Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:23:26.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Virtuous Bicycle: a delivery vehicle for improved farm animal welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

AJF Webster
AJF Webster*
Affiliation:
Old Sock Cottage, Mudford Sock, Yeovil, Somerset BA22 8EA, UK; email: john.webster@bris.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper briefly reviews the development of monitoring procedures used for the assessment of husbandry and welfare within Farm Quality Assurance (QA) schemes. Most current protocols are based on measures of the resources, records and management provisions necessary to promote good husbandry. However, it is now generally accepted that monitoring protocols should be largely or wholly made up of direct, animal-based measurements of animal welfare. Whether based on provisions or outcomes, many current schemes lack impact, partly because they do not necessarily lead to effective action on-farm and partly through lack of public awareness or trust in the claimed benefits of the scheme. This paper proposes the concept of the ‘Virtuous Bicycle’ as a delivery vehicle for improvements in farm animal welfare through simultaneous operation of two virtuous cycles, one on-farm, involving assessment, action and review, the other at the retailer level, involving assurance and promotion, based on proof of compliance.

Keywords

animal-based protocolsanimal welfareconsumer demandfinancial incentivesquality assurancewelfare monitoring
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 141 - 147
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B and Berg, C 2001 Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica (Section A Animal Science supplement) 30: 88–92Google Scholar
Bartussek, H 1999 A review of the Animal Index (ANI) for assessment of animal's well-being in housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science 61: 179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, NJ, Bell, MJ, Knowles, TG, Whay, HE, Main, DCJ and Webster, AJF 2009 The development, implementation and testing of a lameness-control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. The Veterinary Journal 180: 178–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botreau, R, Veissier, I, Butterworth, A, Bracke, MBM and Keeling, L 2007a Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 16: 225–228Google Scholar
Botreau, R, Bonde, M, Butterworth, A, Perny, P, Bracke, MBM, Capdeville, J and Veissier, I 2007b Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1, a review of existing methods. Animal 1(8): 1179–1187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botreau, R, Bracke, MBM, Perny, P, Butterworth, A, Capdeville, J, van Rennen, CG and Veissier, I 2007c Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2, analysis of constraints. Animal 1(8): 1188–1197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compassion in World Farming 2002 Farm Assurance Schemes and Animal Welfare. CIWF Trust: Petersfield, Hants, UKGoogle Scholar
Curry Commission 2002 Report of the Curry Commission on the Future of Farming and Food. http://archives.cabinetoffice.gov.ukGoogle Scholar
Duncan, IJH, Widowski, TM, Malleau, AE, Lindberg, AC and Petherick, JC 1998 External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 43: 219–228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Commission 2005 Attitude of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer 229: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1993 Second Report on Priorities for Research and Development in Farm Animal Welfare. FAWC: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 2001 Interim Report on the Animal Welfare Implications of Farm Assurance Schemes. FAWC: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 2005 Report on the Animal Welfare Implications of Farm Assurance Schemes. FAWC: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Huxley, JN, Burke, J, Roderick, S, Main, DCJ and Whay, HR 2006 Animal welfare assessment benchmarking as a tool for health and welfare planning in organic dairy herds. Veterinary Record 155: 237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, JB, Webster, AJF and Wathes, CM 1999 Trade off between ammonia exposure and thermal comfort in pigs and the influence of social contact. Animal Science 68: 387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, DCJ, Kent, JP, Wemelsfelder, F, Ofner, E and Tuyttens, FAM 2003 Applications for methods of on-farm welfare assessment. Animal Welfare 12: 523–528Google Scholar
Webster, AJF, Main, DCJ and Whay, HR 2004 Welfare assessment: indices from clinical observation. Animal Welfare 13: S93–S98Google Scholar
Webster, AJF 2005 Animal Welfare: Limping towards Eden. Blackwell Publications: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003a Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: Consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12:205–217Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003b Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Record 153: 197–202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE, Heaven, G, Howell, H, Morgan, M, Pearson, A and Webster, AJF 2007 Assessment of the behaviour and welfare of laying hens on free-range units. Veterinary Record 161: 119–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed