Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:04:53.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women and Genre in Calpurnius Siculus’ Eclogues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2020

George C. Paraskeviotis
George C. Paraskeviotis*
Affiliation:
Democritus University of Thracegparaske@helit.duth.gr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to examine the ways in which the Calpurnian text converses with the earlier pastoral tradition focusing on the women identified in the collection. Leaving aside the mythical female figures who are also traced in the collection (e.g. Pales and Venus), this study focuses on all the female characters mentioned by male figures, trying to show that women in the Eclogues, among other elements (such as subjects, motifs, intertexts, language and style), constitute a significant means by which Calpurnius shows originality and generic evolution.

It is argued that the female characters in Calpurnian pastoral are the erotic objects of the herdsmen and the recipients of their songs and in that sense they recall the pastoral tradition (Greek and Roman) that Calpurnius inherited. What is more, they are central metapoetic elements which show Calpurnius’ metaliterary engagement with gender in a collection that stresses the originality of the Neronian pastoral. Most importantly, however, they incorporate features and elements from other literary genres (mostly from Roman comedy and love elegy) and in that sense they constitute a significant means by which Calpurnius maintains the generic tensions employed by his literary antecedents (i.e. Vergil) and broadens the limits of pastoral.

Keywords

Calpurnius SiculuspastoralwomengenreVergilcomedyelegy
Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 54 , 2020 , pp. 103 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cairns, F. (1972), Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1994), Virgil. Eclogues with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (1977), Vergil. Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. (2012), Publio Virgilio Marone. Le Bucoliche. Introduzione e Commento. Traduzione di Alfonso Traina. Rome.Google Scholar
Di Lorenzo, E., and Pellegrino, B. (eds.) (2008), T. Calpurnio Siculo. Eclogae. Naples.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1952), The Nature of Roman Comedy. A Study in Popular Entertainment. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Duff, J. W., and Duff., A. M. (eds.) (1935), Minor Latin Poets. Vol. 1. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. (1979), ‘From Polyphemus to Corydon. Virgil, Eclogue 2 and the Idylls of Theocritus’, in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.) Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge, 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, J. M. (ed.) (1912), The Greek Bucolic Poets. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H. R. (ed.) (1999), Virgil: Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid I-VI. Rev. Goold, G. P. (orig. ed. 1916). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fey-Wickert, B. (2002), Calpurnius Siculus: Kommentar zu 2. und 3. Ekloge. Trier.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, A. (1999), Roman Women, trans. Lappin, L.. Chicago.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W. (1976), Nachahmung und eigene Gestaltung in der bukolischen Dichtung des Titus Calpurnius Siculus. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1982), Kinds of Literature. An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007), Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext. Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henkel, J. H. (2011), Writing Poems on Trees. Genre and Metapoetics in Vergil's Eclogues and Georgics. PhD. Diss. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. (1930), Les thèmes bucoliques dans la poésie latine. Brussels.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1998), The Pipes of Pan. Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton. Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1999), Theocritus: A Selection (Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2006), The Shadow of Callimachus. Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry in Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2011), Song Exchange in Roman Pastoral. Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2016), T. Calpurnius Siculus. A Pastoral Poet in Neronian Rome. Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, C. H. (ed.) (1969), The Eclogues of Calpurnius Siculus and M. Aurelius Olympius Nemesianus. London.Google Scholar
Korzeniewski, D. (1971), Hirtengedichte aus neronischer Zeit. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1973), ‘Corydon Revisited: An Interpretation of the Political Eclogues of Calpurnius Siculus’, Ramus 2, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipka, M. (2001), Language in Vergil's Eclogues. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnelli, E. (2006), ‘Bucolic Tradition and Poetic Programme in Calpurnius Siculus', in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden, 467–77.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (2002), Tibullus: Elegies. Text, Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (1996), ‘Calpurnius Siculus’ New aurea aetas’, AC 39, 17–38.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (1982), ‘Neronian Classicism’, AJPh 103, 305–18.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2006), ‘Latin Pastoral after Virgil’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.), Brill's Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden, 451–66.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. (ed.) (1991), Tibullus I. London.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. (ed.) (1994), Tibullus: Elegies II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Myers, K. (1996), ‘The Poet and the Procuress: The Lena in Latin Love Elegy’, JRS 86, 1–21.Google Scholar
Navarro Antolin, F. (ed.) (1996), Lygdamus: Corpus Tibullianum III 1–6. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papanghelis, T. D. (1995), Από τη Βουκολική Ευτοπία στην Πολιτική Ουτοπία. Athens.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. B. (ed.) (1990), The Eclogues of Calpurnius Siculus. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Pichon, R. (1966), Index Verborum Amatorium. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Pretagostini, R. (2006), ‘How Bucolic are Theocritus' Bucolic Singers?', in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.), Brill's Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden, 53–73.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. M., and Fluck, E. J. (1937), A Study of the Greek Love-Names. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (2001), Vergils Eklogen 3 und 7 in der Tradition der lateinischen Streitdichtung. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Stanzel, K. H. (1989), ‘Bukolische Dreiecksverhältnisse. Zu Calpurnius’ und Nemesians zweiter Ekloge’, WJA 15, 183–201.Google Scholar
Vinchesi, M. A. (1991), ‘La Terza Ecloga di Calpurnio Siculo fra Tradizione Bucolica e Tradizione Elegiaca’, Prometheus 17, 259–76.Google Scholar
Vinchesi, M. A. (ed.) (1996), Calpurnio Siculo. Ecloghe. Milan.Google Scholar
Vinchesi, M. A. (2012), ‘Presenze dell'elegia Latina nella poesia bucolica di Calpurnio Siculo’, in Bognini, F. (ed.) Meminisse iuuat: studi in memoria di Violetta de Angelis. Pisa, 705–21.Google Scholar
Vinchesi, M. A. (2014), Calpurnii Siculi Eclogae. Florence.Google Scholar
Vischer, R. (1965), Das enfache Leben. Wort- und motivgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu einem Wertbegriff der antiker Literatur. Göttingen.Google Scholar