Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:22:36.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incidence of dog bites and public attitudes towards dog care and management in Samoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MJ Farnworth ,
KA Blaszak ,
EF Hiby  and
NK Waran
MJ Farnworth*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare and Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Natural Sciences, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, Private Bag 92025
KA Blaszak
Affiliation:
World Society for the Protection of Animals, 222 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB
EF Hiby
Affiliation:
World Society for the Protection of Animals, 222 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB
NK Waran
Affiliation:
Jeanne Marchig International Centre for Animal Welfare Education, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: mfarnworth@unitec.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many developing nations, dogs (Canis familiaris) present a significant issue in terms of human health, safety and animal welfare. We assessed attitudes towards dogs and their management in Samoa, a developing South Pacific island nation, using a questionnaire. It demonstrated that Samoa has one of the world's highest recorded levels of household dog ownership (88%) but a comparatively low rate of vaccination (12%) and sterilisation (19%). Those interviewed believe dogs were important and should be considered part of the family; however most households reported that their dogs were kept for protection (79%). There was a clear skew in the sex distribution. The dog population showed a strong male bias (71%) suggesting females are removed from the population. Of those surveyed only 16% had received any education about dogs and their management and overall the respondents showed a clear disparity between attitudes and behaviour (eg the majority believe dogs should be vaccinated [81%] yet most dogs in this sample [72%] had never been to a veterinarian). Overall, there was a willingness to manage the free-roaming dog population which was considered by many to be a nuisance, however there were few enforceable mechanisms by which this could occur and most dogs were not confined. Harm or killing of dogs was relatively commonplace with 30% of households reporting they knew someone who had harmed or killed a dog and 26% of respondents indicating they believed harming or killing dogs was good for Samoan society, presumably by reducing problems associated with the free-roaming population. Dog bites were relatively frequent in Samoa and reports from two hospitals indicated a frequency of 37 new bites per annum requiring hospitalisation per 10,000 head of population. Furthermore, this paper outlines strategies and further research that could be considered to improve dog welfare and reduce the need to harm or kill dogs, namely improvements in veterinary provision and dog-focused education. It also considers the need for legislative controls and more research and funding to be made available for small developing nations to explore their animal welfare obligations.

Keywords

animal welfarebitedogfree-roamingmanagementpopulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 477 - 486
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta-Jamett, G, Cleaveland, S, Cunningham, AA and Bronsvoort BM de, C 2010 Demography of domestic dogs in rural and urban areas of the Coquimbo region of Chile and implications for disease transmission. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 94: 272–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alie, K, Davis, BW, Fielding, WJ and Galindo Maldonaldo, F 2007 Attitudes towards dogs and other ‘pets’ in Roseau, Dominica. Anthrozoös 20: 143–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303707X207936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A 2009 The rat and the octopus: initial human colonization and the prehistoric introduction of domestic animals to Remote Oceania. Biological Invasions 11: 1503–1519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9403-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade undated Samoa country/economy fact sheet. http://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/samoa/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, JMR and Hopster, H 2010 Dog bites in the Netherlands: a study of victims, injuries, circumstances and aggressors to support evaluation of breed specific legislation. The Veterinary Journal 186: 292–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.101 6/j.tvjl.2009.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalla Villa, P, Kahn, S, Iannetti, LA, Di Nardo, A and Serpell, JA 2010 Free-roaming dog control among OIE-member countries. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 97: 58–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, BW, Alie, K, Fielding, WJ, Morters, M and Galindo, F 2007 Preliminary observations on the characteristics of the owned dog population in Roseau, Dominica. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10: 141–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888700701313520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Keuster, T, Lamoureux, J and Kahn, A 2006 Epidemiology of dog bites: a Belgian experience of canine behaviour and public health concerns. The Veterinary Journal 172: 482–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.04.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Nardo, A, Candeloro, L, Budke, CM and Slater, MR 2007 Modeling the effect of sterilization rate on owned dog population size in central Italy. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82: 308–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.06.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnworth, MJ, Campbell, J and Adams, NJ 2011 What's in a name? Perceptions of stray and feral cat welfare and control in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 14: 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2011.527604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faver, CA 2009 Sterilization of companion animals: exploring the attitudes and behaviours of Latino students in South Texas. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12: 314–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888700903163534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, WJ 2010 Dog breeding in New Providence, The Bahamas, and its potential impact on the roaming dog population I: Planned and accidental. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 13: 250–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2010.483881CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, WJ and Mather, J 2000 Stray dogs in an island community: a case from New Providence, The Bahamas. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 3: 305–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0304_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germonpré, M, Sablin, MV, Stevens, RE, Hedges, REM, Hofreiter, M, Stiller, M and Despré, VR 2009 Fossil dogs and wolves from Palaeolithic sites in Belgium, the Ukraine and Russia: osteometry, ancient DNA and stable isotopes. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 473–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jas.2008.09.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, J, Sacks, JJ, White, D and Kresnow, MJ 2008 Dog bites: still a problem? Injury Prevention 14: 296–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.016220Google ScholarPubMed
