Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T11:50:00.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

USE of In-Cage Shelters by Laboratory Rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

P Townsend
P Townsend*
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of providing a shelter to single-housed rats was measured in terms of the preference shown for a cage containing a shelter compared with a barren cage, the range of behaviours performed and the apparent fearfulness of the animals. All animals showed a strong preference for cages containing a shelter and rats housed in this environment showed increased exploratory behaviour and were apparently less fearful, based on their willingness to leave the home-cage. It would seem appropriate to provide enclosed shelters within the cages of laboratory rats as a way of improving their environment.

Keywords

animal welfareenrichmenthousingratsshelters
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267Google ScholarPubMed
Anzaldo, A J, Harrison, P C, Riskowski, G L, Sebek, L A, Maghirang, R G, Stricklin, W R and Gonyou, H W 1994 Increasing welfare of laboratory rats with the help of spatially enhanced cages. Animal Welfare Information Centre Newsletter 5(3): 1–5Google Scholar
Batchelor, G R 1994 The rest/activity rhythm of the laboratory rat housed under different systems. Animal Technology 45: 181–187Google Scholar
Boyd, J 1988 Enrichment surprises with mice. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation 3: 98–99Google Scholar
Brain, P F 1995 Rodents. In: O’Donoghue, P N (ed) International Workshop on the Accommodation of Laboratory Animals in Accordance with Animal Welfare Requirements, Berlin 17-19 May 1993 pp 1–14. Bundersministerium fur Erahrung, Landwirtschat und Forster: Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1984 Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals: 2. Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S 1989 Cage design reduces emotionality in mice. Laboratory Animals 23: 215–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe 1986 European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1983 Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological needs. Animal Behaviour 31: 1195–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, M S 1975 The rat’s long-term preference for complexity in its environment. Animal Learning and Behaviour 3: 245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I J H 1978 The interpretation of preference tests in animal behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FELASA Working Group on Animal Health 1994 Recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit breeding colonies. Laboratory Animals 28: 1–12Google Scholar
Grant, E C and Mackintosh, J H 1963 A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. Behaviour 21: 246–259Google Scholar
Home Office 1995 Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals in Designated Breeding and Supplying Establishments. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, M 1984 Behavioural approaches to rodent management. In: Standards in Laboratory Animal Management. Proceedings of a LASA/UFAW Symposium pp 40–49. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services 1985 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, USAGoogle Scholar
Ward, G E and DeMille, D 1991 Environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Animal Technology 42: 149–156Google Scholar