Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T02:18:03.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Banana meal for feeding pigs: digestive utilization, growth performance and feeding behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2014

D. Renaudeau ,
J. Brochain ,
M. Giorgi ,
B. Bocage ,
M. Hery ,
E. Crantor ,
C. Marie-Magdeleine  and
H. Archimède
D. Renaudeau*
Affiliation:
INRA UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, F-97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
J. Brochain
Affiliation:
INRA UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, F-97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
M. Giorgi
Affiliation:
INRA UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, F-97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
B. Bocage
Affiliation:
INRA UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, F-97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
M. Hery
Affiliation:
SICA Les Producteurs de Guadeloupe, F-97100 Basse Terre, Guadeloupe, France
E. Crantor
Affiliation:
Grands Moulins des Antilles, F-97122 Baie Mahault, Guadeloupe, France
C. Marie-Magdeleine
Affiliation:
INRA UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, F-97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
H. Archimède
Affiliation:
INRA UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, F-97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
*
E-mail: david.renaudeau@rennes.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

The main objective of the present work was to determine the nutritional value and the strategies of using green banana meal (BM) in growing pigs. Two trials involving a total of 96 growing pigs were designed to study the effect of the harvest stage on the nutritional and energy values of BM (trial 1) and to evaluate the consequence of feeding gradual levels of BM on growth performance and feeding behavior in growing pigs (trial 2). In trial 1, the digestive utilization of three diets including 40% BM were compared with a control (C) soybean meal-corn diet in two batches of 12 pigs. BM was obtained from fruits harvested at 750 degrees-days (DD; early harvesting stage), 900 DD (normal harvesting stage) and 1150 DD (late harvesting stage). In trial 2, 72 Large White pigs were grouped in pens of nine animals and were given ad libitum access to one of the four dietary treatments (two pens/diet) differing from the rate of inclusion of 900 DD BM (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%). The estimated energy apparent digestibility coefficients of BM increased with the harvest stage (75.5%, 80.7% and 83.2% for BM at 750, 900 and 1150 DD, respectively). Digestible energy and metabolizable energy values were higher for BM at 1150 DD (13.56 and 13.05 MJ/kg DM, respectively) than at 900 DD (13.11 and 12.75 MJ/kg DM, respectively) or at 750 DD (12.00 and 11.75 MJ/kg DM, respectively). In trial 2, average daily gain and feed conversion ratio were not affected (P>0.05) by the rate of BM inclusion (822 g/day and 2.75 kg/kg on average, respectively). Feed intake and feeding behavior parameters were not significantly influenced by the dietary treatments except for the rate of feed ingestion with a lower value for the diet with 40% of BM (27.4 v. 32.2 g/min on average; P<0.01) when compared with the other diets. Results of this study indicate that the energy value of BM increases with the harvest stage and that BM can be incorporated up to 60% in growing finishing pig diets.

Keywords

growing pigsbanana mealenergyharvest stage
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , April 2014 , pp. 565 - 571
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdollahi, MR 2011. Influence of feed processing on the performance, nutrient utilisation, and gut development of poultry and feed quality. Thesis PhD, Massey University, New Zeland.Google Scholar
AOAC 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Archimède, H, Gourdine, JL, Fanchone, A, Alexandre, G, Marie Magdeleine, C, Calif, E, Fleury, J, Anais, C and Renaudeau, D 2011. Le bananier et ses produits dans l’alimentation animale. Revue Innovations Agronomiques 16, 181–192.Google Scholar
Bigelow, JA and Houpt, TR 1988. Feeding and drinking patterns in young pigs. Physiology & Behavior 43, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celleri, H, Oliva, F and Maner, JH 1971. Green banana meal for feeding growing-finishing pigs. Memoria, Associacion Latinoamericana de Produccion Animal 6, 148 (abstract).Google Scholar
Clavijo, H and Maner, J 1975. The use of waste bananas for swine feed. In Proceedings of the Conference on Animal Feeds of Tropical and Subtropical (ed. D Haliday), pp. 99–106. Tropical Products Institute, London, UK.Google Scholar
Fomunyam, RT 1991. Economic aspects of banana and plantain use in animal feeding: the Cameroon experience. In Roots, tubers and bananas in animal feeding (ed. D Machin and S Nyvold), pp. 277–289. CIAT, California, Colombia.Google Scholar
Heuzé, V, Tran, G, Archimède, H, Lessire, R and Renaudeau, D 2011. Bananas fruits. In Feedipedia.org. A project by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO, Retrieved on 16 September 2012 from http://www.feedipedia.org/node/4670 Google Scholar
Labroue, F, Guéblez, R, Sellier, P and Meunier-Salaün, MC 1994. Feeding behaviour of group-housed Large White and Landrace pigs in French central test stations. Livestock Production Science 40, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassoudière, A, Frossard, P and Sarah, JL 1978. Le bananier et sa culture en Côte d'Ivoire. Première partie: Connaissance de la plante. Intéraction avec le milieu écologique. Deuxième partie: Techniques culturales. Adaptation aux conditions écologiques de la bananeraie ivoirienne. GERDAT-IRFA, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.Google Scholar
Le Dividich, J and Canope, I 1974. Valeur alimentaire de la farine de banane et de manioc dans le régime du porcelet sevré à 5 semaines: influence du taux de protéines de la ration. Annales de Zootechnie 23, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Dividich, J, Geoffroy, F, Canope, I and Chenost, M 1978. Utilisation des déchets de banane pour l'alimentation du bétail. Revue Mondiale de Zootechnie 20, 22–30.Google Scholar
Le Goff, G and Noblet, J 2001. Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2418–2427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ling, LH, Osman, EM, Fernandes, JB and Reilly, PJ 1982. Physical properties of starch from Cavendish banana fruit. Starch – Stärke 34, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ly, J 2004. Bananas y platanos para alimentar cerdos: aspectos de la composicion quimica de las frutas y de su palatabilidad. Revista Computadorizada de Produccion Porcina 11, 5–24.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Seve, B and Jondreville, C 2002. Valeur nutritive pour le porc. In Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d'élevage (ed. D Sauvant, JM Perez and G Tran), pp. 25–36. INRA-AFZ, Paris.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Shi, XS and Dubois, S 1994. Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliva, F 1970. Evaluacion de la harina de banano verde con cascara, en crecimiento y acabo de cerdos en confinamiento. Thesis PhD, Central University of Equator, Department of Agronomy and Veterinary Medecine, Quito, Equator.Google Scholar
Restrepo, A and Gonzalo, L 1973. Digestibilidad, valor nutritivo y energético del plátano, Musa paradisiaca L., en cerdos. Thesis PhD, Universidade National de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM and Tran, G 2002. Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d'élevage. In Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d'élevage (ed. D Sauvant, JM Perez and G Tran), 301pp. INRA-AFZ, Paris.Google Scholar
Solà-Oriol, D, Roura, E and Torrallardona, D 2009. Feed preference in pigs: Relationship with feed particle size and texture. Journal of Animal Science 87, 571–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, CR 2012. Feed processing to maximize feed efficiency. In Feed efficiency in swine (ed. JF Patience), pp. 131–151. Wageningen Academic Publisher, Wageningen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollier, MT and Robin, JP 1979. Adaptation de la méthode à l’orcinol sulfurique au dosage automatique des glucides neutres totaux: conditions d’application aux extraits d’origine végétale. Annales de Technologies Agricoles 28, 1–15.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ and Wine, RH 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the AOAC 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Wood, JF 1987. The functional properties of feed raw materials and their effect on the production and quality of feed pellets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 18, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, JM, Cai, W and Dekkers, JCM 2011. Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behavior and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 89, 639–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed