Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T07:45:50.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival of femur fractures in wild stoats (Mustela erminea)

Part of: AWF Wild Animal Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

CM King
CM King*
Affiliation:
Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
*
email: carolyn.king@waikato.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stoats (Mustela erminea) are active hunters and, therefore, one might predict that any broken bones or other injuries impeding active movement would incur a serious risk of starvation. Dead stoats (n = 560) were collected from trappers operating predator control lines in three conservation areas of New Zealand from 1972-1978. Femurs were cleaned and examined for healed injuries and deformities. Five femurs from four stoats (one with both femurs injured) showed traumatic distortions following healing of complete breaks incurred during life. A further case recorded during post-eradication monitoring in 2010 on Rangitoto, an offshore island, is added. These data provide evidence that wild stoats have a remarkable capacity to tolerate catastrophic femur fractures. They can survive long enough, despite the implied limitation to their energetic hunting style, to permit full healing even though the result is a gross distortion of the femoral shaft.

Keywords

animal welfarefracturesMustela ermineastoatvehicle impactswildlife injuries
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 461 - 466
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Argyros, GC and Roth, AJ 2016 Prevalence of healed long-bone fractures in wild carnivores from the north-eastern United States. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 47: 879–882. https://doi.org/10.1638/2015-0180.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockie, RE, Sadleir, R and Linklater, WL 2009 Long-term wildlife road-kill counts in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 36: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014220909510147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C 1981 The effects of two types of steel traps upon captured stoats (Mustela erminea). Journal of Zoology, London 195: 553–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb03487.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C and Forsyth, DM 2021 The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, Third Edition p 538. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
King, CM 1980 Field experiments on the trapping of stoats (Mustela erminea). NZ Journal of Zoology 7: 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1980.10423784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CM 1982 Stoat observations. Landscape (Wellington) 12: 12–15Google Scholar
King, CM 1983 The relationships between beech (Nothofagus spp) seedfall and populations of mice (Mus musculus) and the demo-graphic and dietary responses of stoats (Mustela erminea), in three New Zealand forests. Journal of Animal Ecology 52: 141–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/4593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CM 1991 A review of age determination methods for the stoat Mustela erminea. Mammal Review 21: 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1991.tb00286.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CM and Edgar, RL 1977 Techniques for trapping and tracking stoats (Mustela erminea); a review, and a new system. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 4: 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1977.9517953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CM and Moody, JE 1982 The biology of the stoat (Mustela erminea) in the national parks of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 9: 49–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1982.10423843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CM and Powell, RA 2007 The Natural History of Weasels and Stoats: Ecology, Behavior and Management, Second Edition. Oxford University Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, CM, Veale, A, Patty, B and Hayward, L 2014 Swimming capabilities of stoats and the threat to inshore sanctuaries. Biological Invasions 16: 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0564-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littin, KE 2010 Animal welfare and pest control: meeting both conservation and animal welfare goals. Animal Welfare 19: 171–176Google Scholar
Müller, H 1970 Beiträge zur Biologie des Hermelins, Mustela ermi-nea Linné, 1758. Saugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 18: 293–380. [Title translation: Contributions to the biology of the ermine]Google Scholar
Powell, RA and King, CM 1997 Variation in body size, sexual dimorphism and age-specific survival in stoats, Mustela erminea (Mammalia: Carnivora), with fluctuating food supplies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01621.xGoogle Scholar
Veale, AJ 2013 Observations of stoats (Mustela erminea) swim-ming. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 40: 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2012.716071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veale, AJ, Clout, MN and Gleeson, DM 2012 Genetic population assignment reveals a long-distance incursion to an island by a stoat (Mustela erminea). Biological Invasions 14: 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0113-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B, Poutu, N, Peters, D and Waddington, P 2008 Traps for killing stoats (Mustela erminea): improving welfare per-formance. Animal Welfare 17: 111–116Google Scholar