Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:57:02.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of restricted feeding of prepubertal ewe lambs on growth performance and mammary gland development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2010

L. Villeneuve ,
D. Cinq-Mars  and
P. Lacasse
L. Villeneuve
Affiliation:
Centre d’Expertise en Production Ovine du Québec, La Pocatière, QC, Canada, G0R 1Z0 Département des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4
D. Cinq-Mars
Affiliation:
Département des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4
P. Lacasse*
Affiliation:
Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1M 1Z3
*
†E-mail: Lacassep@agr.gc.ca
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of restricted feeding before puberty on growth performance and mammary gland development in replacement ewe lambs. At weaning, 72 Dorset ewe lambs were assigned to one of the three diets: an ad libitum control diet with medium-quality forage (MQF; diet A-MQF); a restricted diet with the same forage as A, but less feed concentrate (diet R-MQF); or a high-quality forage (HQF) diet (diet F-HQF). The quantity of concentrate offered to the group R-MQF and F-HQF ewe lambs was adjusted to obtain 70% of the control ewe lambs’ growth rate. The diets were offered for 75 days after weaning to cover the allometric phase of mammary gland development. During this period, average daily gain (ADG) was 223 and 229 g/day for groups R-MQF and F-HQF, respectively, compared to 305 g/day for group A-MQF (P < 0.0001). At the end of this period, 28 ewe lambs were slaughtered and their mammary gland was collected. Parenchymal fresh tissue weight tended to be higher for groups R-MQF and F-HQF compared to group A-MQF (P = 0.09). Stroma weight was greater (P < 0.05) for the group A-MQF ewe lambs than for those in the other treatments. Total DNA and total protein in parenchymal tissue tended to be greater for groups R-MQF and F-HQF (P = 0.09 and P = 0.07, respectively). Dry fat-free tissue was greater for groups R-MQF and F-HQF (P < 0.05). The remaining ewe lambs were fed the same haylage and barley diet until their first lambing. During this period, compensatory growth was observed. ADG was greater (P < 0.01) for groups R-MQF and F-HQF than for group A-MQF, and feed conversion was improved (P < 0.01) for groups R-MQF and F-HQF compared with the control, whereas the dry matter intake was similar for all groups. Live body weight, loin eye depth and backfat depth at breeding and around lambing were similar for all groups. The results of this study suggest that restricted feeding before puberty improves mammary gland development without compromising growth performance in ewe lambs.

Keywords

compensatory growthplane of nutritionfeed conversionallometric
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , June 2010 , pp. 944 - 950
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, RR 1975. Mammary gland growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1998. Official methods of analysis, vol. 2, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bowden, CE, Plaut, K, Maple, RL 1995. Negative effects of a high level of nutrient intake on mammary gland development of prepubertal goats. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 1728–1733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals (ed. ED Olfert, BM Cross and AA McWilliam), vol. 1, 2nd edition. CCAC, Ottawa, ON, Canada 212 pp.Google Scholar
Capuco, AV, Smith, JJ, Waldo, DR, Rexroad, CE Jr 1995. Influence of prepubertal dietary regimen on mammary growth of Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 2709–2725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, SL, Vonnahme, KA, Yelich, JV, Dolezal, HG, Wettemann, RP 1999. Effect of growth rate on mammary gland development at puberty in beef heifers. In 1999 Animal Science Research Report, pp. 293–295. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.Google Scholar
Foldager, J, Sejrsen, K 1991. Rearing intensity in dairy heifers and the effect on subsequent milk production. Report from the National Institute of Animal Science. Foulum, Denmark, no. 693, p. 131.Google Scholar
Hornick, JL, Van Eenaeme, C, Gérard, O, Dufrasne, I, Istasse, L 2000. Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 19, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imagawa, W, Yang, J, Guzman, R, Nandi, S 1994. Control of mammary gland development. In The Physiology of Reproduction Lactation, 2nd edition (ed. E Knobil and JD Neill), pp. 1033–1063. Raven Press, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Johnsson, ID, Hart, IC 1985. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 1. The effects of level of nutrition on growth and mammary development in female lambs. Animal Production 41, 323–332.Google Scholar
Johnsson, ID, Hart, IC, Turvey, A 1986. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 3. The effects of restricted feeding or daily administration of bovine growth hormone and bromocriptine on mammary growth and morphology. Animal Production 42, 53–63.Google Scholar
Kamalzadeh, A, Koops, WJ, Van Bruchem, J 1998. Feed quality restriction and compensatory growth in growing sheep: Modelling changes in body dimensions. Livestock Production Science 53, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labarca, C, Paigen, K 1980. A simple, rapid and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Analytical Biochemistry 102, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, W, Harrison, RD 1981. Effects of different rates of live weight gain during rearing on the performance of Friesian heifers in their first lactation. Abstract. Animal Production 32, 362.Google Scholar
Little, W, Kay, RM 1979. The effects of rapid rearing and early calving on the subsequent performance of dairy heifers. Animal Production 29, 131–142.Google Scholar
McCann, MA, Goode, L, Harvey, RW, Caruolo, EV, Mann, DL 1989. Effects of rapid weight gain to puberty on reproduction, mammary development and lactation in ewe lambs. Theriogenology 32, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFadden, TB, Daniel, TE, Akers, RM 1990. Effects of plane of nutrition, growth hormone and unsaturated fat on mammary growth in prepubertal lambs. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3171–3179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, MJ, Capuco, AV, Ross, DA, Lintault, LM, Van Amburgh, ME 2006. Development and nutritional regulation of prepubertal heifer mammary gland: I. Parenchyma and fat pad mass and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4289–4297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Peclaris, GM, Nikolaou, E, Kann, G, Eleftheriou, P, Yupsanis, T, Mantzios, A 1994. Effects of plane of nutrition and photoperiod on mammary development in prepubertal lambs. World Review of Animal Production 29, 74–80.Google Scholar
Peclaris, GM, Nikolaou, E, Kann, G, Eleftheriou, P, Yupsanis, T, Mantzios, A, Koutsotolis, K 1997. Effects of melatonin and plane of nutrition on mammary development in prepubertal boutsiko mountain breed ewe lambs. Theriogenology 48, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, WJ 1990. Compensatory growth in cattle and sheep. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series B, Livestock Feeds and Feeding 60, 653–664.Google Scholar
Ryan, WJ, Williams, IH, Moir, RJ 1993a. Compensatory growth in sheep and cattle. I. Growth pattern and feed intake. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1609–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, WJ, Williams, IH, Moir, RJ 1993b. Compensatory growth in sheep and cattle. II. Changes in body composition and tissue weights. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1623–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute 2002. Statistical Analysis System, Release 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sejrsen, K, Huber, JT, Tucker, HA, Akers, RM 1982. Influence of nutrition on mammary development in pre- and post-pubertal heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 793–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejrsen, K, Purup, S, Akers, RM 1990. Manipulation of growth and development of the mammary gland in heifers for increased milk yield. Proceedings of the 23rd International Dairy Congress 1, 679–689.Google Scholar
Thornton, RF, Hood, RL, Jones, PN, Re, VM 1979. Compensatory growth in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umberger, SH, Goode, L, Caruolo, EV, Harvey, RW, Britt, JH, Linnerud, AC 1985. Effects of accelerated growth during rearing on reproduction and lactation in ewes lambing at 13 to 15 months of age. Theriogenology 23, 555–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wester, TJ, Britton, RA, Klopfenstein, TJ, Ham, GA, Hickok, DT, Krehbiel, CR 1995. Differential effects of plane of protein or energy nutrition on visceral organs and hormones in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1674–1688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zidi, A, Ayadi, M, Caja, G, Such, X, Ghirardi, JJ, Albanell, E 2005. Efectos de la alimentación antes de la pubertad sobre la vida productiva de ovejas lecheras de raza Manchega y Lacaune. ITEA: Producción Animal 26, 249–251.Google Scholar
Zidi, A, Caja, G, Ayadi, M, Castillo, V, Flores, C, Such, X 2007. Comparación de los efectos de la alimentación pre-puberal en el desarollo mamario y la producción de leche a la primera lactación en ovino de raza Manchega y Lacaune. ITEA: Producción Animal 28, 285–287.Google Scholar