Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-tr9hg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T05:08:16.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new Inscription of the Deme Halimous1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

Extract

Early in 1921 the Neuchâtel Asphalte Company, in beginning the construction of the new coast road from Old Phaleron to Vouliagmene(see map, Fig. 1), found not far inland from the small promontory of Hagios Kosmas some ancient foundations, and by them the inscription, which is here published. The discovery was communicated by Mr. Bottomley, Manager of the Company, to the British School, and to him I am indebted for permission to publish it, and also for the sketch plan of the ancient foundations here shown (Fig. 2). On the top of a low hill the line of a wall (about 1·50 m. thick) of the late fifth or fourth century B.C., built of rectangular blocks of poros, appeared, and on the top of this the inscription was found as indicated in the plan (Fig. 2). Slightly north of the inscription was a large block running out westwards at right angles to the main wall. If the main wall is the boundary of the Shrine of Dionysos mentioned in the inscription, it is possible that this big block formed part of the shrine itself. In any case it seems likely that we should recognise in these remains, scanty though they are, the ruins of the Dionysion in which the inscription was to be erected. On the south side of the road a double tomb came to light (Fig. 2). In the upper tomb, which was covered by a large tile so curved that it was in section half an ellipse, a small aryballos with a simple anthemion ornament in a very late red-figure style was found with a few much-decayed bones, perhaps those of a child; but in the lower tomb, which was made of two shallow rectangular troughs of terra-cotta, there were only a few bones. The tomb, which cannot be earlier than the late fifth century B.C., would not be likely to have any connection with the Dionysion, and was in any case outside it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 154 note 1 Leonardos, B., Ἀρχ. Ἐφ., 1917, p. 41.Google Scholar

page 154 note 2 Kirchner, , Prosopographia Attica, 8918.Google Scholar

page 154 note 3 I.G., II.2 680 = Ditt. Syll. 3 408.

page 154 note 4 G.G.A., 1913. p. 178.

page 155 note 1 Fouilles de Delphes, III. 2. 159 = Ditt. Syll. 3 403.

page 155 note 2 I.G., II. 323; Pausanias, x. 21. 5.

page 155 note 3 Bechtel, , Hist. Personennamen, p. 524.Google Scholar

page 155 note 4 Plutarch, , Theseus 17Google Scholar; Mommsen, A., Feste d. Stadt Athen, p. 290.Google Scholar

page 155 note 5 Kirchner, op. cit. 7125.

page 155 note 6 Frag. 56 B.

page 155 note 7 LVII. 24 (ed. Dindorf); Kirchner, op. cit. 15485, 7255.

page 155 note 8 Kirchner, op. cit. 11020, 10220; cf. Van Gelder, , lets over Grieksche eigennamen, Meded. Koninkl. Akad. v. Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, LIII. (1921), A. 4.Google Scholar

page 155 note 9 Kirchner, op. cit. 15471.

page 156 note 1 See notes on ll. 20–22, p. 159.

page 156 note 2 LVII. 13 (ed. Dindorf).

page 156 note 3 Aves, 496; cf. Harpocration, Stephanus Byz., and Bekker, Anecd. Gr., s.v.

page 156 note 4 I. G., II. 1807; Milchhoefer, , Ath. Mitt., XIII. (1888), p. 359.Google Scholar

page 156 note 5 Topography of Athens and the Demi, II. p. 53.

page 156 note 6 Haussoullier, , La Vie Municipale, p. 44, note 3.Google Scholar

page 156 note 7 Loeper, , Ath. Mitt., XVII. (1892), p. 376 ff.Google Scholar; Milchhoefer, , Ath. Mitt., XVIII. (1893), p. 293 ff.Google Scholar; Kolbe, Pauly-Wissowa, s.v.

page 156 note 8 Schol. ad Aristoph., Thesmoph., 80.

page 156 note 9 Curtius-Kaupert, , Karten von Attika, Text II., p. 1 ff., p. 29Google Scholar; cf. Loeper, loc. cit., p. 378.

page 156 note 10 cf. Herodotus, VIII. 96 (cf. How and Wells ad loc.); Plutarch, , Solon, 8Google Scholar; Polyaenus, 1. 02; Hesychius, Stephanus Byz., s.v. and Bekker, , Anecd. Gr., p. 275.Google Scholar

page 157 note 1 I. 1. 5.

page 157 note 2 The best account is still that of Haussoullier, , La Vie Municipale en Attique (Paris, 1888)Google Scholar, but cf. also Daremberg-Saglio and Pauly-Wissowa, s.v.; J. B. Edwards, The Demesman in Attic Life.

