Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:36:22.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of welfare in cattle, sheep and pig lairages, with emphasis on stocking rates, ventilation and noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

CA Weeks
CA Weeks*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
*
email: claire.weeks@bristol.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Appropriate space allowances for animals are yet to be specifically determined for lairage. Space allowances that may be suitable for animals in lairage are suggested, based on reviewed studies of animals in transport, lairage and on farm. The longer animals are in lairage the more space they require, in order to be able to get up and lie down and lie undisturbed by congeners. Little work has been done on air quality and air flow characteristics in lairages. The range of ventilation must be sufficient to control levels of toxic or irritant gases such as carbon dioxide and ammonia and to remove excess heat and humidity; the latter being particularly relevant for pig lairages in hot weather. Intensities of sound measured in lairages often exceed 85 dB and there is evidence to suggest that such levels can be stressful especially for pigs; and human shouting appears particularly aversive to animals. Cattle vocalise in response to painful stimuli and to convey information to conspecifics that may be related to fear and distress. There is limited evidence that sheep adapt to continuous sound, provided it is not too loud, but respond to intermittent sounds such as gates banging and human shouting. Vocal communication between sheep may be less important than that between cattle and pigs. Levels of vocalisation are potential indices of animal welfare. Animals' prior experiences and factors such as sex, group size and constitution, pen design, and climatic or environmental conditions affect their welfare and responses to conditions in lairage.

Keywords

animal welfarecattlelairagenoisepigssheep
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 275 - 284
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, JL and Arave, CW 1997 The Behaviour of Cattle. CAB International: Wallingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algers, B, Ekesbo, I and Stromberg, S 1978a Impact of continuous noise on animal health. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica S67: 5-26Google Scholar
Algers, B, Ekesbo, I and Stromberg, S 1978b Noise measurements in farm animal environments. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica S68: 3-19Google Scholar
Algers, B and Jensen, P 1985 Communication during suckling in the domestic pig; effects of continuous noise. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algers, B and Jensen, P 1991 Teat stimulation and milk production during early lactation in sows: effects of continuous noise. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, DR and Arehart, LA 1972 Physiological responses of lambs to auditory stimuli. Journal of Animal Science 34: 994–998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton Gade, P, Blaabjerg, L and Christensen, L 1993 New lairage system for slaughter pigs: effect on behaviour and slaughter characteristics. Meat Focus International 2: 115–118Google Scholar
Boe, KE, Berg, SN and Andersen, IL 2006 Resting behaviour and displacements in ewes: effects of reduced lying space and pen shape. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, G 1986 Housing the Pig. Farming Press Ltd: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
British Standard 5502 1990 Buildings and Structures for Agriculture. Part 40: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Cattle Buildings. British Standards Institute: London, UK. In: Wathes, CM and Charles, DRC (eds) Livestock Housing. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Brown, SN, Knowles, TG, Edwards, JE and Warriss, PD 1999a Relationship between food deprivation before transport and aggression in pigs held in lairage before slaughter. Veterinary Record 145: 630–634CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, SN, Knowles, TG, Edwards, JE and Warriss, PD 1999b Behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to being transported for up to 24 hours followed by six hours of recovery in lairage. Veterinary Record 145: 421–426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, DRC 1994 Comparative climatic requirements. In: Wathes, CM and Charles, DRC (eds) Livestock Housing. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Cockram, MS, Kent, JE, Goddard, PJ, Waran, NK, McGilp, IM, Jackson, RE, Muwanga, GM and Prytherch, S 1996 Effect of space allowance during transport on the behavioural and physiological responses of lambs during and after transport. Animal Science 62: 461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defra 2003a Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock Sheep. Defra Publications, Admail 6000: London SW1A 2XX, UKGoogle Scholar
Defra 2003b Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock Pigs. Defra Publications, Admail 6000: London SW1A 2XX, UKGoogle Scholar
Delpietro, HA 1989 Case reports on defensive behaviour in equine and bovine subjects in response to vocalization of the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, SM, Pauwels, H, Debie, S, Demeyer, DI, Calleweir, J and Eeckout, W 1996 Effect of halothane genotype, breed, feed withdrawal, and lairage on pork quality of Belgian slaughter pigs. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1854–1863CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabrega, E, Coma, J, Tibau, J, Manteca, X and Velarde, A 2007 Evaluation of parameters for monitoring welfare during transport and lairage at the abattoir in pigs. Animal Welfare 16: 201–204Google Scholar
FAWC 2003 Report on the Welfare of Farmed Animals at Slaughter or Killing. Part 1: Red Meat Animals. FAWC: 1A Page Street, London SW1P 4PQ, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraqueza, MJ, Roseiro, LC, Almeida, J, Matias, E, Santos, C and Randall, JM 1998 Effects of lairage temperature and holding time on pig behaviour and on carcass and meat quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, AF and Broom, DM 1998 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Bailliere-Tindall and Cassell: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Geverink, NA, Engel, B, Lambooij, E and Wiegant, VM 1996 Handling of slaughter pigs in lairage: behavioural and physiological effects. Proceedings of the EU seminar New Information on Welfare and Meat Quality of Pigs as Related to Handling, Transport and Lairage Conditions pp 207-212. June 29-30 1995, Landbauforschung, Völkenrode, Sonderheft 166, Mariensee, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Geverink, NA, Buhnemann, A, van de Burgwal, JA, Lambooij, E, Blokhuis, HJ and Wiegant, VM 1998 Responses of slaughter pigs to transport and lairage sounds. Physiology & Behavior 63(4): 667–673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonyou, HW 2001 The social behaviour of pigs. In: Keeling, LJ and Gonyou, HW (eds) Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1990 Design of loading facilities and holding pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 2001 Cattle vocalisations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 191–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groot Koerkamp, PWG, Metz, JHM, Uenk, GH, Phillips, VR, Holden, MR, Sneath, RW, Short, JL, White, RP, Hartung, J, Seedorf, J, Schröder, M, Linkert, KH, Pedersen, S, Takai, H, Johnsen, JO and Wathes, CM 1998 Concentrations and emissions of ammonia in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 70: 79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guardia, MD, Estany, J, Balasasch, S, Oliver, MA, Gispert, M and Diestre, A 2004 Risk assessment of PSE condition due to preslaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Science 67: 471–478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S, Earley, B and Crowe, MA 2007 Pituitary, adrenal, immune and performance responses of mature Holstein × Friesian bulls housed on slatted floors at various space allowances. Veterinary Journal 173: 594–604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gygax, L, Siegwart, R and Wechsler, B 2007 Effects of space allowance on the behaviour and cleanliness of finishing bulls kept in pens with fully slatted rubber coated flooring. Applied Animal behaviour Science 107: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, SJG, Kirkpatrick, SM, Lloyd, DM and Broom, DM 1998 Noise and vehicular motion as potential stressors during the transport of sheep. Animal Science 67: 467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffner, RS and Heffner, HE 1992 Auditory perception. In: Phillips C and Piggins D(eds) Farm Animals and the Environment. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Houpt, K 1998 Domestic Animal Behavior for Veterinarians and Animal Scientists. Iowa State University Press: Ames, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, AM, Harrington, DWJ and Cockram, MS 1996 Effect of source and lairage on some behavioural and biochemical measurements of feed restriction and dehydration in cattle at a slaughterhouse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50: 83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanitz, E, Otten, W and Tuchscherer, M 2005 Central and peripheral effects of repeated noise stress on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in pigs. Livestock Production Science 94: 213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, JE 1997 Stress in transported sheep. Comparative Haematology International 7: 163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiley, M 1972 The vocalizations of ungulates, their causation and function. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 31: 171–222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, FB, Jackson, RE, Gordon, GDH and Cockram, MS 1994 Resting behaviour of sheep in a slaughterhouse lairage. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, DH, Woo, JH and Lee, CY 2004 Effects of stocking density and transportation time of market pigs in their behaviour, plasma concentrations of glucose and stress-associated enzymes and carcass quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 17: 116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, TG 1998 A review of the road transport of slaughter sheep. Veterinary Record 143: 212–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, TG, Brown, SN, Edwards, JE and Warriss, PD 1998 A minimum ambient temperature below which pigs should not be continuously showered in lairage. Veterinary Record 143: 575–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooij, E 2000 Transport of pigs. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Lambooy, E, Garssen, GJ, Walstra, P, Mateman, G and Merkus, GSM 1985 Transport of pigs by car for 2 days: some aspects of watering and load density. Livestock Production Science 13: 289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, JL, Grandin, T, Green, RD, Avery, D and McGee, K 2000 The relationship between reaction to sudden intermittent movements and sounds and temperament. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1467–1474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, NG 1994 Beef Cattle Housing In: Wathes CM and Charles DRC (eds) Livestock Housing. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Loynes, IJ 1983 Housing Sheep. Farm Buildings Information Centre: Stoneleigh, UK. In: Wathes, CM and Charles, DRC (eds) Livestock Housing. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
McBride, G, James, JW and Hodgens, N 1964 Social behaviour of domestic animals IV: Growing pigs. Animal Production 6: 129–139Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission 1974 Guidelines for Export Slaughterhouses Technical Bulletin No. 13. Meat and Livestock Commission: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
Moss, BW 1978 Some observations on the activity and aggressive behaviour of pigs when penned prior to slaughter. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajor, EA, Rushen, J and de Pasille, AM 1999 Aversion learning techniques to evaluate dairy cow handling practices. Journal of Animal Science 77(1): 149Google Scholar
Perdomo, CC, Fernandes, LCDO, Guidoni, AL and Fialho, FB 1999 Effect of natural and mechanical ventilation on performance of lactation sows. Persquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 34: 691–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, CJC 1993 Cattle Behaviour. Farming Press Books: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
Plyashchenko, SI and Sidorov, VT 1984 Effects of production noises on the state of health, productivity and behaviour of cows. Soviet Agricultural Science (USA) 5: 51–54Google Scholar
Rabaste, C, Faucitano, L, Saucier, L, Mormede, P, Correa, JA, Giguere, A and Bergeron, R 2007 The effects of handling and group size on welfare of pigs in lairage and their influence on stomach weight, carcass microbial contamination and meat quality. Canadian Journal of Meat Science 87: 3–12Google Scholar
Randall, JM 1993 Environmental parameters necessary to define comfort for pigs, cattle and sheep in livestock transporters. Animal Production 57: 299–307Google Scholar
Randall, JM and Boon, CR 1994 Ventilation and control. In: Wathes, CM and Charles, DRC (eds) Livestock Housing. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL and Manteca, X 1999 Behavioural effects of social mixing at different stocking densities in prepubertal lambs. Animal Welfare 8(2): 117–126Google Scholar
Santos, C, Almeida, JM, Matias, EC, Fraqueza, MJ, Roseiro, C and Sardinia, L 1997 Influence of lairage environmental conditions and resting time on meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 45: 253–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCAHAW 2002 Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare: The Welfare of Animals During Transport (Details for Horses, Pigs, Sheep and Cattle). European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General. Report adopted on 11th March 2002. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scah/out71_en.pdf (accessed 24/4/2008)Google Scholar
Schmolke, SA, Li, YZ and Gonyou, HW 2003 Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81: 874–878CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schon, PC, Puppe, B and Manteuffel, G 2004 Automated recording of stress vocalisations as a tool to document impaired welfare in pigs. Animal Welfare 13: 105–110Google Scholar
Seedorf, J, Hartung, J, Schröder, M, Linkert, KH, Pedersen, S, Takai, H, Johnsen, JO, Metz, JHM, Groot Koerkamp, PWG, Uenk, HG, Phillips, VR, Holden, MR, Sneath, RW, Short, JL, White, RP and Wathes, CM 1998 A Survey of Ventilation Rates in Livestock Buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research: 70: 39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AT 1994 Pig Housing. In: Wathes, CM and Charles, DRC (eds) Livestock Housing. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Symoens, J and van den Brande, M 1969 Prevention and cure of aggressiveness in pigs using the sedative azaperone. Veterinary Record 85: 64–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talling, JC, Waran, NK and Wathes, CM 1996 Behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to sound. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talling, JC, Waran, NK, Wathes, CM and Lines, JA 1998a Sound avoidance by domestic pigs depends upon characteristics of the signal. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talling, JC, Lines, JA, Wathes, CM and Waran, NK 1998b The acoustic environment of the domestic pig. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 71: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, PV 1993 An overview of production, slaughter and processing factors that affect pork quality: general review. In: Puolanne, E and Demeyer, DI (eds) Pork Quality: Genetic and Metabolic Factors. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Turner, SP, Ewen, M, Rooke, JA and Edwards, SA 2000 The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes. Livestock Production Science 66: 47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieuille-Thomas, C and Signoret, JP 1992 Pheromonal transmission of an aversive experience in domestic pigs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 1551–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Edwards, JE, Anil, MH and Fordham, DP 1992 The time in lairage needed by pigs to recover from the stress of transport. Veterinary Record 131: 194–196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD 1994 Handling pigs immediately preslaughter: practical concerns and considerations for welfare and meat quality. Meat Focus International 3: 167–171Google Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Nute, GR, Knowles, TG, Edwards, JE, Perry, AM and Johnson, SP 1995 Potential interactions between the effects of preslaughter stress and postmortem electrical-stimulation of the carcass on meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 41: 55–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD 1996 The consequences of fighting between mixed groups of unfamiliar pigs before slaughter. Meat Focus International 5: 89–93Google Scholar
Warriss, PD 1998 Choosing appropriate space allowances for slaughter pigs transported by road: a review. Veterinary Record 142: 449–454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Edwards, JE and Knowles, TG 1998 Effect of lairage time on levels of stress and meat quality in pigs. Animal Science 66: 255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD 2003 Optimal lairage times and conditions for slaughter pigs: a review. Veterinary Record 153: 170–176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN and Knowles, TG 2003 Assessment of possible methods for estimating the stocking density of sheep being carried on commercial vehicles. Veterinary Record 150: 233–236Google Scholar
Wathes, CM, Jones, CDM and Webster, AJF 1983 Ventilation, air hygiene and animal health. Veterinary Record 113: 554–559Google ScholarPubMed
Wathes, CM, Jones, JB, Kristensen, HH, Jones, EKM and Webster, AJF 2002 Aversion of pigs and domestic fowl to atmospheric ammonia. Transactions of the ASAE 45: 1605–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 1999 Effects of restraint and branding on rates and acoustic parameters of vocalization in beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 2000 Vocal behaviour in cattle: the animal's commentary on its biological processes and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 15–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waynert, DF, Stookey, JM, Swartzkopf-Genwein, KS, Watts, JM and Waltz, CS 1999 Responses of beef cattle to noise during handling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM, Braithwaite, LA and Fraser, D 1998 Vocal response to pain in piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, AJF 1983 Nutrition and the thermal environment. In: Rook, JAF and Thomas, PC (eds) Nutritional Physiology of Farm Animals. Longman: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Weeks, CA, Brown, SN, Lane, S, Heasman, L, Benson, T and Warriss, PD 2008a Lairage Report. http://www.defra.gov.uk/science/Project_Data/DocumentLibrary/MH0132/MH1032_5725_FRA.docGoogle Scholar
Weeks, CA, Brown, SN, Lane, S, Heasman, L, Benson, T and Warriss, PD 2008b Noise levels in UK cattle, sheep and pig lairages. Submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
Winfield, CG, Syme, GJ and Pearson, AJ 1981 Effect of familiarity with each other and breed on the spatial behaviour of sheep in an open field. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar