Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T02:08:13.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Ethology and the Treatment of Non-Human Animals: How Matters of Mind Inform Matters of Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M Bekoff
M Bekoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
*
Correspondence address: 296 Canyonside Drive, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anthropocentric claims about the ways in which non-human animals (hereafter animals) interact in their social and non-social worlds are often used to influence decisions on how animals can or should be used by humans in various sorts of activities. Thus, the treatment of individuals is often tightly linked to how they are perceived with respect to their ability to perform behaviour patterns that suggest that they can think - have beliefs, desires, or make plans and have expectations about the future. Here, I review some basic issues in the comparative study of animal minds and discuss how matters of mind are related to matters of welfare and well-being. Much comparative research still needs to be done before any stipulative claims can be made about how an individual's cognitive abilities can be used to influence decisions about how she or he should be treated. More individuals from diverse species whose lives, sensory worlds, motor abilities and nervous systems are different from those of animals with whom we identify most readily or with whom we are the most familiar, need to be studied. As others, I stress the importance of subjectivity and common sense along with the use of empirical data in making decisions about animal welfare, and that subjective assessments should be viewed in the same critical light as are supposedly objective scientific facts. I also argue that whatever connections there are between an individual's cognitive abilities and what sorts of treatment are permissible can be overridden by that individual's ability to feel pain and to suffer. When we are uncertain, even only slightly, about their ability to experience pain or to suffer, individual animals should be given the benefit of the doubt. There is a great deal of uncertainty about the phylogenetic distribution of pain and suffering.

Keywords

animal cognitionanimal consciousnessanimal welfarecognitive ethologysentience
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 75 - 96
Copyright
© 1994 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arluke, A 1993 Trapped in a guilt cage. Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter 4: 1–8Google Scholar
Bateson, PPG 1991 Assessment of pain in animals. Animal Behaviour 42: 827–839Google Scholar
Beck, B B 1978 Talkers and doers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, C 1992 Conceptual issues in cognitive ethology. Advances in the Study of Behavior 21: 69–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M 1992 What is a ‘scale of life?’ Environmental Values 1: 253–256Google Scholar
Bekoff, M 1993 Common sense, cognitive ethology and evolution. In Cavalieri, P and Singer, P (eds) The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity pp 102–108. Fourth Estate: LondonGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M 1994 Individuating, normalizing, and naturalizing the study of animal well-being and animal minds: a zoologist’s naiveté exposed? Paper presented at Wildlife Conservation, Zoos, and Animal Protection: Examining the Issues, April 1994, Jacksonville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M and Allen, C 1994 Cognitive ethology: slayers, skeptics, and proponents. In Mitchell R W, Thompson N and Miles L (eds). Anthropomorphism, Anecdote, and Animals: The Emperor’s New Clothes? University of Nebraska Press: LincolnGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M and Gruen, L 1993 Animal welfare and individual characteristics: a conversation against speciesism. Ethics and Behavior 3: 163–175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekoff, M and Hettinger, N 1994 Animals, nature, and ethics. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M and Jamieson, D (eds) 1990 Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior, Volume I: Interpretation, lntentionality, and Communication. Volume II: Explanation, Evolution, and Adaptation. Westview Press: BoulderGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M and Jamieson, D 1991 Reflective ethology, applied philosophy, and the moral status of animals. Perspectives in Ethology 9: 1–47Google Scholar
Bekoff, M and Jamieson, D 1994 Ethics and the study of carnivores. In Gittleman, J L (ed) Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J 1789 An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Reprinted 1948, Hafner Press: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowd, A D and Shapiro, K J 1993 The case against laboratory animal research in psychology. Journal of Social Issues 49: 133–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, D M 1993 A usable definition of animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(Special Supplement 2): 15–25Google Scholar
Broom, D M and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burghardt, G 1992 Who’s looking? Contemporary Psychology 37: 1333–1335Google Scholar
Byrne, R 1991 Review of D Cheney and R Seyfarth. How Monkeys See the World. The Sciences July: 142–147Google Scholar
Byrne, R and Whiten, A (eds) 1988 Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J B 1980 Animal liberation: a triangular affair. In Callicott J B In Defense of The Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy pp 15–38. Reprinted 1989, SUNY Press: Albany, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, J L and Strawn, W 1993 Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P 1989 Brute experience. Journal of Philosophy 86: 258–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P 1992 The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, P and Singer, P (eds) 1993 The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. Fourth Estate: LondonGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D L and Seyfarth, R M 1990 How Monkeys See The World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D L and Seyfarth, R M 1992 Précis of How Monkeys See The World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 135–182Google Scholar
Cheney, D L and Seyfarth, R M 1993 Dogs that don’t bark in the night: how to investigate the lack of a domain of expertise? Philosophy of Science Association 2: 92–109Google Scholar
Crisp, R 1990 Evolution and psychological unity. In Bekoff, M and Jamieson, D (eds) Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior, Volume II: Explanation, Evolution, and Adaptation pp 394–413. Westview Press: BoulderGoogle Scholar
