Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:51:49.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity of Late-Glacial and Holocene Climates to the Combined Effects of Orbital Parameter Changes and Lower Boundary Condition Changes: “Snapshot” Simulations with A General Circulation Model for 18, 9, AND 6 ka BP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John E. Kutzbach
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
P. J. Guetter
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sensitivity experiments can be used to illustrate the response of the general circulation to prescribed changes in lower boundary conditions (such as ocean temperature) or external forcing conditions (such as solar radiation). The climatic record from the late-glacial and the Holocene provides examples for both types of prescribed change experiments. A number of general circulation model experiments have been carried out. These are reviewed.

At 18 ka 8P, orbital parameter values were very much like those of today, but the lower boundary conditions (ocean temperature, ice-sheet extent, etc.) were very different. The change in ocean temperature, and ice-sheet extent and thickness, were prescribed from the results of the Climate: Long-range Investigation Mapping and Prediction (CLIMAP) project.

At 9 ka BP, orbital parameter values were very different from present, leading to increased radiation in July and decreased radiation in January (compared to present). The North American ice sheet still covered a significant area, so that lower boundary conditions also differed from the present ones. The combined and individual effects of these prescribed changes on the general circulation are reviewed, particularly in the context of changes of the monsoon circulation.

At 6 ka BP, the solar radiation distribution differed from that of today in much the same fashion as at 9 ka BP, although the magnitude of the change was reduced. Lower boundary conditions were probably very similar to those of today.

A series of experimental results from 18, 9, and 6 ka BP are presented as “snapshot” estimates of the paleoclimate of those times. The results are based upon simulations with the community climate model of the National Center for Atmospheric Research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1984

1 Introduction

The Cooperative Holocene Mapping Project (COHMAP) aims at producing global maps of paleoclimatic conditions for 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 ka BP (Reference WebbWebb 1984).

These maps, along with the Climate: Long-range Investigation Mapping and Prediction (CLIMAP) reconstruction of climatic conditions for 18 ka BP (CLIMAP Project Members 1981), will provide “snapshots” of past climates at intervals of 3 ka covering a period of major climatic change: full glacial, deglaciation, full interglacial, present. Diagnostic studies of the changes in the large-scale climatic patterns should advance our knowledge of the dynamics of climate.

To complement the sequence of global paleoclimatic maps, COHMAP is preparing a sequence of general circulation model experiments for the same times: 3,6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 ka BP. Whereas zonal-average climate models are well suited for a wide range of paleoclimate sensitivity experiments involving orbital parameter changes, lower boundary condition changes, and internal feedback parameterizations (for example, Reference Suarez and HeldSuarez and Held 1976, Reference Suarez and Held1979, Reference Schneider and ThompsonSchneider and Thompson 1979 Reference Birchfield, Weertman and LundeBirchfield and others 1982), the general circulation model provides the unique opportunity for detailed regional- and continental-scale intercomparisons of model simulations with the observed paleoclimate.

The paleoclimate simulations described here are for 6, 9, and 18 ka BP and involve studies of the response of a general circulation model to both lower boundary condition changes (sea-surface temperature, glacial ice, etc.) and changes of the seasonal cycle of solar radiation. This summary is in the form of a brief progress report because many aspects of the computational work planned by COHMAP remain incomplete. The experiments for 3, 12, and 15 ka BP must be finished, and further experimentation is planned for all of the designated times using improved versions of the general circulation model. Moreover, detailed intercomparison of the model results and the paleoclimatic observations remains to be accomplished.

2 Review of Previous Work

Gates (Reference Gates and Berger1980, Reference Gates1982) has reviewed paleoclimate modeling studies and summarized the problems and approaches. In order to simulate the past climate with a general circulation mortel, it is necessary to specify certain external conditions, such as the magnitude and seasonal distribution of solar radiation, and certain lower boundary conditions, such as the location and size of ice sheets. Ice sheets are, of course, an integral part of the climate system and would not be specified as a boundary condition in a completely general climate model. However, the time required for the growth and decay of ice sheets is long compared to the time-scale of processes normally included in atmospheric general circulation models, and it is therefore convenient for some purposes to prescribe the ice sheet or other lower boundary conditions and study a restricted (less general) climate system.

The sequence of paleoclimate experiments planned by COHMAP involves specification of both external and lower boundary conditions and combinations thereof.The sensitivity of a low resolution general circulation model to changes of Earth’s orbital parameters has been studied by Reference KutzbachKutzbach (1981) and Reference Kutzbach and Otto-BliesnerKutzbach and Otto-Bliesner (1982). The seasonal cycle of solar radiation at 9 ka BP was strikingly different from the present because the perihelion was in July (it is now in January) and the axial tilt of the Earth was greater then. There was an amplified seasonal cycle of solar radiation in the northern hemisphere compared to the present (more radiation in July, less in January) and the general circulation model simulated stronger summer and winter monsoon circulations over Africa and southern Asia. In one version of the 9 ka BP experiment, the location and size of the remnant North American ice sheet was specified in order to isolate both the combined and separate model response to 9 ka BP radiation and ice-sheet conditions (Reference Kutzbach and Otto-BliesnerKutzbach and Otto-Bliesner 1982).

The general circulation model experiments with 9 ka BP boundary conditions have been repeated with a different general circulation model, the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (NCAR CCM) with similar results (Reference Kutzbach, Guetter, Imbrie and BergerKutzbach and Guetter in press). The NCAR CCM has higher spatial resolution and more detailed physical parameterizations compared to the low resolution model used in the earlier experiments, and therefore the results can be compared more readily with paleoclimatic evidence.

At around 18 ka BP, the external solar radiation conditions were similar to those at present (in July and January), but there were major changes, compared to present, in sea-surface temperature patterns, sea-ice extent, land albedo, and, of course, ice-sheet location and size. A number of experiments with general circulation models have used the lower boundary conditions specified by CLIMAP (1976) in order to simulate the atmospheric circulation for the time of glacial maximum (Reference GatesGates 1976[a], Reference Gates[b], Reference Manabe and HahnManabe and Hahn 1977).

3 Description of Model and Experiments

3(a) Model

A description of the NCAR CCM and its simulation of the modern January and July climate is provided by Reference Pitcher, Malone, Ramanathan, Blackmon, Puri and BourkePitcher and others 1983. The model incorporates atmospheric dynamics based upon the equations of fluid motion; it includes radiative and convective processes, condensation, and evaporation. A surface heat budget is computed over land. Orographic influences of mountains (and ice sheets) are included. Sea-surface temperatures, sea-ice limit, and snow cover are prescribed. The model has nine vertical levels and a spectral representation, to wave number 15, of the horizontal fields of wind, temperature and moisture. The spectral representation 1s converted to a grid of 4.4° latitude by 7.5° longitude.

The version of the NCAR CCM used here was configured for so-called perpetual July and January experiments (Reference Pitcher, Malone, Ramanathan, Blackmon, Puri and BourkePitcher and others 1983); the model was run for 120 simulated days but with solar radiation held constant for January 16 or July 16 values. The experiments were started with all model variables set at values for day 400 of an NCAR CCM control simulation, but with the solar radiation and/or lower boundary conditions changed from modern to 18, 9, or 6 ka BP values. The first 30 days of each 120-day simulation were treated as an adjustment period and ignored. The final 90 days of each simulation were then averaged and compared to the control (modern) simulation.

Further details on the experimental procedure and the statistical testing of the results are found in Reference Kutzbach and Otto-BliesnerKutzbach and Otto-Bliesner (1982) and Reference Kutzbach, Guetter, Imbrie and BergerKutzbach and Guetter (in press).

3(b) Experiments

The changes of solar radiation and lower boundary conditions for 18, 9, and 6 ka BP are summarized in Table I. The reasons for prescribing the lower boundary conditions for 6 and 9 ka BP at modern values are detailed in Reference Kutzbach and Otto-BliesnerKutzbach and Otto-Bliesner (1982). The one exception was the North American ice sheet, which, at 9 ka BP, still covered 30 grid points in the model, i.e. an area of 5.4 × 106 km .The simulated climate of 9 ka BP is mainly a response to the changed orbital parameters; the North American ice sheet has a major effect on the simulated climate only in the vicinity of the ice sheet itself (Reference Kutzbach and Otto-BliesnerKutzbach and Otto-Bliesner 1982, Reference Kutzbach, Guetter, Imbrie and BergerKutzbach and Guetter in press). At 18 ka BP, the solar radiation values for January and July are within 1% of modern values at all latitudes, but there are major changes in lower boundary conditions. For example the North American ice sheet covers 77 model grid points (14.4 × 106 km2) and the European ice sheet covers 56 model grid points (7.9 × 106 km2). The 18 ka BP conditions for sea-ice extent, sea-surface temperature, and land albedo are found in CLIMAP (1981). The lower boundary conditions from CLIMAP (1981) differ somewhat from CLIMAP (1976) estimates.

Table I Orbital Parameter Values and Lower Boundary Conditions for General Circulation Experiments for Present Conditions (0) and for 6, 9 and 18 ka BP.

4 Results

A detailed description of the results of the 6, 9, and 18 ka BP simulations is in preparation. This preliminary report summarizes certain area-average results for the land surface and for the region of the monsoon climates of the northern hemisphere, and certain global-average statistics (land plus ocean) (Table II).

