^{page 42 note 1} In this paper I use the term bucchero rather than grey ware to indicate grey pottery of the classical period.

^{page 42 note 2} Cf. the early temple at Vroulia; Kinch, Vroulia, p. 9.

^{page 45 note 1} πρακτ. 1910, pp. 252 ff. and 1911, pp. 315 ff.

^{page 47 note 1} J.H.S. lii, p. 240. The other references are as follows:—Longa, Δελτ. 1916, p. 83. Kotilon near Bassae, Ἐφημ. 1903, pp. 159, 163. Gonnos, see p. 45, n. Gortyn, , Mon. Ant. XVIII, p. 206, fig. 15Google Scholar: Dreros, Δελτ. 1918, Παράρτ., pp. 25, 26. Prinias, , Annuario, 1914, p. 22, fig. 6.Google Scholar See also Robertson, Greek and Roman Architecture, pp. 56, 57. Vroulia, Kinch, Vroulia, pp. 8 if. Neandria, , Koldewey, , Programm zum Winkelmannsfeste, 1896, p. 23.Google Scholar

^{page 47 note 2} J.H.S. ix, p. 328; see R.E. ii col. 1648.

^{page 48 note 1} Noack Eleusis, pp. 11, 16; Pl. 20 a.

^{page 48 note 2} Aristotle Ἠθικὰ Νικομάχεια E 1137 b, 30. Noack, op. cit. pp. 16, 17. Weickert, Das Lesbische Kymation, pp. 8 ff.

^{page 48 note 3} B.S.A. xxxi p. 171.

^{page 48 note 4} Two black-glaze fragments seem to have been found under wall V, though they were not observed during excavation. We think they were strays. If, on the other hand, they are the result of the wall having been built at a later date than is suggested above, on ground cleared of its later strata, they must be regarded as contemporary with the late sixth-century material from under the pavement VII.

^{page 48 note 5} B.S.A. xxxi, p. 172.

^{page 51 note 1} See J.H.S. lii, pp. 1 ff.; also Jacobstahl and Nueffer, Gallia Graeca pp. 16 ff.

^{page 51 note 2} This account includes some whole vases from the mandra (p. 63) with the pottery from AC in order to give a more complete series of shapes. The vases from the tombs which we dug ourselves, and which contained hardly any bucchero, are treated separately.

^{page 51 note 3} J.H.S. lli, p. 5.

^{page 51 note 4} See J.H.S. lli, p. 3. The series described by Jacobstahl and Nueffer evidently includes no specimens with wash (op. cit. p. 16).

^{page 52 note 1} These two pieces were from the fill, but the red and buff wares are well represented in the early apsidal building.

^{page 56 note 1} B.S.A. xxxi, p. 178, pl. xxviii, no. 3.

^{page 57 note 1} The preference for wavy lines recalls the class discussed by Technau, , A.M., 1929, pp. 29Google Scholar, 30, but the Antissa examples, besides being of different clay, shew the motive multiplied.

^{page 57 note 2} The sections on geometric and orientalising wares are indebted to the assistance of Mr. Payne.

^{page 58 note 1} Price, Classification: East Greek Pottery, p. 12, type B.

^{page 62 note 1} Blinkenberg, Fibules Grecques et Orientales.

^{page 63 note 1} Dawkins, Artemis Orthia, pl. clxv.

^{page 63 note 2} The bowl seems local. The amphora, one of a pair, is shaped like the Rhodian examples (e.g. Clara Rhodos, IV, p. 162, fig. 161) and may be imported or copied. The date is first half fifth century.

^{page 64 note 1} Winter, , Terracotten, III, 1, p. xlv, pl. 54.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 2} See B.S.A. xxxi, p. 174.

^{page 65 note 1} Decoration corroded.

^{page 65 note 2} The comprehensive notes of Miss Six and Mr. Cook, who supervised the digging of many of the tombs, have been most useful in compiling this report.

^{page 66 note 1} For jugs and amphoriskos, cf. Clara Rhodos III, p. 213, fig. 210.

^{page 67 note 1} Clara Rhodos IV, pp. 208–10, a close parallel.

^{page 67 note 2} Ibid., p. 143, fig. 137 and p. 148, fig. 144.