Cronin, H 1992 Review of Griffin 1992. The New York Times Book Review November: 14Google Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1990 From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1993 Through Our Eyes Only? W H Freeman: San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
DeGrazia, D 1991 The moral status of animals and their use in research: a philosophical review. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal March: 48–70Google Scholar
DeGrazia, D and Rowan, A 1991 Pain, suffering, and anxiety in animals and humans. Theoretical Medicine 12: 193–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D C 1991 Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Company: BostonGoogle Scholar
Dresser, R 1993 Culpability and other minds. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 2: 41–88Google Scholar
Duncan, I J H 1992 Measuring preferences and the strength of preferences. Poultry Science 71: 658–663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, I J H 1993a The science of animal well-being. Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter 4: 1–7Google Scholar
Duncan, I J H 1993b Welfare is to do with what animals feel. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(Special Supplement 2): 8–14Google Scholar
Duncan, I J H and Petherick, J C 1991 The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science 69: 5017–5022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, I J H and Poole, T B 1990 Promoting the welfare of farm and captive environments. In Monaghan, P and Wood-Gush, D (eds) Managing the Behaviour of Animals pp 193–232. Chapman and Hall: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J 1993 The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, E J and Rosovsky, J 1993 The ethics of ecological field experimentation. Conservation Biology 7: 463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J A 1987 Taking sympathy seriously: a defense of our moral psychology towards animals. Environmental Ethics 9: 197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1993 Assessing animal well-being: common sense, uncommon science. In Food Animal Well-Being: 1993 Conference Proceedings and Deliberations pp 37–54. Purdue University Office of Agricultural Research Programs: West Lafayette, IndianaGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G G 1982 Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology 3: 237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavaghan, H 1992 Animal experiments the American way. New Scientist 16 May: 32–36Google Scholar
Gentle, M J 1992 Pain in birds. Animal Welfare 1: 237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, E F, Wyers, E J, Waters, E and Menzel, E W (eds) 1994 Naturalistic Environments in Captivity for Animal Behavior Research. SUNY Press: Albany, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A 1993 Philosophical Applications of Cognitive Science. Westview Press: BoulderGoogle Scholar
Gompertz, L 1824 Moral Inquiries: On the Situation of Man and of Brutes. Reprinted 1992, Centaur Press Ltd: FontwellGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D 1976 The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience. Rockefeller University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D R 1978 Prospects for a cognitive ethology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D 1984 Animal Thinking. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D 1992 Animal Minds. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Gruen, L 1992 Animals. In Singer, P (ed) A Companion to Ethics pp 343–353. Basil Blackwell: Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Hannay, A 1990 Human Consciousness. Routledge: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Hardy, D T 1990 America’s New Extremists: What You Need to Know About the Animal Rights Movement. Washington Legal Foundation: Washington DCGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P 1991 Do animals feel pain? Philosophy 66: 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C 1987 Cognisance of consciousness in the study of animal knowledge. In Callebaut, W and Pinxten, R (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology pp 105–135. D Reidel: BostonGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C 1993 Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states? Animal Behaviour 46: 177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C 1994 Reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour 47: 909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, W E 1993 Animal research is defensible. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 234–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N 1976 The social function of intellect. In Bateson, PPG and Hinde, R A (eds) Growing Points in Ethology pp 303–317. Cambridge University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D and Bekoff, M 1992a Carruthers on nonconscious experience. Analysis 52: 23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D and Bekoff, M 1992b Some problems and prospects for cognitive ethology. Between the Species 8: 80–82Google Scholar
Jamieson, D and Bekoff, M 1993 On aims and methods of cognitive ethology. Philosophy of Science Association 2: 110–124Google Scholar
Jensen, P and Toates, F M 1993 Who needs ‘behavioural needs’? Motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E 1983 Life, death, and animals. In Miller, H B and Williams, W H (eds) Ethics and Animals pp 123–133. Humana Press: Clifton, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E 1991 Carruthers on consciousness and moral status. Between the Species 7: 190193Google Scholar
Johnson, M 1993 Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, F 1994 Machines, sentience, and the scope of morality. Environmental Ethics 16: 57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J L 1992 The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansdell, H 1988 Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal ‘rights’ may debase human rights. International Journal of Neuroscience 42: 169–178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurenson, M K and Caro, T M 1994 Monitoring the effects of non-trivial handling in free-living cheetahs. Animal Behaviour 47: 547–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A B and Rushen, J (eds) 1993 Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. CAB International: WallingfordGoogle Scholar
Leahy, T 1991 Against Liberation. Routledge: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D 1980 Mad pain and martian pain. In Block, N (ed) Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Volume 1 pp 216–222. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Lloyd Morgan, C 1896 Habit and Instinct. Edward Arnold: New YorkGoogle Scholar
McGIone, J J 1993 What is animal welfare? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(Special Supplement 2): 26–36Google Scholar