Table II Area-Average Values of Incoming Solar Radiation (S), Simulated Surface Temperature (T) and Precipitation(P)

For July, the increased solar radiation at 6 and 9 ka BP (compared to present) is associated with higher northern hemisphere land temperature (higher by 1.5 and 1.8 K, respectively) and increased monsoon rains (greater by 1.1 and 1.4 mm d−1, or about 20%). In contrast, the changed lower boundary conditions at 18 ka BP are associated with lower northern hemisphere land temperature (lower by 5.7 K) and decreased rains (about 10% less for the global average, the northern hemisphere land average, and the monsoon-region average).

For January, the decreased solar radiation at 6 and 9 ka BP (compared to present) is associated with lower temperatures. Precipitation changes are small. With boundary conditions for 18 ka BP, the northern hemisphere land temperature 1s lowered by 7.4 K and precipitation is decreased.

Viewed as a sequence of climatic “snapshots”, these area-averaged results indicate that, compared to present, the climate of 18 ka BP was colder-and drier than now in both July and January; seasonality (the July to January range) was not greatly different than now. By 9 ka BP, and continuing to 6 ka BP, the climate had warmed dramatically compared to conditions at 18 ka BP. Moreover, the amplified seasonal cycle of solar radiation in the northern hemisphere produced an increased range of the seasonal temperature extremes (warmer northern hemisphere summers and colder northern hemisphere winters) and increased summer monsoon rains. During the period since 6 ka BP, the seasonal extremes of northern hemisphere land temperature have been reduced and monsoon rainfall has decreased.

With this overview of the broad-scale features of the simulated climate of the past 18 ka, a more detailed analysis of regional climatic sequences {for North America, for polar regions, etc.) will be prepared and compared with the paleoclimatic record.

Research grants to the University of Wisconsin-Madison from the US National Science Foundation S Climate Dynamics Program (grants no. ATM-7926039 and no. ATM-8111455) supported this work. The computations were made at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), which is sponsored by the US National Science Foundation, with a computing grant from the NCAR Computing Facility (no. 35381017).

References

Birchfield, G E, Weertman, J, Lunde, A T 1982 A model study of the role of high-latitude topography in the climatic response to orbital insolation anomalies. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 39(1): 7187 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLIMAP Project Members 1976 The surface of the ice-age Earth. Science 191(4232): 11311137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLIMAP Project Members 1981 Seasonal reconstructions of the Earth’s surface at the last glacial maximum. Geological Society of America Map and Chart Series MC-36Google Scholar
Gates, W L 1976[a] Modeling the ice-age climate. Science 191(4232): 11381144 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, W L 1976[b] The numerical simulation of ice-age climate with a global general circulation model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 33: 18441873 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, W L 1980 The climate system and its portrayal by climate models. In Berger, A (ed) Climate Variations and variability: facte and theories. Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Co.: 435460 Google Scholar
Gates, W L 1982 PaleoclImatic modeling — a review with reference to problems and prospects for the pre-Pleistocene. In climate in Earth history. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences: 2642 (Studies in Geophysics Series)Google Scholar
Kutzbach, J E 1981 Monsoon climate of the early Holocene: climatic experiment using the Earth’s orbital parameters for 9000 years ago. Science 214(4516): 5961 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutzbach, J E, Guetter, P J In press The sensitivity of monsoon climates to orbital parameter changes for 9000 years B.P.: experiments with the NCAR General circulation Model. In Imbrie, J, Berger, A (eds) Milankovitch and climate change. Amsterdam, Elsevier Google Scholar
Kutzbach, J E, Otto-Bliesner, B L 1982 The sensitivity of the African-Asian monsoonal climate to orbital parameter changes for 9000 yr B.P, in a low-resolution general circulation model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 39(6): 11771188 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manabe, S, Hahn, D G 1977 Simulation of the tropical climate of an ice age. Journal of Geophysical Research 82(27): 38893911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, E J, Malone, R C, Ramanathan, V, Blackmon, M L, Puri, K, Bourke, W 1983 January and July simulations with a spectral general circulation model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 40: 580604 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S H, Thompson, S L 1979 Ice ages and orbital variations: some simple theory and modeling. Quaternary Research 12(2): 188203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, M J, Held, I M 1976 Modeling climatic response to orbital parameter variations. Nature 263(5572): 4647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, M J, Held, I M 1979 The sensitivity of an energy balance climate model to variations in the orbital parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research 84(8): 48254836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, T III 1984 A global paleoclimatic database for 6 and 9 ka BP (Abstract). Annals of Glaciology 5: 236237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table I Orbital Parameter Values and Lower Boundary Conditions for General Circulation Experiments for Present Conditions (0) and for 6, 9 and 18 ka BP.

Figure 1

Table II Area-Average Values of Incoming Solar Radiation (S), Simulated Surface Temperature (T) and Precipitation(P)