Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:28:07.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The challenges and future development of animal welfare education in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

JC Muldoon  and
JM Williams
JC Muldoon*
Affiliation:
Caar (Children, adolescents and animals research), Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 6, Medical School, Elsie Inglis Quad, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
JM Williams
Affiliation:
Caar (Children, adolescents and animals research), Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 6, Medical School, Elsie Inglis Quad, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence: janine.muldoon@ed.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At present, UK schools are not required to teach children about animal welfare. This undoubtedly contributes to widespread deficiencies in knowledge, and misconceptions about animals’ needs, likes, and dislikes. Aware of the issues at hand, animal welfare organisations create their own materials for teachers to use, and/or deliver educational programmes directly to children and young people. As the design, content, processes and outcomes associated with these interventions are rarely documented publicly or systematically evaluated, there is little evidence to guide the development of animal welfare education. A three-stage online Delphi study was used to identify who current interventions target, what delivery methods are being used, and how expert practitioners describe priorities and challenges in the field. Thirty-one experts participated in Round 1, with 84% of the sample (n = 26) also taking part in Round 2. Qualitative analysis revealed passionate accounts about the far-reaching potential of educating children about animals. However, we also identified ambiguities and tensions that could thwart the future development of effective animal welfare education. Alongside the production of a web-based framework and evidence-based toolkit to support practitioners, findings will be used to encourage animal welfare professionals to work towards producing shared terminology, definitions, and outcomes’ frameworks; focusing on positive education and the idea of harm as opposed to cruelty. This should facilitate collaboration with schoolteachers and education policymakers to assess the ways in which animal welfare might be successfully incorporated within formal education in the future. These data suggest many potential avenues for inclusion, although a holistic approach emphasising the links between humans, animals and the environment, within the context of young people's recent activism and contemporary health, societal and environmental issues, may be most successful.

