Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T04:07:54.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Summertime use of natural versus artificial shelter by cattle in nature reserves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2023

E Van laer ,
CPH Moons ,
B Ampe ,
B Sonck ,
J Vangeyte  and
FAM Tuyttens
E Van laer
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheideweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
CPH Moons
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
B Ampe
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheideweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
B Sonck
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheideweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
J Vangeyte
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Burgemeester van Gansberghelaan 115 box 1, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
FAM Tuyttens*
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheideweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: frank.tuyttens@ilvo.vlaanderen.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether cattle grazing in nature reserves in temperate summers ought to be provided with artificial shelter (man-made), in addition to natural shelter (vegetation), is a topic of debate. We have investigated the effect of heat-load on the use of natural versus artificial shelter (with a roof and three walls) by cattle in eight nature reserves in Belgium. GPS collars were used to monitor use of open area, natural and artificial shelter during one or two summers (per 30 min). Cattle location data were coupled to same-time values of climatic ‘heat-stress indices’ calculated from local weather stations’ measurements of air temperature, air humidity, solar radiation and wind speed. Use of open area decreased as heat-load increased. The strength of the effect, and whether the cattle sought natural or artificial shelter, were associated with the amount and spatial distribution of natural shelter in the reserve. When natural shelter was sparse, a more scattered distribution tempered the increased use of shelter with increasing heat-load. If sufficiently available, cattle preferred natural to artificial shelter. When little natural shelter was available, cattle did use the artificial shelter and especially so with increasing heat-load. Microclimatic measurements indicated that solar radiation was blocked by vegetation at least as well as by artificial shelter, and allowed more evaporative cooling. In conclusion, we found no evidence for the added value of additional artificial shelter to protect cattle from heat-load in temperate nature reserves, as long as adequate natural shelter is available.

Keywords

animal welfareartificial sheltercattlenature conservationtemperate climatevegetation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 345 - 356
Copyright
© 2015 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andresen, H, Bakker, JP, Brongers, M, Heydemann, B and Irmler, U 1990 Long-term changes of salt marsh communities by cattle grazing. Vegetatio 89: 137–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00032166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, M 2004 Mechanisms of decision-making and the inter-pretation of choice tests. Animal Welfare 13: 115–120Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, TM, Eigenberg, RA and Nienaber, JA 2006 Heat stress risk factors of feedlot heifers. Livestock Science 105:57–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.025Google Scholar
Clarke, MR and Kelly, AM 1996 Some effects of shade on Hereford steers in a feedlot. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 21: 235–238Google Scholar
Finch, VA, Bennett, IL and Holmes, CR 1984 Coat colour in cattle: effect on thermal balance, behaviour and growth, and relationship with coat type. Journal of Agricultural Science 102: 141–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600041575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamborg, C, Gremmen, B, Christiansen, SB and Sandøe, P 2010 De-domestication: ethics at the intersection of landscape restoration and animal welfare. Environmental Values 19: 57–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327110X485383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaughan, JB, Goodwin, PJ, Schoorl, TA, Young, BA, Imbeah, M, Mader, TL and Hall, A 1998 Shade preferences of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38: 17–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA97039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaughan, JB, Mader, TL, Holt, SM and Lisle, A 2008 A new heat load index for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86: 226–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T, Odde, KG, Schutz, DN and Behrns, LM 1994 The reluctance of cattle to change a learned choice may confound preference tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90012-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graunke, KL, Schuster, T and Lidfors, LM 2011 Influence of weather on the behaviour of outdoor-wintered beef cattle in Scandinavia. Livestock Science 136: 247–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, GL, Mader, TL and Eigenberg, RA 2003 Perspective on development of thermal indices for animal studies and manage-ment. In: Lacetera, N, Bernabucci, U, Khalifa, HH, Ronchi, B and Nardone, A (eds) Interactions Between Climate and Animal Production pp 31–44. Wageningen Academic Publishers: The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Hauck, M and Popp, A 2010 The effects of cattle browsing on woody vegetation in large-scale pastures of the Thuringian Rhoen and the South Black Forest. In: Plachter, H and Hampicke, U (eds) Large-Scale Livestock Grazing, A Management Tool for Nature Conservation pp 128–143. Springer-Verlag: GermanyGoogle Scholar
Kluever, BM, Breck, SW, Howery, LD, Krausman, PR and Bergman, DL 2008 Vigilance in cattle: the influence of predation, social interactions, and environmental factors. Rangeland Ecology & Management 61: 321–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2111/07-087.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, J and Driessen, C 2013 Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle. Geoforum 48:249–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mader, TL, Dahlquist, JM, Hahn, G and Gaughan, JB 1999 Shade and wind barrier effects on summertime feedlot cattle per-formance. Journal of Animal Science 77: 2065–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mader, TL, Davis, MS and Brown-Brandl, T 2006 Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84: 712–719CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mader, TL, Johnson, LJ and Gaughan, JB 2010 A comprehensive index for assessing environmental stress in animals. Journal of Animal Science 88: 2153–2165. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magurran, AE 1988 Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press: UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosselle, L, Permentier, L, Verbeke, G, Driessen, B and Geers, R 2013 Interactions between climatological variables and sheltering behavior of pastoral beef cattle during sunny weather in a temperate climate. Journal of Animal Science 91: 943–949. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamouris, M 2001 Heat island effect. In: Santamouris, M (ed) Energy and Climate in the Urban Built Environment. James & James: UKGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N 2000 Effects of heat stress on the welfare of exten-sively managed domestic ruminants. Livestock Production Science 67: 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00162-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröter, RC, Marlin, DJ and Jeffcott, LB 1996 Use of the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) Index to quantify environmental heat loads during three-day-event competitions. Equine Veterinary Journal 28:3–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1 996.tb05025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shashua-Bar, L and Hoffman, ME 2000 Vegetation as a climat-ic component in the design of an urban street: An empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees. Energy and Buildings 31: 221–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3Google Scholar
Senft, RL, Coughenour, MB, Bailey, DW, Rittenhouse, LR, Sala, OE and Swift, DM 1987 Large herbivore foraging and eco-logical hierarchies. Bioscience 37: 789–799. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1310545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuth, JW 1991 Foraging behaviour. In: Heitschmidt, RK and Stuth, JW (eds) Grazing Management: An Ecological Approach pp 65–83. Timber Press Inc: Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
Thom, EC 1959 The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12: 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van laer, E, Ampe, B, Moons, CPH, Sonck, B and Tuyttens, FAM 2015 Wintertime use of natural versus artificial shelter by cattle in nature reserves in temperate areas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 163: 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van laer, E, Moons, CPH, Sonck, B and Tuyttens, FAM 2014 Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates. Livestock Science 159: 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, FWM 2000 Grazing Ecology and Forest History. CABI Publishing: UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851994420.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis de Vries, MF 1994 Foraging in a landscape mosaic: diet selection and performance of free-ranging cattle in heathland and riverine grass-land. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Welp, T, Rushen, J, Kramer, DL, Festa-Bianchet, M and de Passillé, AM 2004 Vigilance as a measure of fear in dairy cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.12.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, NTM 1955 Photoperiodicity in cattle I. Seasonal changes in coat character and their importance in heat regulation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 891–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9550891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbelman, RB, Rhoads, RP, Rhoads, ML, Duff, GC, Baumgard, LH and Collier, RJ 2009 A re-evaluation of the impact of temperature humidity index (THI) and black globe humidity index (BGHI) on milk production in high producing dairy cows. In: Collier, RJ (ed) Proceedings of the Southwest Nutrition and Management Conference pp 158–169. 26-27 February 2009, Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Van laer et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 3.8 MB
Supplementary material: File

Van laer et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 88.4 KB