Houpt, KA, Goodwin, D, Uchida, Y, Baranyiová, E, Fatjó, J and Kakuma, Y 2007 Proceedings of a workshop to identify dog welfare issues in the US, Japan, Czech Republic, Spain and the UK. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106: 221–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Y, Severinghaus, LL and Serpell, JA 2003 Dog keeping in Taiwan: its contribution to the problem of free-roaming dogs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0601_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Y and Sun, L 2010 Factors associated with aggressive responses in pet dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123: 108–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Companion Animal Management Coalition undated Humane Dog Population Management Guidance pp 5. www.icam-coalition.orgGoogle Scholar
Katagiri, S and Oliveira-Sequeira, TCG 2008 Prevalence of dog intestinal parasites and risk perception of zoonotic infection by dog owners in São Paulo State, Brazil. Zoonoses and Public Health 55: 406–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01163.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knobel, DL, Laurenson, MK, Kazwala, RR, Boden, LA and Cleaveland, S 2008 A cross-sectional study of factors associated with dog ownership in Tanzania. BMC Veterinary Research 4(5): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-4-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariti, C, Papi, F, Mengoli, M, Graziana, M, Martelli, F and Gazzano, A 2011 Improvement in children's humaneness toward nonhuman animals through a project of educational anthrozoology. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 6: 12–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matter, HC and Daniels, TJ 2000 Dog ecology and population biology. In: Macpherson, CNL, Meslin, FX and Wandeler, AI (eds) Dog Zoonoses and Public Health. CABI: Wellingborough, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851994369.0017Google Scholar
McKay, SA, Farnworth, MJ and Waran, NK 2009 Current attitudes towards, and incidence of, sterilization of cats and dogs by caregivers (owners) in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12: 331–344. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/10888700903163617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Pacheco, A, Rodríguez-Buenfil, JC, Bolio-Gonzalez, ME, Sauri-Arceo, CH, Jiménez-Coello, M and Forsberg, CL 2007 A survey of dog populations in urban and rural areas of Yucatan, Mexico. Anthrozoös 20: 261–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279307X224809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortolani, A, Vernooij, H and Coppinger, R 2009 Ethiopian village dogs: behavioural responses to a stranger's approach. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119: 210–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrado, R, Rojas, E, Delgade, R, Torrico, MC, Reithinger, R and Garcia, AL 2011 Prevalence of the Leishmania spp infection in domestic dogs in Chapare, Bolivia. Veterinary Parasitology 177: 171–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poss, JE and Bader, JO 2007 Attitudes towards companion animals among Hispanic residents of a Texas border community. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare 10: 243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, M 2008 Fatal dog attacks in Canada, 1990-2007. Canadian Veterinary Journal 49: 577–581Google ScholarPubMed
Rohlf, VI, Bennett, PC, Toukhsati, S and Coleman, G 2010 Why do even committed dog owners fail to comply with some responsible ownership practices? Anthrozoös 23: 143–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303710X12682332909972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosado, B, García-Belenguer, S, León, M and Palacio, J 2009 A comprehensive study of dog bites in Spain, 1995-2004. The Veterinary Journal 179: 383–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samoa Bureau of Statistics 2008 Samoa Population and Housing Census Report. Samoa Burea of Statistics: Apia, SamoaGoogle Scholar
Santoro, V, Giammarco, S, Lozito, P, Smaldone, M and Introna, F 2010 A forensic approach to fatal dog attacks. A case study and review of the literature. Forensic Science International 206: 37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serpell, JA 1995 Introduction. In: Serpell, JA (ed) The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People pp 2–4. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Serpell, JA 2004 Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare 13: 145–151Google Scholar
Slater, MR, Di Nardo, A, Pediconi, O, Villa, PD, Candeloro, L, Alessandrini, B and Del Papa, S 2008 Free-roaming dogs and cats in central Italy: Public perceptions of the problem. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 84: 27–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.10.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totton, SC, Wandeler, AI, Gartley, CJ, Kachhawaha, S, Suman, M, Ribble, CS, Rosatte, RC and McEwen, SA 2010 Assessing reproductive patterns and disorders in free-ranging dogs in Jodhpur, India to optimize a population control program. Theriogenology 74: 1115–1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totton, SC, Wandeler, AI, Ribble, CS, Rosatte, RC and McEwen, SA 2011 Stray dog population health in Jodhpur, India in the wake of an animal birth control (ABC) program. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 98: 215–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.11.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wake, AAF, Minot, EO, Stafford, KJ and Perry, PE 2009 A survey of adult victims of dog bites in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57: 364–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1 080/00480169.2009.60928CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, HB, Friedman, DI and Coben, JH 1998 Incidence of dog bit injuries treated in emergency departments. Journal of the American Medical Association 279: 51–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.1.51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Society for the Protection of Animals 1999 Stray Dog Control. World Society for the Protection of Animals: London, UKGoogle Scholar