Keywords

animal welfareanimal welfare educationchildrencruelty preventionDelphievaluation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 197 - 209
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Arbour, R, Signal, T and Taylor, N 2009 Teaching kindness: The promise of humane education. Society and Animals 17: 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853009X418073Google Scholar
Arkow, P 2006 ‘Old wine in a new bottle’: New strategies for humane education. In: Fine, AH (ed) Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy, 2nd Edition pp 425–451. Elsevier/Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Ascione, FR 1997 Humane education research: Evaluating efforts to encourage children's kindness and caring toward animals. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 123: 59–77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289452372_Google Scholar
Binfet, JT and Kjellstrand Hartwig, E 2020 Canine-Assisted Interventions: A Comprehensive Guide to Credentialing Therapy Dog Teams. Routledge: New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, C, Gericke, N, Höglund, HO and Bergman, E 2012 The barriers encountered by teachers implementing education for sustainable development: Discipline bound differences and teaching traditions. Research in Science and Technological Education 30(2): 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.699891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes, E and Stanisstreet, M 2012 Environmental Education for behaviour change: Which actions should be targeted? International Journal of Science Education 34(10): 1591–1614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.584079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun Fung, S and Zhou, S 2020 An investigation of pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward animals and empathy toward humans: Implications for Humane Education development. Anthrozoös 33(3): 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1746531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Hall, MJ and Hay, M 2008 An evaluation of a pet ownership education program for school children Anthrozoös 21:271–284. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708X332071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Education Scotland 2020 The Compassionate and Connected Classroom Curricula Resource (A National Improvement Hub resource). https://education.gov.scot/improvement/learning-resources/compassionate-and-connected-classroomGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1990 Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. Farm Animal Welfare Council: London, UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa ds/attachment_data/file/319292/Farm_Animal_Welfare_in_Great_Britain _-_Past__Present_and_Future.pdfGoogle Scholar
Faver C, A 2010 School-based humane education as a strategy to prevent violence: Review and recommendations. Children and Youth Services Review 32: 365–370. https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci-ence/article/abs/pii/S0190740909002722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, MJ, Franco, NH, Brosseron, F, Tavares, F, Olsson, IAS and Borlido-Santos, J 2011 Children's attitudes towards animals: Evidence from the RODENTIA project. Journal of Biological Education 45(3): 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.576259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Pinillos, R, Appleby, M, Manteca, X, Scott-Park, F, Smith, C and Velarde, A 2016 One Welfare – a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record (October):412-413. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.i5470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins R, Williams J and Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SSPCA) 2017 Assessing effectiveness of a nonhuman animal welfare education program for primary school children. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 20(3): 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2017.1305272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, RD, Mendes Ferreira, GAR and Williams, JM 2019 The development and evaluation of ‘farm animal welfare’: An edu-cational computer game for children. Animals 9 (91). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, M 2000 Using logic models and Program Theory to build outcome accountability. Education and Treatment of Children 23(1): 24–40. www.jstor.org/stable/42899601Google Scholar
International Association of Human-Animal Interaction Organizations (IAHAIO) 2014 Definitions for Animal-Assisted Intervention and Guidelines for Wellness of Animals Involved in AAI. https://iahaio.org/best-practice/white-paper-on-animal-assisted-interventions/Google Scholar
Jensen, BB 2002 Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research 8(3): 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, S, Hasson, F and McKenna, H 2011 The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Chichester, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444392029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekahio, W, Cicchinelli, L, Lawton, B and Brandon, PR 2014 Logic models: A tool for effective program planning, collaboration, and monitoring (REL 2014–025). US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Pacific: Washington DC, USA. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabsGoogle Scholar
Lasen, M, Skamp, K and Simoncini, K 2017 Teacher perceptions and self-reported practices of education for sustainability in the early years of primary school: An Australian case study. International Journal of Early Childhood 49(3): 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0200-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavis, P and Robson, C 2015 Promoting children and young peo-ple's emotional health and wellbeing: A whole school and college approach. PHE publications gateway number: 2014825. Public Health England: London, UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/sys-tem/uploads/attachment_data/file/958151/Promoting_children_an d_young_people_s_emotional_health_and_wellbeing_a_whole_sc hool_and_college_approach.pdfGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, L and Badenes-Ribera, L 2019 The relationship between animal cruelty in children and adolescent and interper-sonal violence: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 46: 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariti, C, Papi, F, Mengoli, M, Moretti, G, Martelli, F and Gazzano, A 2011 Improvement in children's humaneness toward nonhuman animals through a project of educational anthrozoolo-gy. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 6:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, MC, Plate, RR, Oxarart, A, Bowers, A and Chaves, WA 2019 Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research 25(6): 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsalve, S, Ferreira, F and Garcia, R 2017 The connection between animal abuse and interpersonal violence: A review from the veterinary perspective. Research in Veterinary Science 114: 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan-Trimmer, S, Smith, J, Warmoth, K and Abraham, C 2018 Introduction to Logic Models. Public Health England Guidance on Evaluation in Health and Wellbeing. PHE publication gateway reference 2017649. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-in-health-and-well-being-overview/introduction-to-logic-modelsGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, JC and Williams, JM 2021 Establishing consensus on the best ways to educate children about animal welfare and pre-vent harm: an online Delphi study. Animal Welfare 30: 179–195. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.2.179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, K, Trifone, C and Samuels, WE 2008 An in-class, humane education program can improve young students’ atti-tudes toward animals. Society & Animals 16(1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853008X269881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
One Health Initiative Task Force 2008 One Health: A New Professional Imperative. American Veterinary Medical Association. https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/onehealth_final.pdfGoogle Scholar
One Welfare 2020 https://www.onewelfareworld.org/Google Scholar
Ratschen, E and Sheldon, TA 2019 Elephant in the room: ani-mal-assisted interventions. BMJ 367: l6260. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rioja-Lang, F, Bacon, H, Connor, M and Dwyer, CM 2020 Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert con-sensus. Veterinary Record. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RSPCA 2018 Building a kinder generation: How the RSPCA will educate the adults of tomorrow to tackle the animal welfare crisis of today. RSPCA: Horsham, West Sussex, UK. https://www.rspca.org.uk/doc-uments/1494939/7712578/Prevention+report.pdf/eae6c8c9-758a-ccdc-f69c-66c0bc6ffb1a?t=1555596722243&download=trueGoogle Scholar
Rule, AC and Zhbanova, KS 2014 Guardians of the earth: Teaching children to care for all living things. In: Renck Jalongo, M (ed) Teaching Compassion: Humane Education in Early Childhood. Educating the Young Child (Advances in Theory and Research, Implications for Practice), Volume 8. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6922-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, WE 2018 Nurturing kindness naturally: A humane education program's effect on the prosocial behavior of first and second graders across China. International Journal of Educational Research 91: 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, WE, Meers, LL and Normando, S 2016 Improving upper elementary students’ humane attitudes and prosocial behav-iors through an in-class humane education program. Anthrozoös 29(4): 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1228751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Companion Animal Studies 2019 Animal-Assisted Interventions: SCAS Code of Practice for the UK http://www.scas.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SCAS-AAI-Code-of-Practice-August-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sumsion, T 1998 The Delphi Technique: An adaptive research tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 61(4): 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269806100403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C 2017 Embodying ‘the Next Generation’: children's everyday environmental activism in India and England. Contemporary Social Science 12(1-2): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1325922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WK Kellogg Foundation 2004 Logic Model Development Guide: Using Logic Models to Bring Together Planning, Evaluation, and Action. WK Kellogg Foundation: Michigan, US. https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resources/2004/01/logic-model-development-guideGoogle Scholar