McGrew, W C 1992 Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge University Press: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1991a Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1991b Stereotypies and suffering. Behavioural Processes 25: 103–115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, G J 1994 Review of Wemelsfelder 1993. Animal Welfare 3: 57–60Google Scholar
Mason, G J (in press) Age and context affect the stereotypies of caged mink. BehaviourGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Mendi, M 1993 Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare 2: 301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, W A 1979 Environmental models and mental modes: representational processes in the great apes. In Hamburg, D A and McGown, E R (eds) The Great Apes pp 277–293. The Benjamin/Cummins Publishing Company: Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
Mench, J A 1993 Assessing animal welfare: an overview. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(Special Supplement 2): 68–75Google Scholar
Meyer, J-A, Roitblat, H L and Wilson, S W (eds) 1993 From Animals to Animats 2. MIT Press: Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J-A and Wilson, S W (eds) 1991 From Animals to Animats. MIT Press: Cambridge, MassachusettsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgley, M 1983 Animals and Why They Matter. University of Georgia Press: AthensGoogle Scholar
Mineka, S and Cook, M 1988 Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. In Zentall, T R and Galef, B G (eds) Social Learning: Psychological and Biological Perspectives pp 51–73. L Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R W 1993a Mental models of mirror-self-recognition: two theories. New Ideas in Psychology 11: 295–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R W 1993b Recognizing one’s self in a mirror? A reply to Gallup and Povinelli, De Lannoy, Anderson and Byrne. New Ideas in Psychology 11: 351–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlans, F B 1993 In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Platt, M M, Thompson, R L and Boatright, S L 1991 Monkeys and mirrors: questions about methodology. In Fedigan, L M and Asquith, P J (eds) The Monkeys of Arashiyama pp 274–290. SUNY Press: Albany, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Plous, S 1993 Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues 49: 11–52Google Scholar
Pluhar, E B 1993a Arguing away suffering: the neo-Cartesian revival. Between The Species 9: 27–41Google Scholar
Pluhar, E B 1993b Reply. Between The Species 9: 77–82Google Scholar
Povinelli, D J 1993 Reconstructing the evolution of mind. American Psychologist 48: 493509Google ScholarPubMed
Rachels, J 1990 Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Regan, T 1983 The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press: BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Ristau, C 1991 Aspects of the cognitive ethology of an injury-feigning bird, the piping plover. In Ristau, C (ed) Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals pp 91–126. L Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
Rollin, B E 1981 Animal Rights and Human Morality. Reprinted 1992, Prometheus Books: Buffalo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rollin, B E 1989 The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain and Science. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rose, S 1992 The Making of Memory. Anchor Books: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P 1976 The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. In Sprague, J N and Epstein, A N (eds) Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, Volume 6 pp 245–280. Academic Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M and Adams, D 1989 Evidence for pain and suffering in other animals. In Langley, G (ed) Animal Experimentation: The Consensus Changes pp 42–71. Chapman and Hall: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzzante, D E 1992 Mirror image stimulation, social hierarchies, and population differences in agonistic behaviour: a reappraisal. Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Science 49: 1966–1968Google Scholar
Sacks, O 1992 The last Hippie. The New York Review of Books 26 March: 53–62Google Scholar
Sandoe, P and Simonsen, H P 1992 Assessing animal welfare: where does science end and philosophy begin? Animal Welfare 1: 257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapontzis, S F 1987 Morals, Reason, and Animals. Temple University Press: PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Serpell, J 1986 In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-Animal Relationships. Basil Blackwell: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Singer, P 1990 Animal Liberation, 2nd edition. New York Review of Books: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Singer, P 1992 Bandit and friends. The New York Review of Books 9 April: 9–13Google Scholar
Snowdon, C T 1989 The criteria for successful captive propagation of endangered species. Zoo Biology Supplement 1: 149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowdon, C T 1991 Review of Ristau 1991. Science 251: 813–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, K B and Evans, S 1991 Not all chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-recognition. Primates 32: 483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szcntágothai, J 1987 The ‘mind-brain’ relation: a pseudoproblem? In Blakemore C and Greenfield S (eds) Mindwaves: Thoughts on Intelligence, Identity, and Consciousness pp 323–336. Basil Blackwell: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Tarnas, R 1991 The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas that Have Shaped Our World View. Ballantine Books: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, EMC 1993 Environmentaland Individual Factors Contributing to the Occurrence of Stereotypies in Female Pigs (Sus scrofa). PhD thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
Washburn, M F 1908 The Animal Mind: A Text-Book of Comparative Psychology. The Macmillan Company: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, E A 1993 Comparative cognition: beginning the second century of the study of animal intelligence. Psychological Bulletin 113: 211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskrantz, L (ed) 1988 Thought Without Language. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 1993 Animal Boredom: Towards an Empirical Approach of Animal Subjectivity. PhD thesis, University of LeidenGoogle Scholar
White, R J 1990 Letter. Hastings Center Report November/December: 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A and Ham, R 1992 On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: reappraisal of a century of research. Advances in the Study of Behavior 21: 239–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G C 1992 Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar