Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T12:30:56.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of olfactory substances on the heart rate and lying behaviour of pigs during transport simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B Driessen*
Affiliation:
Katholieke Hogeschool Kempen, Kleinhoefstraat 4, B-2440 Geel, Belgium Laboratory for Quality Care in Animal Production, Zootechnical Centre, KU Leuven, Bijzondere weg 12, B-3360 Lovenjoel, Belgium
E Peeters
Affiliation:
Federal Government Service, Department Animal Welfare, Victor Hortaplein 40/10, B-1060 Brussels, Belgium
R Geers
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Quality Care in Animal Production, Zootechnical Centre, KU Leuven, Bijzondere weg 12, B-3360 Lovenjoel, Belgium
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Bert.Driessen@khk.be

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of olfactory substances on the heart rate and lying behaviour of pigs during transport simulation. Five treatments were tested through the application of each substance to pigs’ snouts with a paintbrush. These consisted of: 1) control treatment (wiping without product); 2) 2 ml of a synthetic, maternal-like pheromone; 3) 5 ml of a synthetic, maternal-like pheromone; 4) a commercial, non-relevant odour and 5) 2 ml of a placebo (solvent of the synthetic pheromone without active ingredients). In total, 90 pigs took part in this study and each treatment was tested on a group of three pigs with six replicates per treatment. Pigs were vibrated in the vertical direction in a transport simulator with a frequency of 8 Hz and an acceleration of 3 m s−2. Cardiac activity and lying behaviour during vibration were quantified. The effect of vibration was found to be statistically significant, ie causing an increase in heart rate and numbers of ventricular ectopic beats (VEB). Both 2 and 5 ml of synthetic pheromone were generally found to decrease the minimum, mean, and peak heart rate values in comparison with the other treatments (in particular the control and the non-relevant odour group) but only minimum heart rate reached statistical significance. However, the number of VEBs was highest for these two synthetic pheromone groups during vibration. No dose-dependent synthetic pheromone effects were found and there were no differences in the amount of time pigs spent lying. The use of olfactory substances may support pigs’ ability to cope with real transport conditions thereby improving their welfare.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, IL, Andenaes, H, Boe, KE, Jensen, P and Bakken, M 2000 The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 107120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, SA 1963 A Study in Behaviour. Methuen & Co: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Barrows, EM 1995 Animal Behavior Desk Reference. CRC Press Inc: Boca Raton, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Birch, MC 1974 Introduction. In: Pheromones pp 17. North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Cowley, JJ and Wise, DR 1970 Pheromones, Growth and Behaviour. In: Porter, R and Birch, J (eds) Chemical Influences on Behaviour pp 144170. CIBA Foundation Study Group: Churchill, London, UKGoogle Scholar
Dantzer, R and Mormède, P 1983 Stress in farm-animals - a need for re-evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 57: 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, B, Peeters, E, van de Water, G and Geers, R 2002 Influence of olfactory substances on growth performance, carcass damage and meat quality of pigs. In: van der Honing Y (ed) Book of Abstracts of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production pp 150. 1-4 September 2002, Cairo, Egypt: Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Ellestad, MH 1987 Stress Testing: Principles and Practice, Third Edition. FA Davis Company: Philadelphia, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
Geers, R, Bleus, E, van Schie, T, Villé, H, Gerard, H, Janssens, S, Nackaerts, G, Decuypere, E and Jourquin, J 1994 Transport of pigs different with respect to the halothane gene: stress assessment. Journal of Animal Science 72: 25522558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geers, R, Parduyns, G, Goedseels, V, Bosschaerts, L and De Ley, J 1990 Skeletal muscularity and heart function in growing piglets. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 21: 231236Google ScholarPubMed
Karlson, P and Lüscher, M 1959 ‘Pheromones’: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183: 5556CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambooij, E 1988 Road transport of pigs over a long distance: Some aspects of behaviour, temperature and humidity during transport and some effect of the last two factors. Animal Production 46: 257263Google Scholar
Lambooij, E and van Putten, G 1993 Transport of pigs. In: Grandin T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport pp 213-23 1. CABI: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Mayes, H and Jesse, G 1988 Activity effects on the heart rate of feeder pigs. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 4: 156158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, JJ and Anderson, DL 2002 Synthetic maternal pheromone stimulates feeding behavior and weight gain in weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80: 3 179-3 183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, JJ, Curtis, SE and Banks, EM 1987 Evidence for aggression modulating pheromones in prepuberal pigs. Behavioral and Neural Biology 47: 2739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, M, Salmon, P, Steinberg, H, Sykers, EA, Bouloux, P, Newbould, E, McLoughlin, L, Bessers, GM and Grossman, A 1990 Endogenous opioids modulate the cardiovascular response to mental stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 15: 185192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OJEU 1986 Council Directive 86/64/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L 358: 0001 -0028Google Scholar
Pageat, P and Teissier, Y 1998 Can a pig pheromone analogue improve daily weight gain and food conversion efficiency post-weaning? Proceedings of the 15th IPVS Congress pp 413. 5-9 July 1998, Birmingham, UK: University Press: Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Peeters, E, Neyt, A, Beckers, F, de Smet, S, Aubert, AE and Geers, R 2005 Influence of supplemental magnesium, tryptophan, vitamin C, and vitamin E on stress responses of pigs to vibration. Journal of Animal Science 83: 15681580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perremans, S 1999 Physiological and ethological responses of pigs during simulation of transport. Acta Biomedica Lovaniensia No. 201. University Press: Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Perremans, S, Randall, J, Rombouts, G, Duchateau, W, Villé, H and Geers, R 1997 Welfare monitoring of pigs in relation to transport. In: Bottcher, RW and Hoff, SJ (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Livestock Environment pp 138145. 29-31 May 1997, Bloomington, Minnesota. ASAE: Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
Perremans, S, Randall, JM, Allegaert, L, Stiles, MA, Rombouts, G and Geers, R 1998 Influence of vertical vibration on heart rate of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76: 416420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petherick, JC and Blackshaw, JK 1987 A review of the factors influencing the aggressive and agonistic behaviour of the domestic pig. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27: 605611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, JM, Stiles, MA, Geers, R, Schütte, A, Christensen, L and Bradshaw, RH 1995 Transport of pigs: vibration and discomfort. In: Proceedings of the United Kingdom Informal Group Meeting on Human Response to Vibration. 18-20 September 1995, Silsoe, UK. Silsoe Research Institute: Silsoe, Bedford, UKGoogle Scholar
Serfling, RJ 1980 Transformations of Given Statistics. In: Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics, First Edition pp 117137. John Wiley and Sons: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirindelli, R, Mucignat-Caretta, C and Ryba, NJP 1998 Molecular aspects of pheromonal communication via the vomeronasal organ of mammals. Trends in Neurosciences 11: 482486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Putten, G and Elshof, WJ 1978 Observations on the effect of transport on the well being and lean quality of slaughter pigs. Animal Regulations Studies 1: 247271Google Scholar
Villé, H, Bertels, S, Geers, R, Janssens, S, Goedseels, V, Parduyns, G, van Bael, J, Goossens, K, Bosschaerts, L, de Ley, J and Heylen, L 1993 Electrocardiogram parameters of pigs during housing, handling, and transport. Animal Production 56: 21 1216Google Scholar