (P = .0020, P < .0001 and P = .0009, respectively). Rates of antibiotic treatments by FLQ, carbapenems, and 3-GC before P. aeruginosa isolation reduced significantly in 2011–2014 (P ≤ .0002). Simultaneously, use of piperacillin (without tazobactam) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) increased (P < .0001 and P = .0023, respectively). P. aeruginosa patients received endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation less frequently in 2011–2014 than 2007–2010. Also, the length of hospital and ICU stay decreased during the same period (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.08, respectively). Table 2 shows characteristics of the population with P. aeruginosa isolates.

Table 2. Characteristics of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Note. *including: linezolid, fosfomycin, daptomycin, rifampicin; **including: purulent lesions, cutaneous biopsies, vascular catheter, bone biopsies, coprocultures and peritoneal fluids; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; MDR, multidrug resistant; MV, mechanical ventilation; NA, not applicable; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; RR, related ratio; SAPS-II, simplified acute physiology score-II; SD, standard deviation; VAP, ventilator associated pneumonia.

Patients with hospital acquired P. aeruginosa had higher rates of endotracheal intubation (P < .0001), central venous catheter (P = .0316), and previous FLQ treatment (P = .0059) than patients with community acquired P. aeruginosa. Sepsis was more frequent (P = .0063) among patient with community acquired P. aeruginosa than patients with hospital acquired P. aeruginosa (Table 3).

Table 3. Characteristics of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Note. *including linezolid, fosfomycin, daptomycin, rifampicin; **including purulent lesions, cutaneous biopsies, vascular catheter, bone biopsies, coprocultures and peritoneal fluids; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; MDR, multidrug resistant; MV, mechanical ventilation; NA, not applicable; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; RR, related ratio; SAPS-II, simplified acute physiology score-II; SD, standard deviation; VAP, ventilator associated pneumonia.

The univariate analysis showed that patients who received endotracheal intubation had higher rates of fluoroquinolone resistant P. aeruginosa isolation (P = .0197; Table 4). At the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with fluoroquinolone-resistance were study period (2007–2010) and previous treatment by fluoroquinolones (P = 0.0020 and P = 0.0462, respectively), as shown in Table 5. No previous use of any class of antibiotics was associated with the risk of MDR P. aeruginosa (Table 6).

Table 4. Resistance to fluoroquinolones among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients receiving endotracheal intubation

Table 5. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Table 6. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with presence of multi drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Note. NA, not applicable.

Discussion

This study showed that the frequency of P. aeruginosa infection in ICU reduced after the beginning of an ASP, principally based on saving of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The antimicrobial susceptibility of P. aeruginosa recovered after the reduction of 3-GC and fluoroquinolone consumption and the increased prescription of alternative “old” molecules, such as piperacillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Endotracheal intubation was associated with FLQ resistance.

Although ASP are strongly recommended, reducing antibiotic consumption in ICU is extremely difficult because patients’ uncertain diagnosis and compromised hemodynamic state push prescribers keeping long-course broad-spectrum antibiotic treatments. A consequence of this attitude is an increased risk of P. aeruginosa infection which occurs almost exclusively in patients who received a previous antibiotic treatment. Reference Pickens and Wunderink15 In fact, broad-spectrum antibiotics interact with the environment and facilitate P. aeruginosa acquisition. Reference Boyer, Doussau and Thiébault4 Our ASP succeeded in reducing both P. aeruginosa antibiotic resistance and infection incidence. One of the key of this success was the increased use of molecules with low ecological footprint to treat infections others than P. aeruginosa.

The use of FLQ as empirical treatment for P. aeruginosa is inadvisable because of the risk of treatment failure and the increased mortality due to the development of antibiotic resistance. Reference Nguyen, Hsu, Ganapathy, Shriner and Wong-Beringer16 Indeed, P. aeruginosa has many mechanisms of resistance, frequently based on GyrA, ParC, and MexR enzymes. Reference Nguyen, Nguyen, Nguyen and Le17 In ICU setting, an important virulence and resistance factor is biofilm which contributes reducing susceptibility to antimicrobial molecules and host-immune factors. Reference Das, Sehar and Manefield18 This effect disappears when bacteria are deprived of the capacity of producing the extracellular matrix made by polysaccharides, proteins, and metabolites. Reference Walters, Frank, Amandine, Franklin and Stewart19 As a consequence, biofilm reduces antibiotic efficacy by several mechanisms: reduction of antibiotic penetration, microenvironment modifications, and increased inflammatory response. Reference Pang, Raudonis, Glick, Lin and Cheng20 FLQ activity is largely limited by biofilm production. Reference Cepas, López and Muñoz21 In ICU, the main sources of biofilm producing P. aeruginosa are invasive devices. Reference Boyer, Doussau and Thiébault4 Moreover, endotracheal intubation is the most relevant determinant of P. aeruginosa acquisition and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Reference Coppadoro, Bellani and Foti22 The restriction of endotracheal intubation was adopted in our ICU to reduce respiratory infection rate. It was obtained through new standard of care, such as protocol-based sedation, favoring noninvasive ventilation over invasive ventilation whenever possible, and improved ventilation weaning process in mechanical ventilation. No change in devices and patient admission policy was adopted during the study period. Results of this study are in line with other studies which showed that restriction of endotracheal intubation was associated with reduction of mortality and MDR bacterial infection. Reference Villemure-Poliquin, Costerousse and Lessard Bonaventure23,Reference Wang, Li and Dai24 This study showed that previous FLQ treatment was associated with FLQ resistance in P. aeruginosa strains afterward isolated. It also showed that patients who received endotracheal intubation had higher rates of FLQ resistance. We can hypothesize that the reduction of endotracheal intubation observed from 2011 to 2014 could have contributed in reducing rates of FLQ resistant P. aeruginosa. This study advocates against the use of FLQ in intubated patients because of the increased risk of FLQ resistance in P. aeruginosa strains.

FLQ are frequently prescribed for atypical pneumonia and intracellular bacterial infections but their collateral damages in term of selection of MDR bacterial impose their limitation as empirical antibiotic treatment. For this reason, our ASP suggested macrolides as alternative molecules. Reference Abbara, Pitsch and Jochmans12 Indeed, macrolides can be preferred to FLQ in many situations. At first, macrolides are not inferior to FLQ for the treatment of Legionella pneumonia. Reference Jasper, Musuuza and Tischendorf25 Second, the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia with beta-lactam plus macrolides resulted more effective than treatment with FLQ alone in reducing mortality and length of hospitalization in ICU. Reference Ito, Ishida and Tachibana26 Third, because of their immunomodulatory effects, macrolides are an interesting alternative for the treatment of low respiratory tract infections in patients affected by chronic respiratory diseases. Reference Pollock and Chalmers27 In this study, macrolides contributed to reduce FLQ prescriptions.

Piperacillin is a broad-spectrum beta-lactam. It is active against gram-positive bacteria and it shows high activity against gram-negative bacilli, both aerobic and anaerobic (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and P. aeruginosa). Reference Drusano, Schimpff and Hewitt28 It is hydrolyzed by beta-lactamases (as TEM-1) and, therefore, it is almost always administrated in association with tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor which successfully restores the activity of piperacillin against many beta-lactamases. Reference Bryson and Brogden29 However, P. aeruginosa may rapidly develop resistance to tazobactam by the production of extended spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpC beta-lactamases. Reference Karaiskos and Giamarellou30 The use of piperacillin “alone” without the adding of tazobactam for documented infection caused by gram-negative bacteria was adopted in our ICU with the rationale of sparing tazobactam and, therefore, reducing the antimicrobial selective pressure on targeted pathogens, bacteria of the human microbiota and invasive device’s contaminants. Results of this study suggest that this strategy could have contributed in reducing rates of MDR and ceftazidime resistant P. aeruginosa strains. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

TMP-SMX represents an alternative to FLQ and beta-lactams for the treatment of infection by gram-negative (Enterobacteriaceae) and gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria, although it is not active against P. aeruginosa. In France, it is currently the first choice for treatment of documented urinary infection according to French national recommendations. 31 In our establishment, TMP-SFX is successfully used for the treatment of VAP by bacteria other than P. aeruginosa. Reference Strazzulla, Postorino and Youbong32 According to our ASP, TMP-SMX was preferred to FLQ and beta-lactams whenever the antimicrobial susceptibility test confirmed the sensibility to TMP-SMX. Aim of this choice was to reduce antibiotic “collateral damages” and in particular the selection of MDR bacteria. The reduction of P. aeruginosa’s resistance rates to FLQ and beta-lactams was likely influenced by the reduced consumption of broad-spectrum molecules (FLQ and 3-GC) and their replacement by molecules with a lower ecological footprint, such as TMP-SMX and piperacillin.

Results of this study were limited by its retrospective design. Indeed, a loss of data was expected and direct comparison between molecules were not possible. Also, a longer period analysis was necessary to confirm the positive results of the ASP. Because of the study design, the number of variables was limited and many factors potentially associated with P. aeruginosa isolation were not investigated. Notwithstanding, results of this study are encouraging and justify the pursue of exploration by further studies. In particular, factors associated with P. aeruginosa isolates occurring in patients hospitalized in non-ICU units needs to be explored. Also, risk factors of P. aeruginosa VAP need to be investigated. A direct comparison between different molecules necessitates to be performed.

Conclusions

The antibiotic stewardship program implemented in our institution achieved in reducing rates of antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from ICU patients. Among the factors investigated by this study, the decreasing consumption of 3-GC and FLQ and the increased use of TMP-SMX and piperacillin contributed in achieving this result. Also, the decreasing use of endotracheal intubation was observed and likely participate in reducing rates of P. aeruginosa isolation. Further studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of this strategy in other settings.

Acknowledgments

None.

Author contribution

AS drafted the work; VA gave substantial contribution in data acquisition, RH revised the draft, SD contributed in interpretation of data; OB contributed in interpretation of data; SA contributed in interpretation of data; SH contributed in interpretation of data; MM gave substantial contributions to conception or design of the work; SD gave.

Financial support

This study did not receive any funding from public or private entities.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

Pop-Vicas, A, Opal, SM. The clinical impact of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli in the management of septic shock. Virulence 2014;5:206–12. doi: 10.4161/viru.26210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertrand, X, Thouverez, M, Talon, D, et al. Endemicity, molecular diversity and colonisation routes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units. Intens Care Med 2001;27:1263–8. doi: 10.1007/s001340100979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogues, AM, Boulestreau, H, Lasheras, A, et al. Contribution of tap water to patient colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a medical intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:7278. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, A, Doussau, A, Thiébault, R, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition on an intensive care unit: relationship between antibiotic selective pressure and patients’ environment. Crit Care 2011;15:R55. doi: 10.1186/cc10026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, E, Albrecht, LM, Karlsson, C, Sandegren, L, Andersson, DI. Selection of a multidrug resistance plasmid by sublethal levels of antibiotics and heavy metals. mBio 2014;5:e0191814. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01918-14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, A, Mulet, X, López-Causapé, C, Juan, C. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist Updat 2015;21–22:4159. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannou, P, Karakonstantis, S, Schouten, J, et al. Indications for medical antibiotic prophylaxis and potential targets for antimicrobial stewardship intervention: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28:362370. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onorato, L, Macera, M, Calò, F, et al. The effect of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in two intensive care units of a teaching hospital: an interrupted time series analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:782.e1782.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.10.021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abbara, S, Domenech de Cellès, M, Batista, R, et al. Variable impact of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in three intensive care units: time-series analysis of 2012-2017 surveillance data. J Hosp Infect 2020;104:150157. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.10.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taggart, LR, Leung, E, Muller, MP, Matukas, LM, Daneman, N. Differential outcome of an antimicrobial stewardship audit and feedback program in two intensive care units: a controlled interrupted time series study. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:480. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1223-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slain, D, Sarwari, AR, Petros, KO, et al. Impact of a multimodal antimicrobial stewardship program on Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility and antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit setting. Crit Care Res Pract 2011;2011:416426. doi: 10.1155/2011/416426.Google ScholarPubMed
Abbara, S, Pitsch, A, Jochmans, S, et al. Impact of a multimodal strategy combining a new standard of care and restriction of carbapenems, fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins on antibiotic consumption and resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a French intensive care unit. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2019;53:416422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deplanque, D., Sénéchal-Cohen, S., Lemaire, F. French Jarde’s law and European regulation on drug trials: harmonization and implementation of new rules. Thérapie 2017;72:7380. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.12.006.Google ScholarPubMed
European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing: Guidelines for detection of resistance mechanisms and specific resistances of clinical and/or epidemiological importance; Version 2.0 July 2017. https://www.eucast.org/resistance_mechanisms. Published 2017. Accessed March 15, 2023.Google Scholar
Pickens, CI, Wunderink, RG. Principles and Practice of Antibiotic Stewardship in the ICU. Chest 2019;156:163171. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, LH, Hsu, DI, Ganapathy, V, Shriner, K, Wong-Beringer, A. Reducing empirical use of fluoroquinolones for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections improves outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:714–20. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, KV, Nguyen, TV, Nguyen, HTT, Le, DV. Mutations in the gyrA, parC, and mexR genes provide functional insights into the fluoroquinolone resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in Vietnam. Infect Drug Resist 2018;11:275282. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S147581 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Das, T, Sehar, S, Manefield, M. The roles of extracellular DNA in the structural integrity of extracellular polymeric substance and bacterial biofilm development. Environ Microbiol Rep 2013;5:778–86. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, MC, Frank, R, Amandine, B, Franklin, MJ, Stewart, PS. Contributions of antibiotic penetration, oxygen limitation, and low metabolic activity to tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:317–23. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.317-323.2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, Z, Raudonis, R, Glick, BR, Lin, TJ, Cheng, Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv 2019;37:177192. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cepas, V, López, Y, Muñoz, E, et al. Relationship between biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Microb Drug Resist 2019;25:7279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppadoro, A, Bellani, G, Foti, G. Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: a literature review. Respir Care 2019;64:15861595. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villemure-Poliquin, N, Costerousse, O, Lessard Bonaventure, P, et al. Tracheostomy versus prolonged intubation in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2023;70:15161526. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02539-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S, Li, J, Dai, J, et al. Establishment and validation of models for the risk of multi-drug resistant bacteria infection and prognosis in elderly patients with pulmonary infection: a multicenter retrospective study. Infect Drug Resist 2023;16:65496566. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S422564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasper, AS, Musuuza, JS, Tischendorf, JS, et al. Are fluoroquinolones or macrolides better for treating legionella pneumonia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:19791989. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, A, Ishida, T, Tachibana, H, et al. Usefulness of β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy for treating community-acquired pneumonia patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: Propensity score analysis of a prospective cohort study. J Infect Chemother 2021;27:14471453. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.06.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, J, Chalmers, JD. The immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics in respiratory disease. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2021;71:102095. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drusano, GL, Schimpff, SC, Hewitt, WL. The acylampicillins: mezlocillin, piperacillin, and azlocillin. Rev Infect Dis 1984;6:1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryson, HM, Brogden, RN. Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential. Drugs 1994;47:506–35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199447030-00008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karaiskos, I, Giamarellou, H. Carbapenem-sparing strategies for ESBL producers: when and how. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020;9:61. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Société de Réanimation de langue Français, Haute Autorité de Santé, Societe de Pathologie Infectieuse de langue Français. Antibiothérapie des infections à entérobactéries et à Pseudomonas aeruginosa chez l’adulte: place des carbapénèmes et de leurs alternatives (FRENCH). https://www.infectiologie.com/fr/recommandations.html. Published 2023. Accessed April 16, 2023.Google Scholar
Strazzulla, A, Postorino, MC, Youbong, T, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as de-escalation in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cohort study subanalysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;40:15111516. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04184-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of the population

Figure 1

Table 2. Characteristics of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Figure 2

Table 3. Characteristics of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Figure 3

Table 4. Resistance to fluoroquinolones among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients receiving endotracheal intubation

Figure 4

Table 5. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Figure 5

Table 6. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with presence of multi drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates