Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T02:52:48.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimally Invasive Health Monitoring of Wildlife

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J E Cooper
J E Cooper*
Affiliation:
Centre Vétérinaire des Volcans, BP 105, Ruhengeri, Rwanda, Central Africa
*
*Present address: Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), Department of Biosciences, The University, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigations of free-living wild animals often involve capture, restraint or other forms of manipulation. There is a need, on both scientific and welfare grounds, to develop and to use less invasive techniques, especially for the assessment of health. Already some such procedures exist, ranging from observation of clinical signs to the laboratory examination and analysis of faeces and other naturally voided samples.

Minimally invasive and non-invasive health monitoring of vertebrate animals is outlined and examples are given of samples from mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish that can provide useful information.

Keywords

animal welfarewildlifehealth monitoringvertebrates
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 35 - 44
Copyright
© 1998 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Ornithologists’ Union 1988 Report of committee on use of wild birds in research. Auk: 1A-41AGoogle Scholar
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, the Herpetologists League and the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 1987 Guidelines for the use of live amphibians and reptiles in field research. Journal of Herpetology 4: 1–14Google Scholar
British Wildlife Rehabilitation Council 1989 Ethics and Legal Aspects of Treatment and Rehabilitation of Wild Animal Casualties. BWRC: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Burrows, R, Hofer, H, and East, M L 1994 Demography, extinction and intervention in a small population: the case of the Serengeti wild dogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B256: 281–292Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1984 Wild vertebrates in the field and in the laboratory. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Volume 2, ppl91-200. CCAC: Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Carss, D N and Parkinson, S G 1996 Errors associated with otter (Lutra lutra) faecal analysis. I. Assessing general diet from spraints. Journal of Zoology 238: 301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J E 1989 (ed) Disease and Threatened Birds. Technical Publication No 10. International Council for Bird Preservation (Birdlife International): Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J E 1990 A tenderness towards all creatures: paradoxes and portents in wildlife rehabilitation. Proceedings of the International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council Conference: Beyond the bird in the hand, pp 4–10. International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council: Suisan, California, USAGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J E and Williams, D L 1995 Veterinary perspectives and techniques in husbandry and research. In: Warwick, C, Frye, F L and Murphy, J B (eds) Health and Welfare of Captive Reptiles, pp 98–112. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M E 1987 An Introduction to Animal Law. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M J 1992 (ed) Natural enemies. The Population Biology of Predators, Parasites and Diseases. Blackwell Scientific Publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Dein, F J 1991 Standards for free-ranging wildlife. Proceedings American Association of Zoo Veterinarians 1991. American Association of Zoo Veterinarians: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, E J and Rosovsky, J 1993 The ethics of ecological field experimentation. Conservation Biology 7: 463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossey, D 1983 Gorillas in the Mist. Houghton Mifflin: Mass, USAGoogle Scholar
Foster, J W 1993 Health plan for the mountain gorillas of Rwanda. In: Fowler, M E (ed) Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, pp 331–334. W B Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M E 1986 (ed) Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine. W B Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Franzmann, A W 1993 Veterinary contributions to international wildlife management. In: Fowler, M E (ed) Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, pp 42–44. W B Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Graham, L H, Goodrowe, K L, Raeside, J I and Liptrap, R M 1995 Non-invasive monitoring of ovarian function in several felid species by measurement of fecal estradiol-17B and progestins. Zoo Biology 14: 223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J B S 1959 The non-violent scientific study of birds. In: Daniel, J S (ed) A Century of Natural History, pp 417–425. Bombay Natural History Society/Oxford University Press (1983): Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Henry, C J and Meeker, D L 1981 An evaluation of blood plasma for monitoring DDE in birds of prey. Environmental Pollution (Series A) 25: 291–304Google Scholar
Kirkwood, J K 1993 Interventions for wildlife health, conservation and welfare. Veterinary Record 132: 235–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, J K 1994 Veterinary education for wildlife conservation, health and welfare. Veterinary Record 135: 148–151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, M 1968 Be a Nature Detective. Warne: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Larsson, P and Lindegren, A 1987 Animals need not be killed to reveal their body-burdens of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Environmental Pollution 45: 73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larter, N C, Rajamahendran, R and Sivakumaran, K 1994 Immunoreactive faecal progestins as indicators of reproductive status. Veterinary Record 134: 474–475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loye, J E and Zuk, M 1991 (eds) Bird - Parasite Interactions. Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
McGee, E J, Symott, H J, O’Keefe, C and Colgan, P A 1995 Radionuclide uptake by red deer (Cervus elaphus) on mountain grazing. British Veterinary Journal 151: 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, D J, Anderson, E, Foggin, C M, Kock, M D and Tiran, E P 1995 Plasma Cortisol as an indicator of stress due to capture and translocation in wildlife species. Veterinary Record 136: 60–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Needham, C S, Lillywhite, J E, Beasley, NMR, Didier, J M, Kihamia, C M and Bundy, DAP 1996 Potential for diagnosis of intestinal infections through antibody detection in saliva. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90: 526–530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peakall, D B 1987 Toxicology. In: Pendleton, BAG, Millsap, B A, Cline, K W and Bird, D M (eds) Raptor Management Techniques, pp 321–329. National Wildlife Federation: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Threlfall, W 1989 Use and abuse of wildlife in research. Bio-Ethics ‘89 Report of the Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Control of the Use of Animals in Scientific Research, pp 155–167. Animal Welfare Foundation: CanadaGoogle Scholar
Young, S, Macdonald, D and Linzey, A 1996 Study and be damned? BBC Wildlife 14(1): 64–67Google Scholar