Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:41:44.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of particle size of alfalfa hay and reconstitution with water on intake, digestion and milk production in Holstein dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

A. Teimouri Yansari  and
R. Primohammadi
A. Teimouri Yansari*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Aquacultures, University of Agriculture and Natural Resource Science of Sari, Sari, Iran
R. Primohammadi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Uromia, Uromia, Iran
*
E-mail: astymori@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-four lactating Holstein dairy cows (12 first lactation and 12 multiparous; day in milk = 11 ± 5 days) were allotted to a randomised complete block design in a 2 × 3 factorial with four replicates per treatment to evaluate the effects of two methods of alfalfa feeding (dry and reconstituted to achieve a theoretical dry matter (DM) content of 350 g/kg) and three geometric mean (GM) particle sizes of alfalfa (9.13, 4.51 and 1.20 mm) on performance of dairy cows for a period of 28 days. Diets were offered for ad libitum intake as total mixed rations (TMR). The GM particle size, its standard deviation, and the values of physical effectiveness factor of alfalfa and TMR decreased as alfalfa particle size decreased. Reduction of particle size and reconstitution of alfalfa increased the bulk density and the functional specific gravity of alfalfa and rations. Reduction of particle size decreased insoluble dry matter, water-holding capacity, and hydration rate of alfalfa. As particle size decreased, the amount of physically effective NDF in the ration (g/kg) decreased but the daily intake of physically effective NDF (kg/day) increased. Reduction of particle size and reconstitution increased dry matter intake (DMI) and ruminal passage rate, but reduced NDF and ash digestibilities, ruminal pH, N-NH3, milk fat, total chewing activity, rumination and eating time, total and ruminal mean retention time, and time delay of marker. Increased functional specific gravity, from reduced forage particle size and the reconstitution of alfalfa, was the most important factor influencing DMI, milk composition, and chewing activity.

Keywords

dairy cowparticle sizephysically effective NDFspecific gravityreconstitution
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , February 2009 , pp. 218 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE) 2002. Method of determining and expressing particle size of chopped forage (S424.1), 70th edition. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA.Google Scholar
Armentano, L, Pereira, M 1997. Measuring the effectiveness of fibre by animal response trials. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1416–1425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2002. Official methods of analysis, vol. 1, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Rode, LM 1994. Compressed baled alfalfa for primiparous and multiparous dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 1003–1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, EW, Pearce, GR, Burnett, J, Pillinger, SL 1973. Changes in some physical characteristics of the digesta in the reticulorumen of cows fed once daily. The British Journal of Nutrition 29, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giger-Reverdin, S 2000. Characterization of feedstuffs for ruminants using some physical parameters. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, RJ, Colenbrander, VF, Mertens, DR 1990. Milk fat depression in dairy cows: role of particle size of alfalfa hay. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 1823–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, WL, Williams, VJ 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep 4. Passage of markers through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from changes in concentration of markers in feces. The British Journal of Nutrition 30, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, AP, Welch, JG 1985. Effects of particle size and forage composition on functional specific gravity. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 1181–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaske, M, Engelhardt, WV 1990. The effect of size and density on mean retention time of particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 63, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, PM 1984. Techniques in particle size analysis of feed and digesta in ruminants. Occasional Publ. no. 1. Canadian Society of Animal Science, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Kononoff PJ 2002. The effect of ration particle size on dairy cows in early lactation. PhD. The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Krause, KM, Combs, DK 2002. Effects of forage particle size, forage source, and grain fermentability on performance and ruminal pH in midlactation cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1382–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammers, BP, Buckmaster, DR, Heinrichs, AJ 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forages and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 922–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, DR 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1463–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pasha, TN, Prigge, EC, Russell, RW, Bryan, WB 1994. Influence of moisture content of forage diets on intake and digestion by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2455–2463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poppi, DP, Norton, BW, Minson, DJ, Hendricksen, RE 1980. The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. The Journal of Agricultural Science 94, 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 1998. User’s guide: statistics, version 8.2 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shaver, RD, Nytes, AJ, Satter, LD, Jorgenson, NA 1988. Influence of feed intake, forage physical form, and forage fibre content on particle size of masticated forage, ruminal digesta, and feces of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 1566–1578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stetter Neel, JP, Prigge, EC, Townsend, EC 1995. Influence of moisture content of forage on ruminal functional specific gravity and passage of digesta. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3094–3102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teimouri Yansari, A, Valizadeh, R, Naserian, A, Christensen, D, Eftekhari Shahroodi, F 2004. Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 3912–3924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uden, P, Colucci, E, Van Soest, PJ 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium, and cobalt as markers in digesta rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattiaux MA 1990. A mechanism influencing passage of forage particles through the reticulorumen: change in specific gravity during hydration and digestion. PhD, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Woodford, ST, Murphy, MR 1988. Effect of forage physical form on chewing activity, dry matter intake, and rumen function of dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 674–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed