Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:08:31.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of driving events on the stability and resting behaviour of cattle, young calves and pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MS Cockram*
Affiliation:
Sir James Dunn Animal Welfare Centre, Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PEI, C1A 4P3, Canada
JY Spence
Affiliation:
Humane Slaughter Association, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Herts AL4 8AN, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: mcockram@upei.ca

Abstract

The welfare of animals in transit may be affected by driving events, such as acceleration, braking and cornering. The relationships between driving events and the behavioural responses of the animals were examined. A single-deck, non-articulated vehicle was fitted with a video-recording system, GPS and tri-axial accelerometer. Two drivers each drove three standard journeys (two 3-h stages on different types of roads) for each animal type. Six different groups of five cattle (Bos taurus), ten calves and ten pigs (Sus scrofa) were each transported on separate journeys. Cattle stood still for most of each journey. Calves spent more time lying down during the second stage of the journey than during the first. Although pigs spent some of the time lying down, they spent more time sitting down and this time was greatest on a motorway and during the second stage of the journey. Frequent adjustments to maintain stability were required in response to acceleration, braking, cornering and rough road surfaces. Some animals experienced repeated falls. Falls occurred after a series of different types of events. The fewest losses of balance occurred on the motorway. As a motorway is a limited access multi-lane carriageway not crossed on the same level by other traffic lanes, the driver does not normally undertake frequent vehicular adjustments to respond to road features. Therefore, motorways give animals an opportunity to rest and avoid discomfort from repetitive driving events. If drivers anticipate potential driving events and prepare for them, it will reduce the likelihood and severity of losses of stability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton-Gade, P 2008 Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: Comparison of outdoor and conventionally raised pigs. Animal 2: 90291110.1017/S1751731108002000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton-Gade, P and Christensen, L 1998 Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in Danish slaughter pigs. Meat Science 48: 237247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00098-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, RH, Hall, SJG and Broom, DM 1996a Behavioural and cortisol response of pigs and sheep during transport. Veterinary Record 138: 233234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.10.233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, RH, Parrott, RF, Forsling, ML, Goode, JA, Lloyd, DM, Rodway, RG and Broom, DM 1996b Stress and travel sickness in pigs: Effects of road transport on plasma concentrations of cortisol, beta-endorphin and lysine vasopressin. Animal Science 63: 507516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S135772980001540XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, MS, Baxter, EM, Smith, L, Bell, S, Howard, CM, Prescott, RJ and Mitchell, MA 2004 Effect of driver behaviour, driving events and road type on the stability and resting behaviour of sheep in transit. Animal Science 79: 16517610.1017/S1357729800054631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebresenbet, G, Aradom, S, Bulitta, FS and Hjerpe, E 2011 Vibration levels and frequencies on vehicle and animals during transport. Biosystems Engineering 110: 1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, A, O’Brien, EJ, Li, Y-Y and Cashell, K 2008 The use of vehicle acceleration measurements to estimate road roughness. Vehicle System Dynamics 46: 48349910.1080/00423110701485050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T and Gallo, C 2007 Cattle transport. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, 3rd Edition pp 134154. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, Oxon, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845932190.0228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigor, PN, Cockram, MS, Steele, WB, Le Sueur, CJ, Forsyth, RE, Guthrie, JA, Johnson, AK, Sandilands, V, Reid, HW, Sinclair, C and Brown, HK 2001 Effects of space allowance during transport and duration of mid-journey lairage period on the physiological, behavioural and immunological responses of young calves during and after transport. Animal Science 73: 34136010.1017/S135772980005832XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, TA, Waitt, C and Dawkins, MS 2010 Sheep lose balance, slip and fall less when loosely packed in transit where they stand close to but not touching their neighbours. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123: 162310.1016/j.applanim.2009.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, FJ and Tarrant, PV 1987a The reaction of young bulls to short-haul road transport. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 209227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, FJ and Tarrant, PV 1987b The physiological and behavioural responses of crossbred Friesian steers to short-haul transport by road. Livestock Production Science 17: 637510.1016/0301-6226(87)90052-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, JE and Ewbank, R 1983 The effect of road transportation on the blood constituents and behaviour of calves I. Six months old. British Veterinary Journal 139: 22823510.1016/S0007-1935(17)30489-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, JE and Ewbank, R 1986 The effect of road transportation on the blood constituents and behaviour of calves II. One to three weeks old. British Veterinary Journal 142: 13114010.1016/0007-1935(86)90088-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, TG, Brown, SN, Edwards, JE, Phillips, AJ and Warriss, PD 1999 Effect on young calves of a one-hour feeding stop during a 19-hour road journey. Veterinary Record 144: 687692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.25.687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooij, E 2007 Transport of pigs. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, 3rd Edition pp 228244. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845932190.0228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooy, E and Engel, B 1991 Transport of slaughter pigs by truck over a long distance: some aspects of loading density and ventilation. Livestock Production Science 28: 163174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(91)90006-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooy, E, Garssen, GJ, Walstra, P, Mateman, G and Merkus, GSM 1985 Transport of pigs by car for two days; some aspects of watering and loading density. Livestock Production Science 13: 289299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(85)90007-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooy, E and Hulsegge, B 1988 Long-distance transport of pregnant heifers by truck. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 249258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(88)90050-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locatelli, A, Sartorelli, P, Agnes, F, Bondiolotti, GP and Picotti, GB 1989 Adrenal response in the calf to repeated simulated transport. British Veterinary Journal 145: 517522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(89)90112-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeters, E, Deprez, K, Beckers, F, Baerdemaeker, JD, Aubert, AE and Geers, R 2008 Effect of driver and driving style on the stress responses of pigs during a short journey by trailer. Animal Welfare 17: 189196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perremans, S, Randall, JM, Allegaert, L, Stiles, MA, Rombouts, G and Geers, R 1998 Influence of vertical vibration on heart rate of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76: 416420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petherick, JC and Phillips, CJC 2009 Space allowances for confined livestock and their determination from allometric principles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117: 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, JM and Bradshaw, RH 1998 Vehicle motion and motion sickness in pigs. Animal Science 66: 239245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800009012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouillard, V 2002 Remote monitoring of vehicle shock and vibrations. Packaging Technology and Science 15: 8392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pts.572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 2000 SAS System for Windows, Release 8. 01. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Stephens, DB, Bailey, KJ, Sharman, DF and Ingram, DL 1985 An analysis of some behavioural effects of the vibration and noise components of transport in pigs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 70: 211217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, PV 1990 Transportation of cattle by road. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 153170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90051-ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, PV, Kenny, FJ and Harrington, D 1988 The effect of stocking density during 4 hour transport to slaughter on behaviour, blood constituents and carcass bruising in Friesian steers. Meat Science 24: 209222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, PV, Kenny, FJ, Harrington, D and Murphy, M 1992 Long distance transportation of steers to slaughter: effect of stocking density on physiology, behaviour and carcass quality. Livestock Production Science 30: 22323810.1016/S0301-6226(06)80012-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD 1998 The welfare of slaughter pigs during transport. Animal Welfare 7: 36538110.1017/S0962728600020923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Edwards, JE, Dolan, SK and Phillips, AJ 1995 Effects on cattle of transport by road for up to 15 hours. Veterinary Record 136: 319323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.136.13.319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikner, I, Gebresenbet, G and Tolo, E 2003 Dynamic performances of cattle transporting vehicle on Scandinavian roads and behavioural response of animals. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 110: 114120Google ScholarPubMed