Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:29:28.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agriculture in the climate change negotiations; ensuring that food production is not threatened

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2013

J. Muldowney ,
J. Mounsey  and
L. Kinsella
J. Muldowney*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Climate Change and Bioenergy Policy Division, Grattan Business Centre, Portlaoise, Ireland
J. Mounsey
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Climate Change and Bioenergy Policy Division, Grattan Business Centre, Portlaoise, Ireland
L. Kinsella
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Climate Change and Bioenergy Policy Division, Grattan Business Centre, Portlaoise, Ireland
*
†E-mail: John.Muldowney@agriculture.gov.ie
Get access

Abstract

With the human population predicted to reach nine billion by 2050, demand for food is predicted to more than double over this time period, a trend which will lead to increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture. Furthermore, expansion in food production is predicted to occur primarily in the developing world, where adaptation to climate change may be more difficult and opportunities to mitigate emissions limited. In the establishment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ‘ensuring that food production is not threatened’ is explicitly mentioned in the objective of the Convention. However, the focus of negotiations under the Convention has largely been on reducing GHG emissions from energy, and industrial activities and realizing the potential of forestry as a carbon sink. There has been little attention by the UNFCCC to address the challenges and opportunities for the agriculture sector. Since 2006, concerted efforts have been made to raise the prominence of agriculture within the negotiations. The most recent The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report and ‘The Emissions Gap Report’ by the UNEP highlighted the significant mitigation potential of agriculture, which can help contribute towards keeping global temperature rises below the 2°C limit agreed in Cancun. Agriculture has to be a part of the solution to address climate change, but this will also require a focus on how agriculture systems can adapt to climate change in order to continue to increase food output. However, to effectively realize this potential, systematic and dedicated discussion and decisions within the UNFCCC are needed. UNFCCC discussions on a specific agriculture agenda item started in 2012, but are currently inconclusive. However, Parties are generally in agreement on the importance of agriculture in contributing to food security and employment as well as the need to improve understanding of agriculture and how it can contribute to realizing climate objectives. Discussions on agriculture are continuing with a view to finding an acceptable approach to address the climate change related challenges faced by agriculture worldwide and to ensure that ‘food production is not threatened’.

Keywords

agriculturegreenhouse gasesadaptationclimate changefood production
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue s2: Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA 2013), 23rd ‐ 26th June 2013, Dublin, Ireland , June 2013 , pp. 206 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beddington, J, Asaduzzaman, M, Clark, M, Fernandez, A, Guillou, M, Jahn, M, Erda, L, Mamo, T, Van Bo, N, Nobre, CA, Scholes, R, Sharma, R, Wakhungu, J 2012. The role for scientists in tackling food insecurity and climate change. Agriculture & Food Security 2012 1, 10.Google Scholar
Dai, A 2013. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature Climate Change 3, 52–58.Google Scholar
FAO 2012. World agriculture: towards 2030/2050. Interim Report, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
FAO 2006. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
IPCC 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (ed. JT Houghton, Y Ding, DJ Griggs, M Noguer, PJ van der Linden, X Dai, K Maskell and CA Johnson), 881pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
IPCC 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use.Google Scholar
IPCC 2007. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contributions of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva.Google Scholar
Janzen, HH 2004. Carbon cycling in earth systems—a soil science perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104, 399–417.Google Scholar
Jarvis, A, Lau, C, Cook, S, Wollenberg, E, Hansen, J, Bonilla, O, Challinor, A 2011. An integrated adaptation and framework for developing agricultural research: synergies and trade-offs. Experimental Agriculture 47, 185–203.Google Scholar
Kabat, P, Van Schaik, H 2003. Climate changes the water rules: how water managers can cope with today's climate variability and tomorrow's climate change. Dialogue on Water and Climate, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Khan, S, Khan, M, Hanjra, M, Mu, J 2009. Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production. Food Policy 34, 141–149.Google Scholar
Klein, RJT, Huq, S, Denton, F, Downing, TE, Richels, RG, Robinson, JB, Toth, FL 2007. Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation; in climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (ed. ML Parry, OF Canziani, JP Palutikof, PJ van der Linden and CE Hanson), pp. 745–777. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Lybbert, T, Sumner, D 2010. Agricultural technologies for climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing countries: policy options for innovation and technology diffusion, ICTSD–IPC platform on climate change, agriculture and trade, Issue brief no. 6, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland and International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Mosier, AR, Duxbury, JM, Freney, JR, Heinemeyer, O, Minami, K, Johnson, DE 1998. Mitigating agricultural emissions of methane. Climatic Change 40, 39–80.Google Scholar
Oenema, O, Wrage, N, Velthof, GL, van Groenigen, JW, Dolfing, J, Kuikman, PJ 2005. Trends in global nitrous oxide emissions from animal production systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 72, 51–65.Google Scholar
O'Mara, FP 2011. The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 7–15.Google Scholar
Smith, KA, Conen, F 2004. Impacts of land management on fluxes of trace greenhouse gases. Soil Use and Management 20, 255–263.Google Scholar
Smith, P 2004. Engineered biological sinks on land. In The global carbon cycle. Integrating humans, climate, and the natural world (ed. CB Field and MR Raupach), pp. 479–491. SCOPE 62, Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stoorvogel, JJ, Antle, JM, Crissman, CC, Bowen, W 2004. The tradeoff analysis model: Integrated biophysical and economic modelling of agricultural production systems. Agricultural Systems 80, 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tester, M, Langridge, P 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818–822.Google Scholar
Tilman, D, Balzerb, C, Hill, J, Beforta, BL 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings National Academy Science USA 108, 20260–20264.Google Scholar
Topical Forest Group 2011. REDD+ and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): Justification and Recommendations for a New REDD+ Mechanism. Retrieved April 2013, from http://tropicalforestgroup.org/pdf/UNFCCCREDD2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNEP 2011. Bridging the GAP report, A UNEP Synthesis Report. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
UNFCCC 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved December 2012, from http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Adopted at COP 3 in Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
UNFCCC 2006. Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development (In-session Workshop on Climate Change Mitigation). Bonn, Germany. Retrieved December 2012, from http://unfccc.int/files/methods_and_science/mitigation/application/pdf/draft_agenda.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC 2008. Challenges and opportunities for mitigation in the agricultural sector. Technical Paper. FCCC/TP/2008/8. United National Framework Convention on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
UNFCCC 2009. UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen. Retrieved December 2009, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC 2011a. UN Climate Change Conference, Durban. Retrieved November–December 2011, from http://unfccc.int/2860.phpGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC 2011b. Decision 2/CP.17 on the Outcome of Work of Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. Retrieved November–December 2011, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC 2012. Views on Issues Relating to Agriculture. Submissions from Parties. Retrieved November 2012, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2012/sbsta/eng/misc06.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations 2011. World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Highlights and Advance Tables. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ESA/P/WP.220.Google Scholar
Van Beek, CL, Meerburg, BG, Schils, RLM, Verhagen, J, Kuikman, PJ 2010. Feeding the world's increasing population while limiting climate change impacts: linking N2O and CH4 emissions from agriculture to population growth. Environmental Science & Policy 13, 89–96. Retrieved December 2012, from http://www.gscsa2011.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=O0zCD1N9rXY%3D&tabid=3252Google Scholar
Vermeulen, SJ, Aggarwal, PK, Ainslie, A, Angelone, C, Campbell, BM, Challinor, AJ, Hansen, JW, Ingram, JSI, Jarvis, A, Kristjanson, P, Lau, C, Nelson, GC, Thornton, PK, Wollenberg, E 2012. Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change. Environmental Science & Policy 15, 136–144.Google Scholar
World Bank 2012. Turn down the heat: why a 4 degree centigrade warmer world must be avoided. Retrieved November 2012, from http://climatechange.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Turn_Down_the_heat_Why_a_4_degree_centrigrade_warmer_world_must_be_avoided.pdfGoogle Scholar