Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:23:02.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inscriptions from Aphrodisias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2013

J. M. R. Cormack
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of the considerable epigraphic harvest gathered by W. Kubitschek and W. Reichel in Geyre (Aphrodisias) in 1893, during their stay of sixteen days, only a few inscriptions were published in the Anzeiger der kaiserl. Akademie der Wissensch. zu Wien 1893, 100–3. Some of the inscriptions recorded in Kubitschek and Reichel's notebooks were published independently by Th. Reinach from Gaudin's squeezes, in REG xix (1906), 79–150, 205–98. Reinach's nos. 13, 17, 127, 7, 70, 77, 50, 146 bis, 32, and 62 (all published as new) are respectively nos. 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 14 of Kubitschek and Reichel's article cited above.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 59 , November 1964 , pp. 16 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reinach's oversight is explained by the sentence in op. cit., p. 81, ‘La brièveté de mon séjour (à Vienne) ne m'a pas permis de profiter de son (Benndorf) extrême libéralité pour me livrer à un dépouillement complet (des Schedae).’

2 See American Council of Learned Societies, Bulletin no. 23 (1935), 119–21

3 I am indebted to Mr. M. N. Tod for some valuable criticisms and suggestions in writing this article.

4 For the readings from the squeezes here and in nos. 14, 15, 29, and 41 I am indebted to Mr. A. B. Birnie, who examined them in Vienna.

5 ‘Une fois est employé le verbe (REG 1906, 251, n. 146, 1. 22 [this should be 146 bis, 1. 23]), qui manque dans le dictionnaire de Liddell–Scott–Jones.’ On the same page, n. 4, Robert refers to Kubitschek and Reichel, op. cit. 102, no. 11, and again blames Liddell & Scott, this time, apparently, for not having the noun Ce texte … est absent du dictionnaire de Liddell…Scott…Jones comme des Addenda de M. N. Tod, Hermathena 59 et 60 (1942).’ Mr. M. N. Tod first pointed out this confusion in a review of Hellenica vii in JHS lxx (1950) 82.