page 157 note 3 e.g. Schoemann-Lipsius, , Griech. Altert., I.4, p. 390Google Scholar; Gilbert, , Griechische Staatsalterthümer, p. 204 ff.Google Scholar; Haussoullier, op. cit. p. 58, is right.

page 157 note 4 Daremberg-Saglio, s.v. ἀρχαἱ cf. Demosthenes, LVIII. 37.

page 157 note 5 For ὑπἑρ in this sense cf. Nachmanson, , Ath. Mitt., XXXII. (1907), p. 70Google Scholar; Guenther, Indogerman. Forsch., XX., p. 157; Ziebarth, , Aus d. gr. Schulwesen, p. 12.Google Scholar

page 157 note 6 LVII. 71.

page 157 note 7 I.G., II. 1055 = Inscr. Jurid. Grecq., p. 238.

page 158 note 1 I.G., II. 1059 (2); cf. Inscr. Jurid. Grecq., pp. 236 ff., 250.

page 158 note 2 Demosthenes, LVII. 78.

page 158 note 3 I.G., II. 570, 571, 572, 578.

page 158 note 4 Lipsius, , Att. Recht, p. 674Google Scholar (the works of Philippi and Willenbuecher there referred to say nothing about this question); for the terminology see Meurs, J. H. v., Rechtsgedingen over bepaalde goederen in oud-Helleense rechten, (Diss.) Utrecht, 1914, pp. 13 ff.Google Scholar

page 158 note 5 The engraver wrote φ by mistake instead of Θ.

page 158 note 6 Ant. Jud., XIV. 10. 23.

page 158 note 7 Strom., IV. 22. 140.

page 158 note 8 s.v.

page 158 note 9 De Abstinentia, II. 18.

page 158 note 10 I.G., II.2 495. See also Schmitthenner, K. E. W., De coronarum apud Athenienses honoribus (Berlin, 1891), p. 17 ff.Google Scholar; Larfeld, , Handbuch, p. 810.Google Scholar

page 158 note 11 cf. I.G., II. 573. 575. 579.

page 158 note 12 Haussoullier, op. cit. p. 12; Schoemann-Lipsius, I. p. 385; Gilbert, op. cit. p. 205; Toepffer, , Hermes, XXX. pp. 391 ff.Google Scholar; I deal with the same subject in Mnemosyne, L. (1922), p. 87 ff. On the ληξ. λρ see de Sanctis, ᾿Ατθἱς p. 336, n. 1; Gaertringen, Hiller v., Sitz. Akad. d. Wiss. Berlin, XXXVII. (1919), p. 668.Google Scholar

page 158 note 13 VII. 16, 17.

page 159 note 1 I.G., II. 841b = Ditt. Syll. 3 921.

page 159 note 2 LVII. (ed. Dindorf).

page 159 note 3 Ath. Pol., XLII. 1; LIII. 4; cf. Harpocration, s.v. στρατεία ἐν τοῖς ἐπωνύμοις

page 159 note 4 Ath. Pol., LIII., 4; Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, , Aristoteles u. Athen, I., p. 194Google Scholar; A. Brenot, Recherches sur l'Ephébie Attigue.

page 159 note 5 VII. 1.

page 159 note 6 See Wyse ad loc; Mueller, , Untersuchungen z. Gesch. d. att. Buerger u. Eherechts, p. 757Google Scholar, is partly right, but the plural means the same as the singular.

page 160 note 1 Beiträge, p. 254; cf. I. G., II. 603b, with Wilhelm's restoration, ᾿Εφ. ᾿Αρχ., 1905, 232, 1061; Rev. Ét. Gr., XV. p. 140, 2; Athenaeus, V. 210 f. (= XII. p. 527c), where Poland, (Gesch. Griech. Vereinswesens, p. 55Google Scholar) has misunderstood the meaning of λραμματεῖα

page 160 note 2 s.v. λραμματεῖον

page 160 note 3 Nubes, 37; cf. Harpocration and Suidas, s.v. Δήμαρχος and the scholiast on Aeschines, , c. Timarch., 18.Google Scholar

page 160 note 4 Παρά may here have the same force as ὦν κύριος τῶν γραμματείων, Demosthenes, LVII, 11 (see above).

page 160 note 5 I. G., II.2 29.

page 160 note 6 cf. Meisterhans, , Grammatik,3 p. 39.Google Scholar

page 160 note 7 e.g. Kollytos, , Demosthenes, , De Corona, XVIII. 288, 180Google Scholar; Aeschines, , c. Timarch., 157.Google Scholar

page 160 note 8 cf. Nilsson, , Studia de Dionysiis Atticis, Lund, 1900, pp. 145 ff.Google Scholar

page 160 note 9 Demosthenes, LVII. 59, 77.

page 160 note 10 Pausanias, I. 31. 1.